A Hedonic Sensory Trial: Exploring the Relationship Between Sweet-Liker Status, Demographics, and Health Measures on Acceptability in a Beverage System

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Jessica Cartwright, Heather E. Smyth, Michael E. Netzel, Yasmina F. Sultanbawa, Olivia R. L. Wright
{"title":"A Hedonic Sensory Trial: Exploring the Relationship Between Sweet-Liker Status, Demographics, and Health Measures on Acceptability in a Beverage System","authors":"Jessica Cartwright,&nbsp;Heather E. Smyth,&nbsp;Michael E. Netzel,&nbsp;Yasmina F. Sultanbawa,&nbsp;Olivia R. L. Wright","doi":"10.1111/joss.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is concern that high sugar-sweetened beverage consumption may reduce the intake of more nutritionally dense foods and lead to a higher risk of chronic diseases, particularly for vulnerable populations, including First Nations People. The current study investigates consumer acceptability of five carbonated beverages with a range of sugar contents (0%–11.5%) including novel low-sugar formulations with bush fruits and commercial soft drink comparators. The results from 142 consumers reveal the full sugar soft drink (11.5% sugar) had the highest acceptability, closely followed by the low sugar novel formulation (5.9% sugar). The consumer cluster “full sugar soft drink likers” were more likely to be younger, of First Nations status, be a “sweet-liker”, have a lower perceived intensity of sweetness, and a higher weekly consumption of full sugar soft drinks compared to the “full sugar soft drink disliker” group, where “sweet-dislikers” made up &gt; 80% of this cluster.</p>","PeriodicalId":17223,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sensory Studies","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joss.70008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sensory Studies","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joss.70008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is concern that high sugar-sweetened beverage consumption may reduce the intake of more nutritionally dense foods and lead to a higher risk of chronic diseases, particularly for vulnerable populations, including First Nations People. The current study investigates consumer acceptability of five carbonated beverages with a range of sugar contents (0%–11.5%) including novel low-sugar formulations with bush fruits and commercial soft drink comparators. The results from 142 consumers reveal the full sugar soft drink (11.5% sugar) had the highest acceptability, closely followed by the low sugar novel formulation (5.9% sugar). The consumer cluster “full sugar soft drink likers” were more likely to be younger, of First Nations status, be a “sweet-liker”, have a lower perceived intensity of sweetness, and a higher weekly consumption of full sugar soft drinks compared to the “full sugar soft drink disliker” group, where “sweet-dislikers” made up > 80% of this cluster.

Abstract Image

一项享乐感官试验:探索饮料系统中嗜甜者身份、人口统计学和健康可接受性之间的关系
令人关切的是,高糖含糖饮料的消费可能会减少更多营养密集食物的摄入,并导致患慢性病的风险更高,特别是对包括第一民族在内的弱势群体而言。目前的研究调查了消费者对五种碳酸饮料的接受程度,这些饮料的含糖量范围(0%-11.5%),包括用灌木水果和商业软饮料比较的新型低糖配方。142名消费者的调查结果显示,全糖软饮料(含糖11.5%)的可接受度最高,其次是低糖新配方(含糖5.9%)。与“不喜欢全糖软饮料”的消费者群体相比,“不喜欢甜食”的消费者群体更有可能是年轻人,具有原住民身份,是“甜食爱好者”,对甜味的感知强度较低,每周对全糖软饮料的消费量更高,而“不喜欢甜食”的消费者群体占该群体的80%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sensory Studies
Journal of Sensory Studies 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sensory Studies publishes original research and review articles, as well as expository and tutorial papers focusing on observational and experimental studies that lead to development and application of sensory and consumer (including behavior) methods to products such as food and beverage, medical, agricultural, biological, pharmaceutical, cosmetics, or other materials; information such as marketing and consumer information; or improvement of services based on sensory methods. All papers should show some advancement of sensory science in terms of methods. The journal does NOT publish papers that focus primarily on the application of standard sensory techniques to experimental variations in products unless the authors can show a unique application of sensory in an unusual way or in a new product category where sensory methods usually have not been applied.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信