Psychotherapeutic Treatment of Chronic Suicidality

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHIATRY
Mark J. Goldblatt, Alison C. Phillips, Elsa Ronningstam, Mark Schechter, Benjamin Herbstman
{"title":"Psychotherapeutic Treatment of Chronic Suicidality","authors":"Mark J. Goldblatt,&nbsp;Alison C. Phillips,&nbsp;Elsa Ronningstam,&nbsp;Mark Schechter,&nbsp;Benjamin Herbstman","doi":"10.1111/bjp.12935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>People who seriously consider killing themselves over a protracted period of time, usually years, represent great treatment challenges. Chronic suicidal ideation represents a communication of conscious and unconscious wishes that may be clarified through psychotherapy leading to various outcomes. For one group of patients, this focus will eventually change as they move gradually, over long periods of time, towards more life-affirming goals; a second group will continue to think intensely about suicide for many years, despite various psychotherapeutic interventions, without resorting to self-destructive action; and a third group will go on to attempt suicide which may or may not end in death. In this paper, we present two case studies describing the treatment of patients struggling with chronic suicidality who engaged in psychotherapy but with different outcomes. We discuss the possible outcomes and consider influential factors and suggestions for therapeutic interventions</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":54130,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Psychotherapy","volume":"41 1","pages":"123-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjp.12935","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People who seriously consider killing themselves over a protracted period of time, usually years, represent great treatment challenges. Chronic suicidal ideation represents a communication of conscious and unconscious wishes that may be clarified through psychotherapy leading to various outcomes. For one group of patients, this focus will eventually change as they move gradually, over long periods of time, towards more life-affirming goals; a second group will continue to think intensely about suicide for many years, despite various psychotherapeutic interventions, without resorting to self-destructive action; and a third group will go on to attempt suicide which may or may not end in death. In this paper, we present two case studies describing the treatment of patients struggling with chronic suicidality who engaged in psychotherapy but with different outcomes. We discuss the possible outcomes and consider influential factors and suggestions for therapeutic interventions.

慢性自杀的心理治疗
那些长期(通常是数年)认真考虑过自杀的人,对治疗构成了巨大挑战。慢性自杀意念代表了一种有意识和无意识愿望的交流,可以通过心理治疗来澄清,从而产生各种结果。对于一组患者来说,随着他们逐渐地,在很长一段时间内,朝着更肯定生活的目标前进,这种重点最终会改变;另一组人会持续多年强烈思考自杀问题,尽管有各种心理治疗干预,但他们不会采取自我毁灭的行动;第三组人会继续尝试自杀,可能以死亡告终,也可能不会。在本文中,我们提出了两个案例研究,描述了治疗慢性自杀患者谁从事心理治疗,但有不同的结果。我们讨论了可能的结果,并考虑了影响因素和治疗干预的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
50.00%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Psychotherapy is a journal for psychoanalytic and Jungian-analytic thinkers, with a focus on both innovatory and everyday work on the unconscious in individual, group and institutional practice. As an analytic journal, it has long occupied a unique place in the field of psychotherapy journals with an Editorial Board drawn from a wide range of psychoanalytic, psychoanalytic psychotherapy, psychodynamic, and analytical psychology training organizations. As such, its psychoanalytic frame of reference is wide-ranging and includes all schools of analytic practice. Conscious that many clinicians do not work only in the consulting room, the Journal encourages dialogue between private practice and institutionally based practice. Recognizing that structures and dynamics in each environment differ, the Journal provides a forum for an exploration of their differing potentials and constraints. Mindful of significant change in the wider contemporary context for psychotherapy, and within a changing regulatory framework, the Journal seeks to represent current debate about this context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信