Shuai Yan, Yuting Wang, Guangyao Chen, Wanli Ma, Yingquan Chen, Xianhua Wang, Kuo Zeng, Yonggang Yao, Hongqi Sun, Haiping Yang and Hanping Chen
{"title":"Transition metal-promoted Fe-based catalysts for photothermal catalytic CO2 hydrogenation†","authors":"Shuai Yan, Yuting Wang, Guangyao Chen, Wanli Ma, Yingquan Chen, Xianhua Wang, Kuo Zeng, Yonggang Yao, Hongqi Sun, Haiping Yang and Hanping Chen","doi":"10.1039/D4CY01271B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Transition metal doping for Fe-based catalysts has been demonstrated in promoting the activity and regulating the selectivity in both the reverse water gas shift reaction and Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. However, there are few studies that concern their catalytic performance tailored by transition metal promoters under photothermal conditions. In this study, a series of typical MFeO<small><sub><em>x</em></sub></small> (M = Mn, Co, Cu, Zn) catalysts were synthesized with a facile co-precipitation method and their photothermal CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> hydrogenation properties were evaluated. The results showed that the doping of Co, Cu, and Zn enhanced the activity and regulated the selectivity of Fe-based catalysts, <em>e.g.</em>, CoFe achieving a C<small><sub>2+</sub></small> yield of 1.73 mmol h<small><sup>−1</sup></small> g<small><sup>−1</sup></small> while ZnFe almost doubling the CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> conversion under irradiation. Mechanistic studies suggest that Co and Cu facilitated the reduction of Fe species, resulting in favorable CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> and H<small><sub>2</sub></small> activation. Lastly, a light-induced direct CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> dissociation pathway was proposed with <em>in situ</em> EPR and DRIFTS characterization and analysis of the undoped Fe and ZnFe catalysts. This study provides a novel perspective on transition metal promoters for photothermal CO<small><sub>2</sub></small> hydrogenation over Fe-based catalysts.</p>","PeriodicalId":66,"journal":{"name":"Catalysis Science & Technology","volume":" 3","pages":" 856-866"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catalysis Science & Technology","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/cy/d4cy01271b","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Transition metal doping for Fe-based catalysts has been demonstrated in promoting the activity and regulating the selectivity in both the reverse water gas shift reaction and Fischer–Tropsch synthesis. However, there are few studies that concern their catalytic performance tailored by transition metal promoters under photothermal conditions. In this study, a series of typical MFeOx (M = Mn, Co, Cu, Zn) catalysts were synthesized with a facile co-precipitation method and their photothermal CO2 hydrogenation properties were evaluated. The results showed that the doping of Co, Cu, and Zn enhanced the activity and regulated the selectivity of Fe-based catalysts, e.g., CoFe achieving a C2+ yield of 1.73 mmol h−1 g−1 while ZnFe almost doubling the CO2 conversion under irradiation. Mechanistic studies suggest that Co and Cu facilitated the reduction of Fe species, resulting in favorable CO2 and H2 activation. Lastly, a light-induced direct CO2 dissociation pathway was proposed with in situ EPR and DRIFTS characterization and analysis of the undoped Fe and ZnFe catalysts. This study provides a novel perspective on transition metal promoters for photothermal CO2 hydrogenation over Fe-based catalysts.
期刊介绍:
A multidisciplinary journal focusing on cutting edge research across all fundamental science and technological aspects of catalysis.
Editor-in-chief: Bert Weckhuysen
Impact factor: 5.0
Time to first decision (peer reviewed only): 31 days