Unveiling the Role of GPT-4 in Solving LeetCode Programming Problems

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Sarthak Vishnu,  Sahil, Naman Garg
{"title":"Unveiling the Role of GPT-4 in Solving LeetCode Programming Problems","authors":"Sarthak Vishnu,&nbsp; Sahil,&nbsp;Naman Garg","doi":"10.1002/cae.22815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The landscape of programming education is undergoing a transformative shift in the era of AI and machine learning. This research delves into the role of GPT-4, a state-of-the-art language model, in solving intermediate-level programming problems, focusing on the renowned LeetCode platform. For this, the work employs different programming problems from two LeetCode contests, providing a comprehensive evaluation of GPT-4's capabilities. The results reveal intriguing patterns in the model's behavior. Initial attempts, when provided with all inputs simultaneously, exhibit high accuracy, but subsequent attempts show consistent fluctuations, rarely surpassing the accuracy of the first attempt. Upon closer examination, a distinct pattern emerges in GPT-4's problem-solving approach, where the model iteratively refines its solutions, incorporating corrections in subsequent attempts. However, the lack of a historical context for past attempts raises questions about the model's attention span and its ability to rectify mistakes. Notably, GPT-4 consistently fails on the same test case with the same generated output, suggesting a potential limitation in addressing specific challenges. But, on leveraging human assistance to AI tools, the observations and patterns from the incorrect codes can be drawn and required adjustments to rectify the codes can be made. A direct result of this is observed in the increased success rate in problem-solving by students, rising from 68% in the moderate learning stage to 92% in the advanced learning stage. Hence, the presented work proposes a human-supervised methodology to leverage the AI-assisted code generation and employs that in improving the effectiveness of AI-assisted teaching–learning process.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50643,"journal":{"name":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Applications in Engineering Education","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cae.22815","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The landscape of programming education is undergoing a transformative shift in the era of AI and machine learning. This research delves into the role of GPT-4, a state-of-the-art language model, in solving intermediate-level programming problems, focusing on the renowned LeetCode platform. For this, the work employs different programming problems from two LeetCode contests, providing a comprehensive evaluation of GPT-4's capabilities. The results reveal intriguing patterns in the model's behavior. Initial attempts, when provided with all inputs simultaneously, exhibit high accuracy, but subsequent attempts show consistent fluctuations, rarely surpassing the accuracy of the first attempt. Upon closer examination, a distinct pattern emerges in GPT-4's problem-solving approach, where the model iteratively refines its solutions, incorporating corrections in subsequent attempts. However, the lack of a historical context for past attempts raises questions about the model's attention span and its ability to rectify mistakes. Notably, GPT-4 consistently fails on the same test case with the same generated output, suggesting a potential limitation in addressing specific challenges. But, on leveraging human assistance to AI tools, the observations and patterns from the incorrect codes can be drawn and required adjustments to rectify the codes can be made. A direct result of this is observed in the increased success rate in problem-solving by students, rising from 68% in the moderate learning stage to 92% in the advanced learning stage. Hence, the presented work proposes a human-supervised methodology to leverage the AI-assisted code generation and employs that in improving the effectiveness of AI-assisted teaching–learning process.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computer Applications in Engineering Education
Computer Applications in Engineering Education 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Computer Applications in Engineering Education provides a forum for publishing peer-reviewed timely information on the innovative uses of computers, Internet, and software tools in engineering education. Besides new courses and software tools, the CAE journal covers areas that support the integration of technology-based modules in the engineering curriculum and promotes discussion of the assessment and dissemination issues associated with these new implementation methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信