{"title":"On not wanting to know: Some thoughts on Kazuo Ishiguro's novel Never Let Me Go","authors":"Christina Wieland","doi":"10.1111/bjp.12933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Kazuo Ishiguro's dystopian novel <i>Never Let Me Go</i> takes place, as the author tells us in ‘England, the late 1990s’ and follows the lives of a group of clones who had been created with the sole purpose of harvesting their organs for transplant. The novel is steeped in an atmosphere of illusion and self-deception while remaining deeply rooted in human emotions. I argue that to some extent it represents all of us, our illusions and self-deceptions. At another level, however, I argue that the novel is a sharp critique of a culture of narcissism and self-interest where human beings are treated as commodities, while creating the illusion that they are special and that ‘they never had it so good’, a saying from another time when self-deception was equally promoted. The paper concentrates on one aspect of this multilayered novel—the misrepresentation of reality and the human wish not to know about painful truths, but instead to create an illusory world. It examines this aspect of the novel in terms of the current neoliberal framework, and the culture of illusion that it promotes by ignoring the violence that underlies it. In particular, it examines how this pervasive aspect of contemporary culture affects the ability of the individual to ask questions and to pursue the truth, what Bion called ‘<i>K.</i>’</p>","PeriodicalId":54130,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Psychotherapy","volume":"41 1","pages":"106-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjp.12933","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Kazuo Ishiguro's dystopian novel Never Let Me Go takes place, as the author tells us in ‘England, the late 1990s’ and follows the lives of a group of clones who had been created with the sole purpose of harvesting their organs for transplant. The novel is steeped in an atmosphere of illusion and self-deception while remaining deeply rooted in human emotions. I argue that to some extent it represents all of us, our illusions and self-deceptions. At another level, however, I argue that the novel is a sharp critique of a culture of narcissism and self-interest where human beings are treated as commodities, while creating the illusion that they are special and that ‘they never had it so good’, a saying from another time when self-deception was equally promoted. The paper concentrates on one aspect of this multilayered novel—the misrepresentation of reality and the human wish not to know about painful truths, but instead to create an illusory world. It examines this aspect of the novel in terms of the current neoliberal framework, and the culture of illusion that it promotes by ignoring the violence that underlies it. In particular, it examines how this pervasive aspect of contemporary culture affects the ability of the individual to ask questions and to pursue the truth, what Bion called ‘K.’
石黑一雄(Kazuo Ishiguro)的反乌托邦小说《别让我走》(Never Let Me Go)发生在作者告诉我们的“20世纪90年代末的英国”,讲述了一群克隆人的生活。克隆人被创造出来的唯一目的是获取他们的器官用于移植。小说沉浸在幻觉和自我欺骗的氛围中,同时又深深植根于人类的情感。我认为在某种程度上它代表了我们所有人,我们的幻想和自我欺骗。然而,在另一个层面上,我认为这部小说是对自恋和自利文化的尖锐批判,在这种文化中,人类被视为商品,同时创造了一种错觉,认为他们是特别的,“他们从来没有这么好过”,这是另一个时代的说法,当时自我欺骗同样得到了推广。本文集中于这部多层小说的一个方面——对现实的歪曲和人类不希望知道痛苦的真相,而是创造一个虚幻的世界的愿望。它从当前的新自由主义框架和它通过忽视其背后的暴力而促进的幻觉文化的角度来审视小说的这一方面。特别是,它考察了当代文化中这种普遍存在的方面是如何影响个人提问和追求真理的能力的,比昂称之为“K”。
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Psychotherapy is a journal for psychoanalytic and Jungian-analytic thinkers, with a focus on both innovatory and everyday work on the unconscious in individual, group and institutional practice. As an analytic journal, it has long occupied a unique place in the field of psychotherapy journals with an Editorial Board drawn from a wide range of psychoanalytic, psychoanalytic psychotherapy, psychodynamic, and analytical psychology training organizations. As such, its psychoanalytic frame of reference is wide-ranging and includes all schools of analytic practice. Conscious that many clinicians do not work only in the consulting room, the Journal encourages dialogue between private practice and institutionally based practice. Recognizing that structures and dynamics in each environment differ, the Journal provides a forum for an exploration of their differing potentials and constraints. Mindful of significant change in the wider contemporary context for psychotherapy, and within a changing regulatory framework, the Journal seeks to represent current debate about this context.