Forage rotation and tillage effects on soil physical and chemical properties

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRONOMY
Johnathan D. Holman, Payton S. Mauler, Augustine K. Obour, Kraig L. Roozeboom, Logan M. Simon, Yared Assefa
{"title":"Forage rotation and tillage effects on soil physical and chemical properties","authors":"Johnathan D. Holman,&nbsp;Payton S. Mauler,&nbsp;Augustine K. Obour,&nbsp;Kraig L. Roozeboom,&nbsp;Logan M. Simon,&nbsp;Yared Assefa","doi":"10.1002/agg2.70031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Annual forages can be grown more intensively than grain crops, which may have negative impacts on soil health because of biomass removal. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of annual forage crop rotations of varying intensity, diversity, forage removal, and associated tillage practices on soil physical and chemical properties. A long-term forage study was conducted near Garden City, KS. The six rotation and tillage combination treatments of the study were (1) forage sorghum (<i>Sorghum bicolor</i> (L.) Moench)–forage sorghum (FS–FS) no-tillage (NT), (2) triticale (×<i>Triticosecale</i> Wittm. ex <i>A. Camus</i> [<i>Secale × Triticum</i>])/FS–FS–oat (<i>Avena sativa</i> L.; T/FS–FS–O) reduced till (RT), (3) T/FS-FS-O NT, (4) T/FS–FS–FS-O NT, (5) T/FS–FS–FS–O RT, and (6) T–FS–O NT. Soil samples were taken in 2021 and 2022 at depths of 0–5 cm and 5–15 cm from the experimental plots and adjacent land used for grain production in a wheat-sorghum-fallow rotation. Results of the study indicated that the less intense rotation, T-FS-O, had more water stable microaggregates, the grain control had smaller macroaggregates, and T/FS-FS-O RT had larger macroaggregates and tended to have fewer small aggregates. Similarly, diverse forage rotations like T-FS-FS-FS-O had larger sized (2.0–6.3 mm) dry aggregates and tended to have fewer smaller aggregates. The grain control had more medium sized (0.42–0.84 mm) dry aggregate than T/FS-FS-O RT. Soil total nitrogen concentrations were less for less diverse or less intense forage rotations compared with the grain control, and soil organic carbon (SOC) and P were less for all forages compared with the grain control, perhaps because forage harvesting reduced crop residue cover and organic matter cycling. We conclude that forage systems that remove biomass from the field should be integrated with management that leaves more residue on the soil surface, such as allowing forage regrowth after hay harvest, alternating between hay removal and grazing, or rotating between forage and grain crops to keep more residue on the soil surface to maintain SOC and protect the soil from erosion.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.70031","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agg2.70031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Annual forages can be grown more intensively than grain crops, which may have negative impacts on soil health because of biomass removal. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of annual forage crop rotations of varying intensity, diversity, forage removal, and associated tillage practices on soil physical and chemical properties. A long-term forage study was conducted near Garden City, KS. The six rotation and tillage combination treatments of the study were (1) forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench)–forage sorghum (FS–FS) no-tillage (NT), (2) triticale (×Triticosecale Wittm. ex A. Camus [Secale × Triticum])/FS–FS–oat (Avena sativa L.; T/FS–FS–O) reduced till (RT), (3) T/FS-FS-O NT, (4) T/FS–FS–FS-O NT, (5) T/FS–FS–FS–O RT, and (6) T–FS–O NT. Soil samples were taken in 2021 and 2022 at depths of 0–5 cm and 5–15 cm from the experimental plots and adjacent land used for grain production in a wheat-sorghum-fallow rotation. Results of the study indicated that the less intense rotation, T-FS-O, had more water stable microaggregates, the grain control had smaller macroaggregates, and T/FS-FS-O RT had larger macroaggregates and tended to have fewer small aggregates. Similarly, diverse forage rotations like T-FS-FS-FS-O had larger sized (2.0–6.3 mm) dry aggregates and tended to have fewer smaller aggregates. The grain control had more medium sized (0.42–0.84 mm) dry aggregate than T/FS-FS-O RT. Soil total nitrogen concentrations were less for less diverse or less intense forage rotations compared with the grain control, and soil organic carbon (SOC) and P were less for all forages compared with the grain control, perhaps because forage harvesting reduced crop residue cover and organic matter cycling. We conclude that forage systems that remove biomass from the field should be integrated with management that leaves more residue on the soil surface, such as allowing forage regrowth after hay harvest, alternating between hay removal and grazing, or rotating between forage and grain crops to keep more residue on the soil surface to maintain SOC and protect the soil from erosion.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信