The Optimal Physical Recovery After Hospitalization (OPRAH) intervention to improve physical activity and protein intake after oncological surgery: a feasibility study.
Marijke de Leeuwerk, Suzanne Ten Dam, Marieke van der Heide, Hinke Kruizenga, Edwin Geleijn, Vincent de Groot, Marike van der Leeden, Marike van der Schaaf
{"title":"The Optimal Physical Recovery After Hospitalization (OPRAH) intervention to improve physical activity and protein intake after oncological surgery: a feasibility study.","authors":"Marijke de Leeuwerk, Suzanne Ten Dam, Marieke van der Heide, Hinke Kruizenga, Edwin Geleijn, Vincent de Groot, Marike van der Leeden, Marike van der Schaaf","doi":"10.1080/09638288.2025.2456583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>(1) To assess the feasibility of a blended intervention, combining a smartphone app for self-monitoring of physical activity and protein intake with coaching from a physiotherapist and dietician after hospitalization and (2) to evaluate the associated study procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-arm feasibility study was performed with adult patients scheduled for curative intent gastrointestinal or lung cancer surgery. Patients were provided with a smartphone app and accelerometer one week before surgery, which they used for six weeks following discharge. In addition, patients received coaching from a physiotherapist and dietician. Feasibility was assessed by evaluating participation and completion rates, user adherence, system usability score (SUS), as well as experiences and safety, based on predefined criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 32 patients were included, with participation and completion rates of 69 and 75%, respectively. User adherence to wearing the accelerometer was deemed satisfactory (91%), while user adherence to protein intake was suboptimal (59%). The mean SUS was acceptable (73.5). Patient experiences were predominantly positive, although some patients mentioned a lack of options in the protein registration tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The intervention is feasible for implementation in a larger study. To improve adherence, modifications are needed regarding self-recording of protein intake. Study procedures require minor modifications.</p>","PeriodicalId":50575,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2456583","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: (1) To assess the feasibility of a blended intervention, combining a smartphone app for self-monitoring of physical activity and protein intake with coaching from a physiotherapist and dietician after hospitalization and (2) to evaluate the associated study procedures.
Methods: A single-arm feasibility study was performed with adult patients scheduled for curative intent gastrointestinal or lung cancer surgery. Patients were provided with a smartphone app and accelerometer one week before surgery, which they used for six weeks following discharge. In addition, patients received coaching from a physiotherapist and dietician. Feasibility was assessed by evaluating participation and completion rates, user adherence, system usability score (SUS), as well as experiences and safety, based on predefined criteria.
Results: In total, 32 patients were included, with participation and completion rates of 69 and 75%, respectively. User adherence to wearing the accelerometer was deemed satisfactory (91%), while user adherence to protein intake was suboptimal (59%). The mean SUS was acceptable (73.5). Patient experiences were predominantly positive, although some patients mentioned a lack of options in the protein registration tool.
Conclusion: The intervention is feasible for implementation in a larger study. To improve adherence, modifications are needed regarding self-recording of protein intake. Study procedures require minor modifications.
期刊介绍:
Disability and Rehabilitation along with Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology are international multidisciplinary journals which seek to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of disability and to promote rehabilitation science, practice and policy aspects of the rehabilitation process.