Exploring Ambiguity in Social Prescribing: Creating a Typology of Models Based on a Scoping Review of Core Components and Conceptual Elements in Existing Programs

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Le-Tien Bhaskar, Gillian Mulvale, Vivien Underdown, Mike Des Jardins
{"title":"Exploring Ambiguity in Social Prescribing: Creating a Typology of Models Based on a Scoping Review of Core Components and Conceptual Elements in Existing Programs","authors":"Le-Tien Bhaskar,&nbsp;Gillian Mulvale,&nbsp;Vivien Underdown,&nbsp;Mike Des Jardins","doi":"10.1155/hsc/9390387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><b>Introduction:</b> Despite a growing social prescribing (SP) movement, the concept itself remains ambiguous, resulting in considerable variation in practice across different contexts. As discussions of SP emerge at the policy level, this ambiguity may influence program and policy spread. This research explores current literature and practices of SP to understand the different conceptual elements (i.e., goals and motivations) and core components (i.e., structures and behaviors) of SP.</p>\n <p><b>Methods:</b> A scoping review of academic literature was conducted. Search terms included “social prescr <sup>∗</sup>,” “social medicine,” “link worker,” “social refer <sup>∗</sup>,” and “community refer <sup>∗</sup>.” From this data, a typology of models based on descriptions of conceptual elements and core components was developed. Following the development of the typology, we applied our findings to existing SP programs, which were found through reference-checking academic sources and a community consultation conducted by our partner organization.</p>\n <p><b>Results:</b> 29 articles informed the scoping review, and 24 program descriptions were compared to the typology. Four models of SP are proposed. The clinical model follows a biomedical approach where the physician refers patients to SP services primarily geared to lifestyle factors. The holistic model addresses social determinants of health, referring to food security, housing, or income programs. The empowerment model considers well-being through relationship-building and a deep understanding of the client context. The healthy community’s model focuses on community development, where community members gain the capacity to better support one another.</p>\n <p><b>Conclusion:</b> The proposed typology will help implementers design programs that best suit their goals and contexts. At the policy level, this research demonstrates how a “bounded ambiguity” approach may allow SP to demonstrate its fullest potential. For researchers, this work provides a foundation for future exploration of how SP is implemented despite its ambiguity.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48195,"journal":{"name":"Health & Social Care in the Community","volume":"2025 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hsc/9390387","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health & Social Care in the Community","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hsc/9390387","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite a growing social prescribing (SP) movement, the concept itself remains ambiguous, resulting in considerable variation in practice across different contexts. As discussions of SP emerge at the policy level, this ambiguity may influence program and policy spread. This research explores current literature and practices of SP to understand the different conceptual elements (i.e., goals and motivations) and core components (i.e., structures and behaviors) of SP.

Methods: A scoping review of academic literature was conducted. Search terms included “social prescr ,” “social medicine,” “link worker,” “social refer ,” and “community refer .” From this data, a typology of models based on descriptions of conceptual elements and core components was developed. Following the development of the typology, we applied our findings to existing SP programs, which were found through reference-checking academic sources and a community consultation conducted by our partner organization.

Results: 29 articles informed the scoping review, and 24 program descriptions were compared to the typology. Four models of SP are proposed. The clinical model follows a biomedical approach where the physician refers patients to SP services primarily geared to lifestyle factors. The holistic model addresses social determinants of health, referring to food security, housing, or income programs. The empowerment model considers well-being through relationship-building and a deep understanding of the client context. The healthy community’s model focuses on community development, where community members gain the capacity to better support one another.

Conclusion: The proposed typology will help implementers design programs that best suit their goals and contexts. At the policy level, this research demonstrates how a “bounded ambiguity” approach may allow SP to demonstrate its fullest potential. For researchers, this work provides a foundation for future exploration of how SP is implemented despite its ambiguity.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
423
期刊介绍: Health and Social Care in the community is an essential journal for anyone involved in nursing, social work, physiotherapy, occupational therapy, general practice, health psychology, health economy, primary health care and the promotion of health. It is an international peer-reviewed journal supporting interdisciplinary collaboration on policy and practice within health and social care in the community. The journal publishes: - Original research papers in all areas of health and social care - Topical health and social care review articles - Policy and practice evaluations - Book reviews - Special issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信