Descriptive analysis of the efficacity of R-GEMOX /R-IE/R-CEPP in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) transplant-ineligible diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Baptiste Fulbert, Théo Vincent, Justine Clarenne, Imman Abdelouahab, Antoine Le Bozec, Eric Durot, Florian Slimano
{"title":"Descriptive analysis of the efficacity of R-GEMOX /R-IE/R-CEPP in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) transplant-ineligible diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).","authors":"Baptiste Fulbert, Théo Vincent, Justine Clarenne, Imman Abdelouahab, Antoine Le Bozec, Eric Durot, Florian Slimano","doi":"10.1177/10781552241313381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) ineligible for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) may benefit from a second line anticancer drug regimen but real-life outcomes are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the efficacity of 3 anticancer drug regimens (Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin GEMOX; Ifosfamide and Etoposide IE; Cyclophosphamide, Etoposide, Procarbazine and Prednisone CEPP) combined with Rituximab (R-) in terms of progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS).</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Retrospective study including R/R DLBCL patients HSCT ineligible who received at least one cycle of R-GEMOX, R-IE or R-CEPP between 2010 and 2022. Demographic, clinical, biological and survival data were collected. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify associated variables with survival outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-two patients (median age 78 [40-102] with predominantly stage III-IV DLBCL (n = 49, 79%), non-germinal center-B like (n = 27, 44%) were included. Median OS and PFS were 9 (CI95% [3-10]) and 4 months (CI95% [2-13]) for R-GEMOX, 4 (CI95% [2-6]) and 1 month (CI95% [1-4]) for R-IE and 5 (CI95% [3-6]) and 3 months (CI95% [2-15]) for R-CEPP, respectively. Univariate analysis selects ECOG, aa-IPI scores, LDH rate and Ann-Arbor stage with no independently association in multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All three regimens show modest survival benefit especially between last anticancer treatment course and death. Emergence of bispecific antibodies and Cart-cells for which real-life benefits have yet to be demonstrated could be coupled with improved access to early palliative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"10781552241313381"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552241313381","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) ineligible for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) may benefit from a second line anticancer drug regimen but real-life outcomes are lacking.

Objective: To describe the efficacity of 3 anticancer drug regimens (Gemcitabine and Oxaliplatin GEMOX; Ifosfamide and Etoposide IE; Cyclophosphamide, Etoposide, Procarbazine and Prednisone CEPP) combined with Rituximab (R-) in terms of progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Patients: Retrospective study including R/R DLBCL patients HSCT ineligible who received at least one cycle of R-GEMOX, R-IE or R-CEPP between 2010 and 2022. Demographic, clinical, biological and survival data were collected. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify associated variables with survival outcomes.

Results: Sixty-two patients (median age 78 [40-102] with predominantly stage III-IV DLBCL (n = 49, 79%), non-germinal center-B like (n = 27, 44%) were included. Median OS and PFS were 9 (CI95% [3-10]) and 4 months (CI95% [2-13]) for R-GEMOX, 4 (CI95% [2-6]) and 1 month (CI95% [1-4]) for R-IE and 5 (CI95% [3-6]) and 3 months (CI95% [2-15]) for R-CEPP, respectively. Univariate analysis selects ECOG, aa-IPI scores, LDH rate and Ann-Arbor stage with no independently association in multivariate analysis.

Conclusion: All three regimens show modest survival benefit especially between last anticancer treatment course and death. Emergence of bispecific antibodies and Cart-cells for which real-life benefits have yet to be demonstrated could be coupled with improved access to early palliative care.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
276
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信