Hiatal sling liver retraction technique in bariatric and upper gastrointestinal surgeries - Our 15 year experience with 1874 surgeries.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Muvva Sri Harsha, Raj Palaniappan, Nikhilesh Krishna
{"title":"Hiatal sling liver retraction technique in bariatric and upper gastrointestinal surgeries - Our 15 year experience with 1874 surgeries.","authors":"Muvva Sri Harsha, Raj Palaniappan, Nikhilesh Krishna","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_97_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Liver retraction is an important aspect when performing minimal access surgeries, especially bariatric and upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgeries. Various liver retraction methods are available and have been tried. Here, we present our experience with our indigenous hiatal sling technique for liver retraction and compare it with Nathanson liver retractor which is a popular and commonly used liver retraction method.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective observational study of 1874 patients who underwent bariatric and upper GI surgeries over the last 15 years since September 2009. A secondary study was conducted amongst the two groups of patients who underwent upper GI and bariatric surgeries using hiatal sling technique and Nathanson retractor system for liver retraction between January 2023 and October 2023. End points measured were time taken, conversions and complication along with liver function tests (LFTs) such as aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine transaminase measured between the two groups pre- and postoperatively day 0, day 1, day 3 and day 7.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our series of 1874 patients, hiatal sling liver traction was possible without any difficulties in all except 2 patients with no associated liver injury and with adequate exposure. In the comparative study, patients in the hiatal sling group (Group B) had significantly lesser elevation in LFTs as compared to the patients in the Nathanson liver retraction group (Group A), with no adverse events in both the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hiatal sling technique for liver retraction is an effective technique which provides adequate exposure of the hiatus and causes lesser liver insult compared to rigid liver retraction system like Nathanson liver retraction system. Hiatal sling does not interfere with surgeons' field causing less errors during surgery and thus making it more ergonomic friendly.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_97_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Liver retraction is an important aspect when performing minimal access surgeries, especially bariatric and upper gastrointestinal (GI) surgeries. Various liver retraction methods are available and have been tried. Here, we present our experience with our indigenous hiatal sling technique for liver retraction and compare it with Nathanson liver retractor which is a popular and commonly used liver retraction method.

Patients and methods: This is a retrospective observational study of 1874 patients who underwent bariatric and upper GI surgeries over the last 15 years since September 2009. A secondary study was conducted amongst the two groups of patients who underwent upper GI and bariatric surgeries using hiatal sling technique and Nathanson retractor system for liver retraction between January 2023 and October 2023. End points measured were time taken, conversions and complication along with liver function tests (LFTs) such as aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine transaminase measured between the two groups pre- and postoperatively day 0, day 1, day 3 and day 7.

Results: In our series of 1874 patients, hiatal sling liver traction was possible without any difficulties in all except 2 patients with no associated liver injury and with adequate exposure. In the comparative study, patients in the hiatal sling group (Group B) had significantly lesser elevation in LFTs as compared to the patients in the Nathanson liver retraction group (Group A), with no adverse events in both the groups.

Conclusion: Hiatal sling technique for liver retraction is an effective technique which provides adequate exposure of the hiatus and causes lesser liver insult compared to rigid liver retraction system like Nathanson liver retraction system. Hiatal sling does not interfere with surgeons' field causing less errors during surgery and thus making it more ergonomic friendly.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Minimal Access Surgery (JMAS), the official publication of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons, launched in early 2005. The JMAS, a quarterly publication, is the first English-language journal from India, as also from this part of the world, dedicated to Minimal Access Surgery. The JMAS boasts an outstanding editorial board comprising of Indian and international experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信