Retrospective Visual and Quantitative Assessment of Burst Suppression With and Without Identical Bursts in Patients After Cardiac Arrest.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Michael W K Fong, Kelly Pu, Rachel Beekman, Noah Kim, Christine Nguyen, Emily J Gilmore, Lawrence J Hirsch, Hitten P Zaveri
{"title":"Retrospective Visual and Quantitative Assessment of Burst Suppression With and Without Identical Bursts in Patients After Cardiac Arrest.","authors":"Michael W K Fong, Kelly Pu, Rachel Beekman, Noah Kim, Christine Nguyen, Emily J Gilmore, Lawrence J Hirsch, Hitten P Zaveri","doi":"10.1007/s12028-024-02208-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The objective of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of identical bursts (IBs) in cardiac arrest survivors with burst suppression on continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring. Burst suppression with IBs is associated with poor neurological outcomes and mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of cardiac arrest survivors admitted to a US academic medical center between 2013 and 2021 who had an EEG background of burst suppression. EEG and clinical features were extracted from our institutional review board-approved repositories. EEG features were qualitatively and quantitatively rated at 0, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h following initiation of monitoring. Qualitative visual assessment occurred, blinded to all clinical features, including outcomes, and in accordance with the current American Clinical Neurophysiology Society definition. Quantitative assessment involved manual marking of 50 consecutive pairs of bursts and interburst intervals (IBIs) for analysis. Similarity of bursts/IBIs were assessed with correlation coefficients. The primary clinical outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Comparisons were performed between groups, and a multivariate model was generated for significant variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 593 cardiac arrest patients, 203 (34.2%) had burst suppression. Thirty-one (15.3%) patients with burst suppression survived. IBs were detected in 80 patients (39.4% of burst suppression). No patient with qualitatively identified IBs had a good neurological outcome (76 deceased, 4 in a state of unresponsive wakefulness). Whereas 11 of 123 (8.9%) with burst suppression without IB had Cerebral Performance Category scores of 1-2. Quantitative analysis of 268 instances of burst suppression demonstrated that mortality was associated with longer bursts, longer IBIs, and higher burst correlation coefficients (i.e., bursts that were more similar to each other) only when allowing analysis of the first 2 s of bursts. Binary logistic regression showed that the only independent EEG predictor of mortality was the burst correlation coefficient measured over 2 s (adjusted odds ratio 4.82 [95% confidence interval 1.21-8.42], p = 0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using a single-center US cohort, IBs within 72 h post cardiac arrest were strongly associated with poor outcomes. Quantitative analysis revealed that including the first 2 s of the bursts was superior to limiting the analysis to 0.5-1 s.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02208-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study was to assess the prognostic significance of identical bursts (IBs) in cardiac arrest survivors with burst suppression on continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring. Burst suppression with IBs is associated with poor neurological outcomes and mortality.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of cardiac arrest survivors admitted to a US academic medical center between 2013 and 2021 who had an EEG background of burst suppression. EEG and clinical features were extracted from our institutional review board-approved repositories. EEG features were qualitatively and quantitatively rated at 0, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h following initiation of monitoring. Qualitative visual assessment occurred, blinded to all clinical features, including outcomes, and in accordance with the current American Clinical Neurophysiology Society definition. Quantitative assessment involved manual marking of 50 consecutive pairs of bursts and interburst intervals (IBIs) for analysis. Similarity of bursts/IBIs were assessed with correlation coefficients. The primary clinical outcome was survival to hospital discharge. Comparisons were performed between groups, and a multivariate model was generated for significant variables.

Results: Of 593 cardiac arrest patients, 203 (34.2%) had burst suppression. Thirty-one (15.3%) patients with burst suppression survived. IBs were detected in 80 patients (39.4% of burst suppression). No patient with qualitatively identified IBs had a good neurological outcome (76 deceased, 4 in a state of unresponsive wakefulness). Whereas 11 of 123 (8.9%) with burst suppression without IB had Cerebral Performance Category scores of 1-2. Quantitative analysis of 268 instances of burst suppression demonstrated that mortality was associated with longer bursts, longer IBIs, and higher burst correlation coefficients (i.e., bursts that were more similar to each other) only when allowing analysis of the first 2 s of bursts. Binary logistic regression showed that the only independent EEG predictor of mortality was the burst correlation coefficient measured over 2 s (adjusted odds ratio 4.82 [95% confidence interval 1.21-8.42], p = 0.009).

Conclusions: Using a single-center US cohort, IBs within 72 h post cardiac arrest were strongly associated with poor outcomes. Quantitative analysis revealed that including the first 2 s of the bursts was superior to limiting the analysis to 0.5-1 s.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信