Consensus-Based Resilience Assurance for System of Systems

IF 3.4 3区计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS

IEEE Access Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3535519

Huanjun Zhang;Yutaka Matsubara

{"title":"Consensus-Based Resilience Assurance for System of Systems","authors":"Huanjun Zhang;Yutaka Matsubara","doi":"10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3535519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The complexity of a System of Systems makes resilience one of its key attributes. Numerous studies have focused on the quantitative assessment of resilience by trailing indicators, yet discussions on resilience assurance through monitoring leading indicators remain scarce. Resilience assurance in SoS faces two major challenges: lack of structured argumentation work related to resilience and conflicts among multiple independent stakeholders. To address these challenges, this paper first introduces a resilience argumentation approach based on STAMP (Systems-Theoretic Accident Model and Processes), then employs cooperative consensus process model to seek consensus on resilience assurance. Additionally, under the requirements of the international standard IEC 62853 for open systems dependability, a consensus based resilience assurance framework is proposed. Within the framework, the resilient team can discuss the specific implementation details of failure response, accountability, and change accommodation based on stakeholder consensus. Finally, two SoS case studies, Microgrid and Mobility as a Service, are used to demonstrate the application of the proposed approach.","PeriodicalId":13079,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Access","volume":"13 ","pages":"20203-20217"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10855432","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Access","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10855432/","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The complexity of a System of Systems makes resilience one of its key attributes. Numerous studies have focused on the quantitative assessment of resilience by trailing indicators, yet discussions on resilience assurance through monitoring leading indicators remain scarce. Resilience assurance in SoS faces two major challenges: lack of structured argumentation work related to resilience and conflicts among multiple independent stakeholders. To address these challenges, this paper first introduces a resilience argumentation approach based on STAMP (Systems-Theoretic Accident Model and Processes), then employs cooperative consensus process model to seek consensus on resilience assurance. Additionally, under the requirements of the international standard IEC 62853 for open systems dependability, a consensus based resilience assurance framework is proposed. Within the framework, the resilient team can discuss the specific implementation details of failure response, accountability, and change accommodation based on stakeholder consensus. Finally, two SoS case studies, Microgrid and Mobility as a Service, are used to demonstrate the application of the proposed approach.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

IEEE Access COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMSENGIN-ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC

CiteScore

9.80

自引率

7.70%

发文量

6673

审稿时长

6 weeks

期刊介绍： IEEE Access® is a multidisciplinary, open access (OA), applications-oriented, all-electronic archival journal that continuously presents the results of original research or development across all of IEEE''s fields of interest. IEEE Access will publish articles that are of high interest to readers, original, technically correct, and clearly presented. Supported by author publication charges (APC), its hallmarks are a rapid peer review and publication process with open access to all readers. Unlike IEEE''s traditional Transactions or Journals, reviews are "binary", in that reviewers will either Accept or Reject an article in the form it is submitted in order to achieve rapid turnaround. Especially encouraged are submissions on: Multidisciplinary topics, or applications-oriented articles and negative results that do not fit within the scope of IEEE''s traditional journals. Practical articles discussing new experiments or measurement techniques, interesting solutions to engineering. Development of new or improved fabrication or manufacturing techniques. Reviews or survey articles of new or evolving fields oriented to assist others in understanding the new area.