Nonradial plant capacity concepts: proposals and attainability

IF 4.4 3区 管理学 Q1 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Kristiaan Kerstens, Jafar Sadeghi, Xiangyang Tao
{"title":"Nonradial plant capacity concepts: proposals and attainability","authors":"Kristiaan Kerstens,&nbsp;Jafar Sadeghi,&nbsp;Xiangyang Tao","doi":"10.1007/s10479-024-06423-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This contribution observes that plant capacity notions based on traditional radial efficiency measures may leave substantial amounts of slacks or unmeasured inefficiency. These unmeasured inefficiencies can result in inaccurate assessments of production capabilities, potentially leading to suboptimal operational and strategic decisions. To remedy this problem, we define new nonradial output-oriented and input-oriented plant capacity concepts based on nonradial Färe-Lovell efficiency measures. By leveraging nonradial measures, our approach captures multidimensional inefficiencies, providing a more nuanced and accurate evaluation of production performance across various input and output dimensions. Furthermore, we also explore how the introduction of nonradial attainability levels can render the attainable output-oriented plant capacity concept more flexible. This flexibility allows for the incorporation of realistic operational constraints, ensuring that capacity assessments are both practical and adaptable to diverse production environments. An empirical illustration on a secondary data set illustrates the pertinent differences between radial and nonradial plant capacity notions. Our empirical analysis demonstrates that nonradial measures offer a more detailed understanding of capacity utilization. In particular, it shows that nonradial plant capacity concepts are especially important on a nonconvex technology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8215,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Operations Research","volume":"345 1","pages":"169 - 205"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Operations Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10479-024-06423-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This contribution observes that plant capacity notions based on traditional radial efficiency measures may leave substantial amounts of slacks or unmeasured inefficiency. These unmeasured inefficiencies can result in inaccurate assessments of production capabilities, potentially leading to suboptimal operational and strategic decisions. To remedy this problem, we define new nonradial output-oriented and input-oriented plant capacity concepts based on nonradial Färe-Lovell efficiency measures. By leveraging nonradial measures, our approach captures multidimensional inefficiencies, providing a more nuanced and accurate evaluation of production performance across various input and output dimensions. Furthermore, we also explore how the introduction of nonradial attainability levels can render the attainable output-oriented plant capacity concept more flexible. This flexibility allows for the incorporation of realistic operational constraints, ensuring that capacity assessments are both practical and adaptable to diverse production environments. An empirical illustration on a secondary data set illustrates the pertinent differences between radial and nonradial plant capacity notions. Our empirical analysis demonstrates that nonradial measures offer a more detailed understanding of capacity utilization. In particular, it shows that nonradial plant capacity concepts are especially important on a nonconvex technology.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Operations Research
Annals of Operations Research 管理科学-运筹学与管理科学
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
596
审稿时长
8.4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Operations Research publishes peer-reviewed original articles dealing with key aspects of operations research, including theory, practice, and computation. The journal publishes full-length research articles, short notes, expositions and surveys, reports on computational studies, and case studies that present new and innovative practical applications. In addition to regular issues, the journal publishes periodic special volumes that focus on defined fields of operations research, ranging from the highly theoretical to the algorithmic and the applied. These volumes have one or more Guest Editors who are responsible for collecting the papers and overseeing the refereeing process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信