Stop plan optimisation for three-pattern skip-stop schemes for urban rail transit systems

IF 2.1 Q2 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Somporn Sahachaiseree , Mohammad Sadrani , Constantinos Antoniou
{"title":"Stop plan optimisation for three-pattern skip-stop schemes for urban rail transit systems","authors":"Somporn Sahachaiseree ,&nbsp;Mohammad Sadrani ,&nbsp;Constantinos Antoniou","doi":"10.1016/j.ejtl.2024.100149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Mass rapid transit systems around the world are typically designed for all-stop operation schemes, in which train overtaking is not possible. To accelerate transit operation, the conventional A/B skip-stop scheme may be planned. This research explores alternative skip-stop schemes with three stop patterns, aiming to better match transit services with the spatial distribution of travel demand. The proposed generalised skip-stop operation model considers both the total cost of passengers and operator. A genetic algorithm is employed to solve the stop-plan optimisation problem, and a heuristic is tailored to determine an optimal dispatch headway for the respective stop plan. Based on computational experiments using synthetic data, the results suggest that skip-stop schemes have the potential to reduce total time costs by about 10%, particularly when there are structured demand concentrations, transit systems can operate safely with low time headway and short-distance demand is low. Although the total-cost saving of the best A/B skip-stop plan found is generally superior to those of other three-pattern skip-stop schemes, a three-pattern skip-stop scheme was found to offer a better total-cost saving in a scenario without short-distance travel demands. Overall, this research offers valuable insights into the potential benefits and limitations of different skip-stop schemes, contributing to a better understanding of their impact on passengers and operators.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":45871,"journal":{"name":"EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2192437624000244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mass rapid transit systems around the world are typically designed for all-stop operation schemes, in which train overtaking is not possible. To accelerate transit operation, the conventional A/B skip-stop scheme may be planned. This research explores alternative skip-stop schemes with three stop patterns, aiming to better match transit services with the spatial distribution of travel demand. The proposed generalised skip-stop operation model considers both the total cost of passengers and operator. A genetic algorithm is employed to solve the stop-plan optimisation problem, and a heuristic is tailored to determine an optimal dispatch headway for the respective stop plan. Based on computational experiments using synthetic data, the results suggest that skip-stop schemes have the potential to reduce total time costs by about 10%, particularly when there are structured demand concentrations, transit systems can operate safely with low time headway and short-distance demand is low. Although the total-cost saving of the best A/B skip-stop plan found is generally superior to those of other three-pattern skip-stop schemes, a three-pattern skip-stop scheme was found to offer a better total-cost saving in a scenario without short-distance travel demands. Overall, this research offers valuable insights into the potential benefits and limitations of different skip-stop schemes, contributing to a better understanding of their impact on passengers and operators.
城市轨道交通三种模式跳停方案的停站方案优化
世界各地的快速轨道交通系统通常都是为全站运行方案设计的,在这种情况下,列车超车是不可能的。为加快公交运行,可规划传统的A/B跳停方案。本研究探讨了三种停车模式的跨站方案,旨在更好地匹配交通服务与出行需求的空间分布。所提出的广义跳站运营模型考虑了乘客和运营商的总成本。采用遗传算法求解停车计划优化问题,并采用启发式算法确定各停车计划的最优调度车头。基于合成数据的计算实验结果表明,跳停方案有可能将总时间成本降低约10%,特别是当存在结构化需求集中时,交通系统可以在低时距和短途需求低的情况下安全运行。虽然所发现的最佳A/B跳停方案的总成本节约总体上优于其他三种模式的跳停方案,但在没有短途出行需求的情况下,发现三种模式的跳停方案能提供更好的总成本节约。总的来说,这项研究对不同的跳过站方案的潜在好处和局限性提供了有价值的见解,有助于更好地了解它们对乘客和运营商的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
129 days
期刊介绍: The EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics promotes the use of mathematics in general, and operations research in particular, in the context of transportation and logistics. It is a forum for the presentation of original mathematical models, methodologies and computational results, focussing on advanced applications in transportation and logistics. The journal publishes two types of document: (i) research articles and (ii) tutorials. A research article presents original methodological contributions to the field (e.g. new mathematical models, new algorithms, new simulation techniques). A tutorial provides an introduction to an advanced topic, designed to ease the use of the relevant methodology by researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信