Patellar tendon repair restores extensor mechanism function with a low complication rate: A systematic review

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Udit Dave , Jared Rubin , Nicole Chang , Andrew S. Bi , Myles Atkins , Fernando Gómez-Verdejo , Nikhil N. Verma , Jorge Chahla
{"title":"Patellar tendon repair restores extensor mechanism function with a low complication rate: A systematic review","authors":"Udit Dave ,&nbsp;Jared Rubin ,&nbsp;Nicole Chang ,&nbsp;Andrew S. Bi ,&nbsp;Myles Atkins ,&nbsp;Fernando Gómez-Verdejo ,&nbsp;Nikhil N. Verma ,&nbsp;Jorge Chahla","doi":"10.1016/j.jor.2025.01.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The patellar tendon plays a crucial role in knee extension and lower extremity mobility. Although PT ruptures are rare, they result in severe loss of function when untreated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and functional outcomes and complications following primary, acute patellar tendon (PT) repair.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched in August 2024 for studies published after 2004. Studies were included if they met these criteria: evaluated patients who underwent acute PT repair with any technique including for mid-substance tear or avulsion, were prospective or retrospective studies, and reported functional outcomes or complications. Studies not written in English were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The initial screen identified 1737 studies, 9 of which were included in this systematic review. There were three retrospective cohort studies, three retrospective case series, one retrospective case control study, and two prospective case series. Each study had low risk of bias. A total of 970 patients (93.8 % males) were included. Mean age across studies ranged from 32.1 to 44.6 years. Five included studies reported on mean extension at follow-up, ranging from 0 to 6.4 degrees of extension. Five included studies reported on mean flexion at follow-up, ranging from 128.5 to 143.3 degrees of flexion. The range of re-rupture and re-operation were 0–21.4 % with an overall re-rupture rate of 3.9 % and an overall re-operation rate of 5.7 %. Only one study reported a significant difference in re-rupture rates with transosseous repair versus suture anchor repair (7.5 % versus 0 % respectively). Other complications identified were venous thromboembolism (VTE) (0–5.0 %), stiffness (0–35.0 %), hardware discomfort (0–5.0 %), and infection (0–5.0 %).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patellar tendon repair with both transosseous and suture anchor technique restores range of motion in patients post-operatively with a low complication rate. Decisions regarding operative technique should be tailored to individual patient characteristics and surgeon preferences.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>Level IV, systematic review of level III-IV studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of orthopaedics","volume":"66 ","pages":"Pages 146-153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0972978X2500011X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The patellar tendon plays a crucial role in knee extension and lower extremity mobility. Although PT ruptures are rare, they result in severe loss of function when untreated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and functional outcomes and complications following primary, acute patellar tendon (PT) repair.

Methods

In accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched in August 2024 for studies published after 2004. Studies were included if they met these criteria: evaluated patients who underwent acute PT repair with any technique including for mid-substance tear or avulsion, were prospective or retrospective studies, and reported functional outcomes or complications. Studies not written in English were excluded.

Results

The initial screen identified 1737 studies, 9 of which were included in this systematic review. There were three retrospective cohort studies, three retrospective case series, one retrospective case control study, and two prospective case series. Each study had low risk of bias. A total of 970 patients (93.8 % males) were included. Mean age across studies ranged from 32.1 to 44.6 years. Five included studies reported on mean extension at follow-up, ranging from 0 to 6.4 degrees of extension. Five included studies reported on mean flexion at follow-up, ranging from 128.5 to 143.3 degrees of flexion. The range of re-rupture and re-operation were 0–21.4 % with an overall re-rupture rate of 3.9 % and an overall re-operation rate of 5.7 %. Only one study reported a significant difference in re-rupture rates with transosseous repair versus suture anchor repair (7.5 % versus 0 % respectively). Other complications identified were venous thromboembolism (VTE) (0–5.0 %), stiffness (0–35.0 %), hardware discomfort (0–5.0 %), and infection (0–5.0 %).

Conclusions

Patellar tendon repair with both transosseous and suture anchor technique restores range of motion in patients post-operatively with a low complication rate. Decisions regarding operative technique should be tailored to individual patient characteristics and surgeon preferences.

Level of evidence

Level IV, systematic review of level III-IV studies.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
202
审稿时长
56 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedics aims to be a leading journal in orthopaedics and contribute towards the improvement of quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research work and review articles related to different aspects of orthopaedics including Arthroplasty, Arthroscopy, Sports Medicine, Trauma, Spine and Spinal deformities, Pediatric orthopaedics, limb reconstruction procedures, hand surgery, and orthopaedic oncology. It also publishes articles on continuing education, health-related information, case reports and letters to the editor. It is requested to note that the journal has an international readership and all submissions should be aimed at specifying something about the setting in which the work was conducted. Authors must also provide any specific reasons for the research and also provide an elaborate description of the results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信