Revised Precapillary Pulmonary Hypertension Criteria and Their Prognostic Value in IPF Transplant Waitlist Survival.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Pulmonary Circulation Pub Date : 2025-02-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1002/pul2.70046
Zehra Dhanani, Michael J Nicholson, Shameek Gayen
{"title":"Revised Precapillary Pulmonary Hypertension Criteria and Their Prognostic Value in IPF Transplant Waitlist Survival.","authors":"Zehra Dhanani, Michael J Nicholson, Shameek Gayen","doi":"10.1002/pul2.70046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a leading indication for lung transplantation. Pulmonary hypertension (PH), a common comorbidity in IPF, has gained renewed attention following the updated ESC/ERS guidelines, which redefine diagnostic thresholds for PH. This study evaluates the impact of the revised PH criteria on transplant waitlist outcomes among IPF patients. Specifically, we assessed the prevalence of PH under the new guidelines and its association with waitlist survival. We conducted a retrospective analysis using the OPTN/SRTR database, including 14,156 IPF candidates listed for lung transplantation. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier and multivariate models to examine the influence of revised mPAP and PVR thresholds on waitlist mortality. The prevalence of PH, defined by the revised criteria, was significantly higher compared to the prior definition. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated worse waitlist survival for patients with PH under both diagnostic thresholds. However, multivariate analysis revealed that mPAP and PVR thresholds were not independently predictive of mortality. Instead, clinical parameters, including 6MWD, functional status, BMI, FVC, PaCO2, and double lung transplant preference, were significant predictors of waitlist mortality. In conclusion, while the revised PH diagnostic criteria increase PH prevalence in IPF patients, their independent prognostic utility for waitlist survival is limited. This national transplant database study underscores the importance of comprehensive clinical evaluation and timely referral for transplantation in managing IPF with PH.</p>","PeriodicalId":20927,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Circulation","volume":"15 1","pages":"e70046"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11788316/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pul2.70046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a leading indication for lung transplantation. Pulmonary hypertension (PH), a common comorbidity in IPF, has gained renewed attention following the updated ESC/ERS guidelines, which redefine diagnostic thresholds for PH. This study evaluates the impact of the revised PH criteria on transplant waitlist outcomes among IPF patients. Specifically, we assessed the prevalence of PH under the new guidelines and its association with waitlist survival. We conducted a retrospective analysis using the OPTN/SRTR database, including 14,156 IPF candidates listed for lung transplantation. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier and multivariate models to examine the influence of revised mPAP and PVR thresholds on waitlist mortality. The prevalence of PH, defined by the revised criteria, was significantly higher compared to the prior definition. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated worse waitlist survival for patients with PH under both diagnostic thresholds. However, multivariate analysis revealed that mPAP and PVR thresholds were not independently predictive of mortality. Instead, clinical parameters, including 6MWD, functional status, BMI, FVC, PaCO2, and double lung transplant preference, were significant predictors of waitlist mortality. In conclusion, while the revised PH diagnostic criteria increase PH prevalence in IPF patients, their independent prognostic utility for waitlist survival is limited. This national transplant database study underscores the importance of comprehensive clinical evaluation and timely referral for transplantation in managing IPF with PH.

修订的毛细血管前肺动脉高压标准及其在IPF移植等待者生存中的预后价值。
特发性肺纤维化(IPF)是肺移植的主要指征。肺动脉高压(PH)是IPF中一种常见的合并症,在更新的ESC/ERS指南后重新定义了PH的诊断阈值,该指南重新引起了人们的关注。本研究评估了修订的PH标准对IPF患者移植等待名单结果的影响。具体而言,我们评估了新指南下PH的患病率及其与等候名单生存的关系。我们使用OPTN/SRTR数据库进行了回顾性分析,包括14,156例肺移植的IPF候选人。使用Kaplan-Meier和多变量模型进行生存分析,以检验修订后的mPAP和PVR阈值对等候名单死亡率的影响。修订后的标准所定义的PH患病率明显高于先前的定义。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,在两种诊断阈值下,PH患者的等待名单生存期更差。然而,多变量分析显示mPAP和PVR阈值不能独立预测死亡率。相反,临床参数,包括6MWD、功能状态、BMI、FVC、PaCO2和双肺移植偏好,是等待名单死亡率的重要预测因素。总之,虽然修订后的PH诊断标准增加了IPF患者的PH患病率,但其对等待名单生存的独立预后效用有限。这项国家移植数据库研究强调了综合临床评估和及时转诊移植在治疗IPF合并PH中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pulmonary Circulation
Pulmonary Circulation Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
153
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Pulmonary Circulation''s main goal is to encourage basic, translational, and clinical research by investigators, physician-scientists, and clinicans, in the hope of increasing survival rates for pulmonary hypertension and other pulmonary vascular diseases worldwide, and developing new therapeutic approaches for the diseases. Freely available online, Pulmonary Circulation allows diverse knowledge of research, techniques, and case studies to reach a wide readership of specialists in order to improve patient care and treatment outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信