Female Athlete Triad Knowledge and the Risk of Low Energy Availability and Disordered Eating in Recreationally Active and Competitive Adult Females.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Samantha J Goldenstein, Lenka H Shriver, Laurie Wideman
{"title":"Female Athlete Triad Knowledge and the Risk of Low Energy Availability and Disordered Eating in Recreationally Active and Competitive Adult Females.","authors":"Samantha J Goldenstein, Lenka H Shriver, Laurie Wideman","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To examine and compare the knowledge related to the female athlete triad and the signs and symptoms of low energy availability (LEA) and disordered eating (DE) in competitive (CO) and recreationally active (RA) females. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Premenopausal females (<i>n</i> = 631, age 25 ± 7 years) completed an electronic survey that assessed female athlete triad knowledge and risk for LEA and DE. Participants self-selected as CO (<i>n</i> = 123) or RA (<i>n</i> = 508). Logistic regression examined the associations between membership in RA versus CO (reference group) and knowledge related to the female athlete triad. Linear regression assessed the association of group membership as predictor variables with LEA and DE risk scores. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Only 22% of participants were familiar with the female athlete triad term and almost half the total participants were at risk for LEA (45%) and/or DE (45%). The RA group was less likely to be familiar with the female athlete triad than CO (odds ratio = 0.34, confidence interval [CI]: 0.22, 0.53, <i>p</i> < 0.001), yet group membership did not predict risk for LEA (β = -0.57, CI: -1.42, 0.28, <i>p</i> = 0.19) or DE (β = 1.34, CI: -1.72, 4.39, <i>p</i> = 0.39). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> There is a lack of knowledge related to the female athlete triad, coupled with a relatively high prevalence of LEA and DE risk among physically active females, regardless of athletic status (CO vs. RA). Given the high prevalence of LEA and DE risk found in our study, expanding nutrition education and awareness of the health consequences of the female athlete triad to all physically active females is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0855","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine and compare the knowledge related to the female athlete triad and the signs and symptoms of low energy availability (LEA) and disordered eating (DE) in competitive (CO) and recreationally active (RA) females. Methods: Premenopausal females (n = 631, age 25 ± 7 years) completed an electronic survey that assessed female athlete triad knowledge and risk for LEA and DE. Participants self-selected as CO (n = 123) or RA (n = 508). Logistic regression examined the associations between membership in RA versus CO (reference group) and knowledge related to the female athlete triad. Linear regression assessed the association of group membership as predictor variables with LEA and DE risk scores. Results: Only 22% of participants were familiar with the female athlete triad term and almost half the total participants were at risk for LEA (45%) and/or DE (45%). The RA group was less likely to be familiar with the female athlete triad than CO (odds ratio = 0.34, confidence interval [CI]: 0.22, 0.53, p < 0.001), yet group membership did not predict risk for LEA (β = -0.57, CI: -1.42, 0.28, p = 0.19) or DE (β = 1.34, CI: -1.72, 4.39, p = 0.39). Conclusion: There is a lack of knowledge related to the female athlete triad, coupled with a relatively high prevalence of LEA and DE risk among physically active females, regardless of athletic status (CO vs. RA). Given the high prevalence of LEA and DE risk found in our study, expanding nutrition education and awareness of the health consequences of the female athlete triad to all physically active females is warranted.

女运动员三位一体知识与娱乐好胜成年女性低能量可用性和饮食失调的风险。
目的:探讨和比较竞技型(CO)和娱乐型(RA)女性运动员三联征相关知识和低能量有效度(LEA)、饮食失调(DE)的体征和症状。方法:绝经前女性(n = 631,年龄25±7岁)完成了一项电子调查,评估了女性运动员的三联征知识和LEA和DE的风险。参与者自选为CO (n = 123)或RA (n = 508)。Logistic回归检验了RA与CO(参照组)成员与女运动员黑社会相关知识之间的关系。线性回归评估群体成员作为预测变量与LEA和DE风险评分的关联。结果:只有22%的参与者熟悉女性运动员三位联术语,几乎一半的参与者有LEA(45%)和/或DE(45%)的风险。RA组比CO组更不可能熟悉女运动员三联征(优势比= 0.34,可信区间[CI]: 0.22, 0.53, p < 0.001),但分组成员资格并不能预测LEA (β = -0.57, CI: -1.42, 0.28, p = 0.19)或DE (β = 1.34, CI: -1.72, 4.39, p = 0.39)的风险。结论:缺乏与女性运动员黑社会相关的知识,加上在体育活动的女性中,LEA和DE风险的患病率相对较高,无论运动状态如何(CO与RA)。鉴于我们研究中发现的LEA和DE的高患病率,有必要扩大对所有体育运动女性的营养教育和对女性运动员三联征健康后果的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of women's health
Journal of women's health 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Women''s Health is the primary source of information for meeting the challenges of providing optimal health care for women throughout their lifespan. The Journal delivers cutting-edge advancements in diagnostic procedures, therapeutic protocols for the management of diseases, and innovative research in gender-based biology that impacts patient care and treatment. Journal of Women’s Health coverage includes: -Internal Medicine Endocrinology- Cardiology- Oncology- Obstetrics/Gynecology- Urogynecology- Psychiatry- Neurology- Nutrition- Sex-Based Biology- Complementary Medicine- Sports Medicine- Surgery- Medical Education- Public Policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信