Comparison of Outcomes Between African American and European American Patients With Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Jasmeet Kaur , Jill S. Hasler , Elizabeth A. Handorf , Matthew R. Zibelman , Fern Anari , Daniel M. Geynisman , Pooja Ghatalia
{"title":"Comparison of Outcomes Between African American and European American Patients With Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors","authors":"Jasmeet Kaur ,&nbsp;Jill S. Hasler ,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. Handorf ,&nbsp;Matthew R. Zibelman ,&nbsp;Fern Anari ,&nbsp;Daniel M. Geynisman ,&nbsp;Pooja Ghatalia","doi":"10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Objective</h3><div>Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and ICI/tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) (ICI-based) combinations are standard first-line treatment (tx) options for patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, only 1% of patients enrolled in trials studying these agents were Blacks.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with mRCC who received front-line ICI-based tx or sunitinib after 2011 were included from the Flatiron Health electronic record-derived database. We analyzed progression-free survival in African American (Black) and European American (White) patients and tested the interaction between treatment type and race. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess associations with outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Key Findings and Limitations</h3><div>Of 2,592 eligible pts, 2,379 (91.8%) were White, and 213 (8.2%) were Black. Of these, 1453 (56%) received ICI-based tx and 1139 (44%) received sunitinib. IMDC favorable, intermediate/poor and unknown risk was noted among 6%, 77.5% and 16.4% of White patients and 3.3%, 86.8% and 9.9% of Black patients. Median age was 64 years. There was no significant difference in PFS between Black and White patients receiving ICI-based treatment compared to sunitinib [hazard ratio (HR) for interaction between treatment type and race was 1.063 (0.78-1.45, <em>P</em> = .7)]. The interaction term between race and treatment type showed that there was no evidence of a differential treatment effect by race in the first 10 months (HR = 0.931 (0.79-1.10); <em>P</em> = .40), however significantly improved after 10 months (HR = 0.697 (0.56-0.87); <em>P</em> = .001). The retrospective nature of the study is a limitation</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and Clinical Implications</h3><div>The study found no significant difference in treatment effects between White and Black patients receiving ICI-based first-line treatment and should be the standard of care for both Black and White patients.</div></div><div><h3>Patient Summary</h3><div>We reviewed Flatiron databases of patients with mRCC from both Black and White populations, finding that ICI-based therapy should be considered the standard of care for patients from both racial backgrounds.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10380,"journal":{"name":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","volume":"23 2","pages":"Article 102304"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical genitourinary cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1558767325000060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objective

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and ICI/tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) (ICI-based) combinations are standard first-line treatment (tx) options for patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, only 1% of patients enrolled in trials studying these agents were Blacks.

Methods

Patients with mRCC who received front-line ICI-based tx or sunitinib after 2011 were included from the Flatiron Health electronic record-derived database. We analyzed progression-free survival in African American (Black) and European American (White) patients and tested the interaction between treatment type and race. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess associations with outcomes.

Key Findings and Limitations

Of 2,592 eligible pts, 2,379 (91.8%) were White, and 213 (8.2%) were Black. Of these, 1453 (56%) received ICI-based tx and 1139 (44%) received sunitinib. IMDC favorable, intermediate/poor and unknown risk was noted among 6%, 77.5% and 16.4% of White patients and 3.3%, 86.8% and 9.9% of Black patients. Median age was 64 years. There was no significant difference in PFS between Black and White patients receiving ICI-based treatment compared to sunitinib [hazard ratio (HR) for interaction between treatment type and race was 1.063 (0.78-1.45, P = .7)]. The interaction term between race and treatment type showed that there was no evidence of a differential treatment effect by race in the first 10 months (HR = 0.931 (0.79-1.10); P = .40), however significantly improved after 10 months (HR = 0.697 (0.56-0.87); P = .001). The retrospective nature of the study is a limitation

Conclusions and Clinical Implications

The study found no significant difference in treatment effects between White and Black patients receiving ICI-based first-line treatment and should be the standard of care for both Black and White patients.

Patient Summary

We reviewed Flatiron databases of patients with mRCC from both Black and White populations, finding that ICI-based therapy should be considered the standard of care for patients from both racial backgrounds.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical genitourinary cancer
Clinical genitourinary cancer 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
201
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Genitourinary Cancer is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original articles describing various aspects of clinical and translational research in genitourinary cancers. Clinical Genitourinary Cancer is devoted to articles on detection, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of genitourinary cancers. The main emphasis is on recent scientific developments in all areas related to genitourinary malignancies. Specific areas of interest include clinical research and mechanistic approaches; drug sensitivity and resistance; gene and antisense therapy; pathology, markers, and prognostic indicators; chemoprevention strategies; multimodality therapy; and integration of various approaches.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信