Comprehensive Weight Decomposition Analysis of Modern Parameter-Efficient Methods

IF 1 Q4 OPTICS
A. V. Demidovskij, I. G. Salnikov, A. M. Tugaryov, A. I. Trutnev, I. A. Novikova
{"title":"Comprehensive Weight Decomposition Analysis of Modern Parameter-Efficient Methods","authors":"A. V. Demidovskij,&nbsp;I. G. Salnikov,&nbsp;A. M. Tugaryov,&nbsp;A. I. Trutnev,&nbsp;I. A. Novikova","doi":"10.3103/S1060992X24700796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Large Language Models fine-tuning is an essential part of modern artificial intelligent systems that solve numerous tasks, such as natural language processing and computer vision. Among the various fine-tuning strategies, the most prominent approach for Large Language Model fine-tuning is Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT), as it allows to achieve state-of-the-art performance on multiple tasks while minimizing computational resources and training time. Recently, an increasing number of PEFT methodologies have been developed, each asserting superiority based on performance metrics. However, a critical evaluation of how these methods align with the tuning dynamic of the full fine-tuning (FT) remains largely unexplored. This study focuses on bridging this gap by analyzing the learning behavior of such PEFT approaches as LoRA, LoRA+, AdaLoRA, DoRA, VeRA, PiSSA, LoKr and LoHa in comparison to FT. This work provides a comprehensive comparative analysis aimed at identifying which PEFT methods diverge significantly in weights update dynamic from the FT standard. The findings reveal insights into the underlying causes of these discrepancies, offering a deeper understanding of each method’s behavior and efficacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":721,"journal":{"name":"Optical Memory and Neural Networks","volume":"33 3 supplement","pages":"S513 - S522"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optical Memory and Neural Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3103/S1060992X24700796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large Language Models fine-tuning is an essential part of modern artificial intelligent systems that solve numerous tasks, such as natural language processing and computer vision. Among the various fine-tuning strategies, the most prominent approach for Large Language Model fine-tuning is Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT), as it allows to achieve state-of-the-art performance on multiple tasks while minimizing computational resources and training time. Recently, an increasing number of PEFT methodologies have been developed, each asserting superiority based on performance metrics. However, a critical evaluation of how these methods align with the tuning dynamic of the full fine-tuning (FT) remains largely unexplored. This study focuses on bridging this gap by analyzing the learning behavior of such PEFT approaches as LoRA, LoRA+, AdaLoRA, DoRA, VeRA, PiSSA, LoKr and LoHa in comparison to FT. This work provides a comprehensive comparative analysis aimed at identifying which PEFT methods diverge significantly in weights update dynamic from the FT standard. The findings reveal insights into the underlying causes of these discrepancies, offering a deeper understanding of each method’s behavior and efficacy.

Abstract Image

现代参数高效方法的综合权重分解分析
大型语言模型微调是现代人工智能系统的重要组成部分,它解决了许多任务,如自然语言处理和计算机视觉。在各种微调策略中,大型语言模型微调最突出的方法是参数高效微调(PEFT),因为它允许在多个任务上实现最先进的性能,同时最小化计算资源和训练时间。最近,越来越多的PEFT方法被开发出来,每一种方法都基于性能指标来断言其优越性。然而,对这些方法如何与完全微调(FT)的调谐动态对齐的关键评估在很大程度上仍未被探索。本研究的重点是通过分析与FT相比,LoRA、LoRA+、AdaLoRA、DoRA、VeRA、PiSSA、LoKr和LoHa等PEFT方法的学习行为来弥合这一差距。这项工作提供了一个全面的比较分析,旨在确定哪些PEFT方法在权重更新动态方面与FT标准存在显著差异。这些发现揭示了这些差异的潜在原因,对每种方法的行为和功效有了更深入的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The journal covers a wide range of issues in information optics such as optical memory, mechanisms for optical data recording and processing, photosensitive materials, optical, optoelectronic and holographic nanostructures, and many other related topics. Papers on memory systems using holographic and biological structures and concepts of brain operation are also included. The journal pays particular attention to research in the field of neural net systems that may lead to a new generation of computional technologies by endowing them with intelligence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信