Relationships among adult full, half, and stepsiblings: Does coresidence explain the stepgap?

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Suzanne de Leeuw, Maaike Hornstra, Matthijs Kalmijn
{"title":"Relationships among adult full, half, and stepsiblings: Does coresidence explain the stepgap?","authors":"Suzanne de Leeuw,&nbsp;Maaike Hornstra,&nbsp;Matthijs Kalmijn","doi":"10.1111/jomf.13027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This article aims to compare adult sibling ties of stepsiblings to the ties of full and half-siblings in divorced families, widowed families, and single-parent families.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Siblings are one of the most stable sources of attachment and companionship over the life course and function as important providers of practical and emotional support when going through important life transitions. Due to a steep rise in divorce over the past decades and accompanied increases in remarriage and multipartner fertility, many adults nowadays not only have full siblings, but also half-siblings and stepsiblings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Using a new module on adult sibling relationships and random- and fixed-effects modeling (OKiN, <i>N</i> = 4506 dyads nested in <i>N</i> = 1742 respondents), we examine the quality of full, half, and stepsibling ties in adulthood and test the main mechanisms driving a potential stepgap in sibling ties: (1) the (absence) of a shared genetic relatedness and (2) the amount of time shared in the same parental household.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The weaker bonds adults, on average, have with their stepsiblings compared to their biological (full and half) siblings are largely explained by the shorter period of time they have lived together during childhood. Nevertheless, a substantial gap remains.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our results confirm that a stepgap in sibling closeness, contact, and support is visible, but substantially reduced once shared time is considered.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marriage and Family","volume":"87 1","pages":"201-218"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jomf.13027","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marriage and Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.13027","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This article aims to compare adult sibling ties of stepsiblings to the ties of full and half-siblings in divorced families, widowed families, and single-parent families.

Background

Siblings are one of the most stable sources of attachment and companionship over the life course and function as important providers of practical and emotional support when going through important life transitions. Due to a steep rise in divorce over the past decades and accompanied increases in remarriage and multipartner fertility, many adults nowadays not only have full siblings, but also half-siblings and stepsiblings.

Method

Using a new module on adult sibling relationships and random- and fixed-effects modeling (OKiN, N = 4506 dyads nested in N = 1742 respondents), we examine the quality of full, half, and stepsibling ties in adulthood and test the main mechanisms driving a potential stepgap in sibling ties: (1) the (absence) of a shared genetic relatedness and (2) the amount of time shared in the same parental household.

Results

The weaker bonds adults, on average, have with their stepsiblings compared to their biological (full and half) siblings are largely explained by the shorter period of time they have lived together during childhood. Nevertheless, a substantial gap remains.

Conclusion

Our results confirm that a stepgap in sibling closeness, contact, and support is visible, but substantially reduced once shared time is considered.

Abstract Image

同父异母、同父异母和同父异母的兄弟姐妹之间的关系:同居能解释步差吗?
目的比较离异家庭、丧偶家庭和单亲家庭中继兄弟姐妹与同父异母兄弟姐妹的成年兄弟姐妹关系。兄弟姐妹是一生中最稳定的依恋和陪伴的来源之一,在经历重要的生活转变时,他们是重要的实际和情感支持的提供者。由于过去几十年来离婚率的急剧上升,以及再婚和多配偶生育率的增加,现在许多成年人不仅有同父异母的兄弟姐妹,还有同父异母的兄弟姐妹和继兄弟姐妹。方法使用一个新的成人兄弟姐妹关系模块和随机和固定效应模型(OKiN, N = 4506对嵌套在N = 1742名受访者中),我们检查了成年后全兄弟姐妹、半兄弟姐妹和继兄弟姐妹关系的质量,并测试了驱动兄弟姐妹关系潜在阶梯差距的主要机制。(1)缺乏共同的遗传亲缘关系;(2)在同一个父母家庭中共同生活的时间。结果:成年人与同父异母的兄弟姐妹之间的平均关系较弱,这在很大程度上是因为他们在童年时期共同生活的时间较短。然而,一个巨大的差距仍然存在。结论:我们的研究结果证实了兄弟姐妹亲密度、联系和支持方面的差距是明显的,但一旦考虑到共享时间,差距就会大大减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years, Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) has been a leading research journal in the family field. JMF features original research and theory, research interpretation and reviews, and critical discussion concerning all aspects of marriage, other forms of close relationships, and families.In 2009, an institutional subscription to Journal of Marriage and Family includes a subscription to Family Relations and Journal of Family Theory & Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信