Compatibility and interference of food simulants and organic solvents with the in vitro toxicological assessment of food contact materials

IF 3.2 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Athanasios Kourkopoulos, Dick T. H. M. Sijm, Janneke Geerken, Misha F. Vrolijk
{"title":"Compatibility and interference of food simulants and organic solvents with the in vitro toxicological assessment of food contact materials","authors":"Athanasios Kourkopoulos,&nbsp;Dick T. H. M. Sijm,&nbsp;Janneke Geerken,&nbsp;Misha F. Vrolijk","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.17659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ensuring the safety of food contact materials (FCMs) is paramount, governed by regulations such as Regulation (EC) 1935/2004 and Commission Regulation (European Union [EU]) 10/2011 for plastic FCMs. This study evaluates the compatibility of food simulants specified in the latter regulation with in vitro biological testing. HepG2 and Caco-2 cell lines were exposed to various concentrations of ethanol and acetic acid. Maximum tolerable amounts of food simulants A, C, and D1 (10%, 20%, and 50% v/v ethanol) were specified at 0.5%, 1.25%, and 2.5%. Food simulant E, Tenax, requires an additional extraction step for the recovery of migrants. An acetone–methanol mixture was selected for its ability to recover both polar and apolar potential migrants. The mixture exerted cytotoxic effects at combined concentrations above 0.5% v/v (0.25% each). Ethanol (Simulants A, C, and D1) interfered with the neutral red uptake (NRU) assay at concentrations above 0.5% v/v, showing no changes in cell viability despite increasing concentrations. Acetic acid (Simulant B) interfered with the NRU assay at 0.5% v/v and lactate dehydrogenase assay at all concentrations, resulting in negative cytotoxicity values due to pH reduction in the exposure medium. Additionally, sample preparation does not interfere with genotoxicity testing, aligning with the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA)’s mandatory testing requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"90 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1750-3841.17659","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.17659","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ensuring the safety of food contact materials (FCMs) is paramount, governed by regulations such as Regulation (EC) 1935/2004 and Commission Regulation (European Union [EU]) 10/2011 for plastic FCMs. This study evaluates the compatibility of food simulants specified in the latter regulation with in vitro biological testing. HepG2 and Caco-2 cell lines were exposed to various concentrations of ethanol and acetic acid. Maximum tolerable amounts of food simulants A, C, and D1 (10%, 20%, and 50% v/v ethanol) were specified at 0.5%, 1.25%, and 2.5%. Food simulant E, Tenax, requires an additional extraction step for the recovery of migrants. An acetone–methanol mixture was selected for its ability to recover both polar and apolar potential migrants. The mixture exerted cytotoxic effects at combined concentrations above 0.5% v/v (0.25% each). Ethanol (Simulants A, C, and D1) interfered with the neutral red uptake (NRU) assay at concentrations above 0.5% v/v, showing no changes in cell viability despite increasing concentrations. Acetic acid (Simulant B) interfered with the NRU assay at 0.5% v/v and lactate dehydrogenase assay at all concentrations, resulting in negative cytotoxicity values due to pH reduction in the exposure medium. Additionally, sample preparation does not interfere with genotoxicity testing, aligning with the European Food Safety Agency (EFSA)’s mandatory testing requirements.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Science
Journal of Food Science 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
412
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science. The range of topics covered in the journal include: -Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science -New Horizons in Food Research -Integrated Food Science -Food Chemistry -Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology -Food Microbiology and Safety -Sensory and Consumer Sciences -Health, Nutrition, and Food -Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信