Autologous bone grafting combined with spheroid-based matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects of the knee: Good clinical outcomes alongside abnormal postoperative gait patterns.

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Stephan Oehme, Danko Dan Milinkovic, Azzurra Paolucci, Sophie Krafzick, Stephen Fahy, Philipp Damm, Tobias Winkler, Tobias Jung, Benjamin Bartek
{"title":"Autologous bone grafting combined with spheroid-based matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects of the knee: Good clinical outcomes alongside abnormal postoperative gait patterns.","authors":"Stephan Oehme, Danko Dan Milinkovic, Azzurra Paolucci, Sophie Krafzick, Stephen Fahy, Philipp Damm, Tobias Winkler, Tobias Jung, Benjamin Bartek","doi":"10.1002/ksa.12605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of autologous bone grafting with spheroid-based matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MABCI) for osteochondral defects of the knee by analysing pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Postoperative gait analysis was conducted and compared with a matched healthy control group to investigate biomechanical deviations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 35 patients (m: 21, f: 14; mean defect size: 4.2 ± 2.4 cm², localisation: femoral condyle: 31, patellofemoral: 5) were analysed. The mean follow-up was 42.6 ± 22.8 months. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), PROMIS 29 profile, and a questionnaire on patient perception of treatment success were assessed to evaluate PROMs. 3D-instrumented gait analysis (GRAIL, Motek) was used to assess lower extremity kinematics, kinetics and vertical ground reaction forces, compared to sex-, age- and body mass index-matched healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All clinical scores showed significant improvement compared to the preoperative condition (IKDC: 73.1 ± 10.1 vs. 56.6 ± 17.2, p < 0.01; KOOS subcategories: pain 82.0 [±12.7] vs. 70.7 [±16.7] [p < 0.01], symptoms 79.1 [±20.3] vs. 68.9 [±13.9] [p < 0.01], activities of daily living 90.1 [±11.2] vs. 80.5 [±15.6] [p < 0.01], sport and recreational function: 65.3 [±19.3] vs. 51.3 [±26.29] [p < 0.01], quality of life 52.2 [±18.6] vs. 42.6 [±18.6] [p < 0.01]; numeric pain rating scale: 2.7 ± 2.0 vs. 5.0 ± 2.5, p < 0.01). The analysed patients reported a high satisfaction rate (94.3%). Self-selected walking speed was significantly lower than in healthy controls (1.17 ± 0.17 m/s vs. 0.98 ± 0.18 m/s, p < 0.01). Peak knee flexion angle (PKA) during loading response was significantly smaller (9.6° ± 7.0 vs. 17.7° ± 4.6, p < 0.01), and knee extension moment was significantly reduced (0.1 Nm/kg ± 0.2 vs. 0.4 Nm/kg ± 0.2, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MABCI is an effective treatment for osteochondral knee defects, showing significant improvements in all evaluated PROMs. Postoperative gait analysis revealed abnormal gait patterns, including reduced PKA and lower knee extension moment, suggesting a need for further rehabilitation to optimise functional recovery.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III.</p>","PeriodicalId":17880,"journal":{"name":"Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12605","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of autologous bone grafting with spheroid-based matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MABCI) for osteochondral defects of the knee by analysing pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Postoperative gait analysis was conducted and compared with a matched healthy control group to investigate biomechanical deviations.

Methods: A total of 35 patients (m: 21, f: 14; mean defect size: 4.2 ± 2.4 cm², localisation: femoral condyle: 31, patellofemoral: 5) were analysed. The mean follow-up was 42.6 ± 22.8 months. International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), PROMIS 29 profile, and a questionnaire on patient perception of treatment success were assessed to evaluate PROMs. 3D-instrumented gait analysis (GRAIL, Motek) was used to assess lower extremity kinematics, kinetics and vertical ground reaction forces, compared to sex-, age- and body mass index-matched healthy controls.

Results: All clinical scores showed significant improvement compared to the preoperative condition (IKDC: 73.1 ± 10.1 vs. 56.6 ± 17.2, p < 0.01; KOOS subcategories: pain 82.0 [±12.7] vs. 70.7 [±16.7] [p < 0.01], symptoms 79.1 [±20.3] vs. 68.9 [±13.9] [p < 0.01], activities of daily living 90.1 [±11.2] vs. 80.5 [±15.6] [p < 0.01], sport and recreational function: 65.3 [±19.3] vs. 51.3 [±26.29] [p < 0.01], quality of life 52.2 [±18.6] vs. 42.6 [±18.6] [p < 0.01]; numeric pain rating scale: 2.7 ± 2.0 vs. 5.0 ± 2.5, p < 0.01). The analysed patients reported a high satisfaction rate (94.3%). Self-selected walking speed was significantly lower than in healthy controls (1.17 ± 0.17 m/s vs. 0.98 ± 0.18 m/s, p < 0.01). Peak knee flexion angle (PKA) during loading response was significantly smaller (9.6° ± 7.0 vs. 17.7° ± 4.6, p < 0.01), and knee extension moment was significantly reduced (0.1 Nm/kg ± 0.2 vs. 0.4 Nm/kg ± 0.2, p < 0.01).

Conclusion: MABCI is an effective treatment for osteochondral knee defects, showing significant improvements in all evaluated PROMs. Postoperative gait analysis revealed abnormal gait patterns, including reduced PKA and lower knee extension moment, suggesting a need for further rehabilitation to optimise functional recovery.

Level of evidence: Level III.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
18.40%
发文量
418
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Few other areas of orthopedic surgery and traumatology have undergone such a dramatic evolution in the last 10 years as knee surgery, arthroscopy and sports traumatology. Ranked among the top 33% of journals in both Orthopedics and Sports Sciences, the goal of this European journal is to publish papers about innovative knee surgery, sports trauma surgery and arthroscopy. Each issue features a series of peer-reviewed articles that deal with diagnosis and management and with basic research. Each issue also contains at least one review article about an important clinical problem. Case presentations or short notes about technical innovations are also accepted for publication. The articles cover all aspects of knee surgery and all types of sports trauma; in addition, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment and prevention, and all types of arthroscopy (not only the knee but also the shoulder, elbow, wrist, hip, ankle, etc.) are addressed. Articles on new diagnostic techniques such as MRI and ultrasound and high-quality articles about the biomechanics of joints, muscles and tendons are included. Although this is largely a clinical journal, it is also open to basic research with clinical relevance. Because the journal is supported by a distinguished European Editorial Board, assisted by an international Advisory Board, you can be assured that the journal maintains the highest standards. Official Clinical Journal of the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信