COVID-19 experiences and family resilience: A latent class analysis

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Xuejiao Chen, Wei-Jun Jean Yeung
{"title":"COVID-19 experiences and family resilience: A latent class analysis","authors":"Xuejiao Chen,&nbsp;Wei-Jun Jean Yeung","doi":"10.1111/jomf.13031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This study identifies subtypes of families with varying levels of economic and relational resilience during the pandemic and evaluates the factors associated with these subtypes in Singapore.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Despite mounting evidence on the detrimental impact of the pandemic on family well-being, we examine how resources at different levels may enhance family resilience.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>A sample of 2818 households was extracted from two waves of the Singapore Longitudinal Early Development Study (SG-LEADS). Latent class analysis was conducted to classify subgroups of families. Multinomial logistic regression was applied to examine the association between the subgroup membership and multilevel factors including mother's self-efficacy, family socioeconomic status, quality of family time, mother's work-life conflict, partner cooperation, neighborhood environment, and government and community support.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We identified six distinct groups of families: “economically and relationally fragile” (4%), “economically struggling but relationally improved” (11%), “economically struggling but relationally stable” (14%), “economically secure and relationally stable” (28%), “economically secure but relationally deteriorating” (11%) and “economically secure and relationally strengthened” (31%). Families with higher socioeconomic status tend to show economic resilience. Families with mothers exhibiting higher self-efficacy and lower work-life conflict, coupled with quality family time, better neighborhood, greater government and community support, are more relationally resilient.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The study provides a nuanced picture of family dynamics under a global crisis, highlighting the multilevel resources that are correlated with family resilience.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marriage and Family","volume":"87 1","pages":"280-299"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jomf.13031","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marriage and Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.13031","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study identifies subtypes of families with varying levels of economic and relational resilience during the pandemic and evaluates the factors associated with these subtypes in Singapore.

Background

Despite mounting evidence on the detrimental impact of the pandemic on family well-being, we examine how resources at different levels may enhance family resilience.

Method

A sample of 2818 households was extracted from two waves of the Singapore Longitudinal Early Development Study (SG-LEADS). Latent class analysis was conducted to classify subgroups of families. Multinomial logistic regression was applied to examine the association between the subgroup membership and multilevel factors including mother's self-efficacy, family socioeconomic status, quality of family time, mother's work-life conflict, partner cooperation, neighborhood environment, and government and community support.

Results

We identified six distinct groups of families: “economically and relationally fragile” (4%), “economically struggling but relationally improved” (11%), “economically struggling but relationally stable” (14%), “economically secure and relationally stable” (28%), “economically secure but relationally deteriorating” (11%) and “economically secure and relationally strengthened” (31%). Families with higher socioeconomic status tend to show economic resilience. Families with mothers exhibiting higher self-efficacy and lower work-life conflict, coupled with quality family time, better neighborhood, greater government and community support, are more relationally resilient.

Conclusion

The study provides a nuanced picture of family dynamics under a global crisis, highlighting the multilevel resources that are correlated with family resilience.

Abstract Image

COVID-19经历与家庭复原力:潜在类别分析
本研究确定了在大流行期间具有不同经济和关系弹性水平的家庭亚型,并评估了新加坡与这些亚型相关的因素。尽管越来越多的证据表明大流行对家庭福祉产生有害影响,但我们研究了不同层次的资源如何增强家庭复原力。方法从新加坡纵向早期发展研究(SG-LEADS)的两波调查中抽取2818个家庭样本。采用潜类分析对科的亚群进行分类。运用多项逻辑回归分析了子群体成员与母亲自我效能感、家庭社会经济地位、家庭时间质量、母亲工作生活冲突、伴侣合作、邻里环境、政府和社区支持等因素的关系。我们确定了六组不同的家庭:“经济和关系脆弱”(4%),“经济上挣扎但关系改善”(11%),“经济上挣扎但关系稳定”(14%),“经济上安全且关系稳定”(28%),“经济上安全但关系恶化”(11%)和“经济上安全且关系加强”(31%)。社会经济地位较高的家庭往往表现出经济弹性。母亲的家庭表现出更高的自我效能感和更低的工作与生活冲突,再加上高质量的家庭时间、更好的邻里关系、更多的政府和社区支持,他们的关系更有弹性。该研究提供了全球危机下家庭动态的细致图景,突出了与家庭弹性相关的多层次资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years, Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) has been a leading research journal in the family field. JMF features original research and theory, research interpretation and reviews, and critical discussion concerning all aspects of marriage, other forms of close relationships, and families.In 2009, an institutional subscription to Journal of Marriage and Family includes a subscription to Family Relations and Journal of Family Theory & Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信