Sophia Schaller, Christina Schumann, Dorothee Arlt
{"title":"Dynamic Relations Between Negative News Media Experiences and Mental Distress? Examining Transactional Effects During Times of Health Crises.","authors":"Sophia Schaller, Christina Schumann, Dorothee Arlt","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2025.2457557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current study concentrates on individual's media experiences during public health crises - especially media experiences of fear and issue fatigue regarding COVID-19 news media coverage - and their relationship to mental distress. Specifically, we aim to examine potential transactional effects and ask whether media experiences are only a cause or also a consequence of mental distress throughout a health crisis. Utilizing a three-wave panel survey of German citizens (<i>n</i> = 856), the study employs two random intercept cross-lagged panel models (RI-CLPMs). RI-CLPMs distinguish stable between-person differences from temporal within-person changes, facilitating a nuanced understanding of transactional dynamics. Our study shows distinct relationships between media experiences and mental distress. While the respondents' experiences of issue fatigue led to subsequent changes in their depressive symptoms, which, in turn, influenced subsequent changes in their issue fatigue at the within-person level, media-related fear experience was strongly associated with depressive symptoms only at the between-person level. Thus, our findings demonstrate a causal transactional relationship between media experiences of issue fatigue and mental distress that evolves over time. Media experiences of fear, however, appear to be a consequence of trait-like differences between individuals rather than a result of intraindividual change.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2457557","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The current study concentrates on individual's media experiences during public health crises - especially media experiences of fear and issue fatigue regarding COVID-19 news media coverage - and their relationship to mental distress. Specifically, we aim to examine potential transactional effects and ask whether media experiences are only a cause or also a consequence of mental distress throughout a health crisis. Utilizing a three-wave panel survey of German citizens (n = 856), the study employs two random intercept cross-lagged panel models (RI-CLPMs). RI-CLPMs distinguish stable between-person differences from temporal within-person changes, facilitating a nuanced understanding of transactional dynamics. Our study shows distinct relationships between media experiences and mental distress. While the respondents' experiences of issue fatigue led to subsequent changes in their depressive symptoms, which, in turn, influenced subsequent changes in their issue fatigue at the within-person level, media-related fear experience was strongly associated with depressive symptoms only at the between-person level. Thus, our findings demonstrate a causal transactional relationship between media experiences of issue fatigue and mental distress that evolves over time. Media experiences of fear, however, appear to be a consequence of trait-like differences between individuals rather than a result of intraindividual change.
期刊介绍:
As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.