Applying lexical sophistication models to wordlist development: A proof-of-concept study

Christopher Nicklin , Daniel Bailey , Stuart McLean , Young Ae Kim , Hyeonah Kang , Joseph P. Vitta
{"title":"Applying lexical sophistication models to wordlist development: A proof-of-concept study","authors":"Christopher Nicklin ,&nbsp;Daniel Bailey ,&nbsp;Stuart McLean ,&nbsp;Young Ae Kim ,&nbsp;Hyeonah Kang ,&nbsp;Joseph P. Vitta","doi":"10.1016/j.rmal.2024.100175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Language teaching stakeholders generally rely on frequency-derived wordlists to determine words for pedagogical purposes. However, words that are instinctively easier for many learners, such as “pizza”, occur less frequently in reference corpora than words that might be considered more difficult, such as “physics”. Furthermore, research demonstrates that modeling frequency alongside other lexical sophistication variables predicts word difficulty better than frequency alone. This study constitutes a proof-of-concept; the concept being that a lexical sophistication-based approach to wordlist construction can produce lists that outperform frequency as word difficulty predictors. The method resulted in lexical sophistication-derived difficulty scores for 14,054 of the 20,000 most frequent Corpus of Contemporary American English lemmas. When compared with other commonly used wordlists, these scores successfully addressed the “pizza/physics” problem in that “pizza” was ranked easier than “physics”, and they also displayed larger correlations with word difficulty than other lists across two linguistic domains. More importantly, the scores also performed comparably to a knowledge-based vocabulary list, but contained almost three times as many lemmas for a fraction of the time and financial costs. We envisage that the present study's methodology can be used by researchers and language teaching stakeholders to create bespoke wordlists for a range of contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101075,"journal":{"name":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772766124000818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Language teaching stakeholders generally rely on frequency-derived wordlists to determine words for pedagogical purposes. However, words that are instinctively easier for many learners, such as “pizza”, occur less frequently in reference corpora than words that might be considered more difficult, such as “physics”. Furthermore, research demonstrates that modeling frequency alongside other lexical sophistication variables predicts word difficulty better than frequency alone. This study constitutes a proof-of-concept; the concept being that a lexical sophistication-based approach to wordlist construction can produce lists that outperform frequency as word difficulty predictors. The method resulted in lexical sophistication-derived difficulty scores for 14,054 of the 20,000 most frequent Corpus of Contemporary American English lemmas. When compared with other commonly used wordlists, these scores successfully addressed the “pizza/physics” problem in that “pizza” was ranked easier than “physics”, and they also displayed larger correlations with word difficulty than other lists across two linguistic domains. More importantly, the scores also performed comparably to a knowledge-based vocabulary list, but contained almost three times as many lemmas for a fraction of the time and financial costs. We envisage that the present study's methodology can be used by researchers and language teaching stakeholders to create bespoke wordlists for a range of contexts.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信