Usability and accessibility in mHealth stroke apps: An empirical assessment

Q1 Medicine
Pontus Svensson , Shuanglan Lin , Leonardo Horn Iwaya
{"title":"Usability and accessibility in mHealth stroke apps: An empirical assessment","authors":"Pontus Svensson ,&nbsp;Shuanglan Lin ,&nbsp;Leonardo Horn Iwaya","doi":"10.1016/j.imu.2025.101616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Cerebrovascular accidents or strokes continue to be among the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. This has stressed the need to design digital health solutions that can be effectively used by patients, caregivers, and medical professionals, helping to alleviate the global disease burden. In this context, mobile health (mHealth) apps are shown to be valuable solutions for bridging healthcare gaps.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>In this study, we aim to evaluate the quality aspects of usability and accessibility of stroke-related mHealth apps for Android. We seek to identify prevalent issues and discuss recommendations to enhance user experience and app quality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We selected 16 mHealth stroke apps, accounting for more than 219k downloads. The apps were assessed through different methods, including accessibility testing with the Google Accessibility Scanner, overall quality assessment with the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS), and usability testing using heuristic evaluations.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our findings show significant issues with the apps’ touch target sizes and text contrast, which are particularly important for stroke app users with impaired vision and motor skills. MARS evaluations revealed that some apps, such as the Constant Therapy app, excelled in engagement and functionality. In contrast, many apps scored lower due to limited functionality and unclear/confusing interfaces, such as Stroke Recovery Predictor and Conversation Therapy Lite. Heuristic evaluations also highlighted several usability violations, such as a lack of “Visibility of System Status” and “Insufficient Error Messaging.”</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Overall, most apps presented deficiencies in several aspects of usability and accessibility. As recommendations, developers can increase touch target sizes, improve text contrast, increase functional variety, optimise navigation, and enhance user engagement strategies. Addressing such issues can help improve the stroke apps’ usability and accessibility, aiming for better health outcomes for stroke patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13953,"journal":{"name":"Informatics in Medicine Unlocked","volume":"53 ","pages":"Article 101616"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics in Medicine Unlocked","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352914825000048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Cerebrovascular accidents or strokes continue to be among the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. This has stressed the need to design digital health solutions that can be effectively used by patients, caregivers, and medical professionals, helping to alleviate the global disease burden. In this context, mobile health (mHealth) apps are shown to be valuable solutions for bridging healthcare gaps.

Objective

In this study, we aim to evaluate the quality aspects of usability and accessibility of stroke-related mHealth apps for Android. We seek to identify prevalent issues and discuss recommendations to enhance user experience and app quality.

Methods

We selected 16 mHealth stroke apps, accounting for more than 219k downloads. The apps were assessed through different methods, including accessibility testing with the Google Accessibility Scanner, overall quality assessment with the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS), and usability testing using heuristic evaluations.

Results

Our findings show significant issues with the apps’ touch target sizes and text contrast, which are particularly important for stroke app users with impaired vision and motor skills. MARS evaluations revealed that some apps, such as the Constant Therapy app, excelled in engagement and functionality. In contrast, many apps scored lower due to limited functionality and unclear/confusing interfaces, such as Stroke Recovery Predictor and Conversation Therapy Lite. Heuristic evaluations also highlighted several usability violations, such as a lack of “Visibility of System Status” and “Insufficient Error Messaging.”

Conclusion

Overall, most apps presented deficiencies in several aspects of usability and accessibility. As recommendations, developers can increase touch target sizes, improve text contrast, increase functional variety, optimise navigation, and enhance user engagement strategies. Addressing such issues can help improve the stroke apps’ usability and accessibility, aiming for better health outcomes for stroke patients.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
282
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Informatics in Medicine Unlocked (IMU) is an international gold open access journal covering a broad spectrum of topics within medical informatics, including (but not limited to) papers focusing on imaging, pathology, teledermatology, public health, ophthalmological, nursing and translational medicine informatics. The full papers that are published in the journal are accessible to all who visit the website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信