Feature selections based on uncertainty measurements from dual-quantitative improvement and double-hierarchical fusion

IF 3.4 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Qian Wang, Xianyong Zhang, Zhiying Lv, Zhiwen Mo
{"title":"Feature selections based on uncertainty measurements from dual-quantitative improvement and double-hierarchical fusion","authors":"Qian Wang,&nbsp;Xianyong Zhang,&nbsp;Zhiying Lv,&nbsp;Zhiwen Mo","doi":"10.1007/s10489-024-06075-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Feature selections promote classification learning, and rough set theory offers effective mathematical methods; in practice, the performance enhancement of feature selection algorithms formulates a research target and challenge, and the corresponding problem solving usually resorts to improvement constructions of uncertainty measures. By fitting fuzzy rough sets (FFRSs), the relative dependency complement mutual information (FDCIE) motivates a recent algorithm of feature selection, called FNRDCI; however, FDCIE has improvement space of quantification view and fusion hierarchy, so the corresponding feature selection and heuristic algorithm can be advanced. In this paper, the dependency is improved by information localization, while the mutual information is enriched by information fuzzification and decision-class combination, so improved fusion measures and robuster feature selections are established by double-hierarchical fusion on decision classification and class. At first, the correctional dependency is proposed by fuzzy decision localization, and it induces a classification fusion measure (i.e. FCDCIE); based on two types of fuzzy decisions, two types of mutual information (i.e. FRCEmI and FRCFmI) are established by information fuzzification and class combination. Then, two types of dependency and two types of mutual information combinedly generate <span>\\(2\\times 2=4\\)</span> classification fusion measures (i.e. IFRDCEmI, IFRDCFmI, IFRCDCEmI, IFRCDCFmI) by pursuing class-level priority fusion; these new measures acquire semantics uncertainty, system equations, and granulation monotonicity/nonmonotonicity. Furthermore, <span>\\(1+2\\times 2=5\\)</span> fusion measures yield 5 novel feature selections with heuristic algorithms. Finally, experimental comparisons demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed novel methods of uncertainty measures and selection algorithms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8041,"journal":{"name":"Applied Intelligence","volume":"55 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10489-024-06075-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Feature selections promote classification learning, and rough set theory offers effective mathematical methods; in practice, the performance enhancement of feature selection algorithms formulates a research target and challenge, and the corresponding problem solving usually resorts to improvement constructions of uncertainty measures. By fitting fuzzy rough sets (FFRSs), the relative dependency complement mutual information (FDCIE) motivates a recent algorithm of feature selection, called FNRDCI; however, FDCIE has improvement space of quantification view and fusion hierarchy, so the corresponding feature selection and heuristic algorithm can be advanced. In this paper, the dependency is improved by information localization, while the mutual information is enriched by information fuzzification and decision-class combination, so improved fusion measures and robuster feature selections are established by double-hierarchical fusion on decision classification and class. At first, the correctional dependency is proposed by fuzzy decision localization, and it induces a classification fusion measure (i.e. FCDCIE); based on two types of fuzzy decisions, two types of mutual information (i.e. FRCEmI and FRCFmI) are established by information fuzzification and class combination. Then, two types of dependency and two types of mutual information combinedly generate \(2\times 2=4\) classification fusion measures (i.e. IFRDCEmI, IFRDCFmI, IFRCDCEmI, IFRCDCFmI) by pursuing class-level priority fusion; these new measures acquire semantics uncertainty, system equations, and granulation monotonicity/nonmonotonicity. Furthermore, \(1+2\times 2=5\) fusion measures yield 5 novel feature selections with heuristic algorithms. Finally, experimental comparisons demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of the proposed novel methods of uncertainty measures and selection algorithms.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Intelligence
Applied Intelligence 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
20.80%
发文量
1361
审稿时长
5.9 months
期刊介绍: With a focus on research in artificial intelligence and neural networks, this journal addresses issues involving solutions of real-life manufacturing, defense, management, government and industrial problems which are too complex to be solved through conventional approaches and require the simulation of intelligent thought processes, heuristics, applications of knowledge, and distributed and parallel processing. The integration of these multiple approaches in solving complex problems is of particular importance. The journal presents new and original research and technological developments, addressing real and complex issues applicable to difficult problems. It provides a medium for exchanging scientific research and technological achievements accomplished by the international community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信