Xianzhe Jia, Margaret G. Kivelson, Krishan K. Khurana, Raymond J. Walker
{"title":"Improved Models of Ganymede's Permanent and Induced Magnetic Fields Based on Galileo and Juno Data","authors":"Xianzhe Jia, Margaret G. Kivelson, Krishan K. Khurana, Raymond J. Walker","doi":"10.1029/2024JE008309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Near Ganymede, the magnetic field is a superposition of Jupiter's magnetospheric magnetic field, the field arising from sources within the moon, the field generated by plasma currents driven by the interaction of flowing magnetospheric plasma with the conducting moon, and the field arising from ionospheric currents. Previous fits to Ganymede's internal field have not identified the contributions of plasma and ionospheric currents, although their contributions can obscure the signature of sources internal to the moon. Fortunately, using magnetohydrodynamic simulations whose output agrees well with the measurements acquired on close passes by Galileo and Juno, we can estimate the moon-scale contributions of plasma sources. By subtracting the magnetic signatures of plasma and ionospheric currents from the measured field, we approximate measurements made in a current-free region. We fit the corrected data from different sets of flybys either as a sum of low order spherical harmonics or as a permanent dipole moment plus an induced dipole with approximately the same root-mean-square errors. For the induced dipole model, data from multiple flybys occurring at different phases of Jupiter's rotation are used to represent the time-variation of the external field at Ganymede. Compared with earlier estimates, the magnitude of the permanent dipole moment did not significantly change in either analysis. However, for the permanent plus induced dipole model, the induction efficiency decreases from 0.84 to ∼0.72. The reduced efficiency places new constraints on the thickness of the ice shell above the ocean and the ocean's depth and conductivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":16101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","volume":"130 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JE008309","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JE008309","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Near Ganymede, the magnetic field is a superposition of Jupiter's magnetospheric magnetic field, the field arising from sources within the moon, the field generated by plasma currents driven by the interaction of flowing magnetospheric plasma with the conducting moon, and the field arising from ionospheric currents. Previous fits to Ganymede's internal field have not identified the contributions of plasma and ionospheric currents, although their contributions can obscure the signature of sources internal to the moon. Fortunately, using magnetohydrodynamic simulations whose output agrees well with the measurements acquired on close passes by Galileo and Juno, we can estimate the moon-scale contributions of plasma sources. By subtracting the magnetic signatures of plasma and ionospheric currents from the measured field, we approximate measurements made in a current-free region. We fit the corrected data from different sets of flybys either as a sum of low order spherical harmonics or as a permanent dipole moment plus an induced dipole with approximately the same root-mean-square errors. For the induced dipole model, data from multiple flybys occurring at different phases of Jupiter's rotation are used to represent the time-variation of the external field at Ganymede. Compared with earlier estimates, the magnitude of the permanent dipole moment did not significantly change in either analysis. However, for the permanent plus induced dipole model, the induction efficiency decreases from 0.84 to ∼0.72. The reduced efficiency places new constraints on the thickness of the ice shell above the ocean and the ocean's depth and conductivity.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geophysical Research Planets is dedicated to the publication of new and original research in the broad field of planetary science. Manuscripts concerning planetary geology, geophysics, geochemistry, atmospheres, and dynamics are appropriate for the journal when they increase knowledge about the processes that affect Solar System objects. Manuscripts concerning other planetary systems, exoplanets or Earth are welcome when presented in a comparative planetology perspective. Studies in the field of astrobiology will be considered when they have immediate consequences for the interpretation of planetary data. JGR: Planets does not publish manuscripts that deal with future missions and instrumentation, nor those that are primarily of an engineering interest. Instrument, calibration or data processing papers may be appropriate for the journal, but only when accompanied by scientific analysis and interpretation that increases understanding of the studied object. A manuscript that describes a new method or technique would be acceptable for JGR: Planets if it contained new and relevant scientific results obtained using the method. Review articles are generally not appropriate for JGR: Planets, but they may be considered if they form an integral part of a special issue.