Procedural pain management in an academic emergency department, a pilot study

Irvan J. Bubic , Sidra L. Speaker , Christopher J. Coyne , Jessica C. Oswald
{"title":"Procedural pain management in an academic emergency department, a pilot study","authors":"Irvan J. Bubic ,&nbsp;Sidra L. Speaker ,&nbsp;Christopher J. Coyne ,&nbsp;Jessica C. Oswald","doi":"10.1016/j.jemrpt.2024.100134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Pain is the leading cause of Emergency Department (ED) visits and untreated acute pain can frequently transition to chronic pain. (1,2) A 2020 pilot study showed that an ED-physician-led procedural pain management program reduced pain. (3)</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Our objective was to determine the feasibility and usefulness of a Mobile ED (MED) Pain Management program led by a dual-trained Pain Management and Emergency physician.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We included adult patients who visited the ED at a large academic hospital between October 26th and November 17th, 2020. Patients had a variety of types of pain and were treated with bedside nerve blocks. We recorded procedure indication, demographic data, and pre-and-post Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores. We also captured patient and provider satisfaction, and billing data.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The MED team was available for a total of 30 h and performed 14 procedures on 12 patients and 4 consults without procedures on 4 additional patients. VAS 30-min score reductions ranged from 20 % (intercostal nerve blocks) to 100 % erector spinae plane block (ESPB). The average VAS pain reduction was 58 %. The most common procedure performed was the ESPB with mean VAS pain reduction of 74 %. The procedures and consults produced 50.13 RVUs total and work Relative Value Units (wRVUs) of 29.4. Average RVU was 3.13 (1.84 wRVU) per patient and 1.67 RVU (0.98 wRVU) per hour.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These preliminary data suggest that although implementation of a dedicated ED pain could potentially lead to improved pain relief, it may not be financially feasible in this setting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73546,"journal":{"name":"JEM reports","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100134"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JEM reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773232024000646","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pain is the leading cause of Emergency Department (ED) visits and untreated acute pain can frequently transition to chronic pain. (1,2) A 2020 pilot study showed that an ED-physician-led procedural pain management program reduced pain. (3)

Objectives

Our objective was to determine the feasibility and usefulness of a Mobile ED (MED) Pain Management program led by a dual-trained Pain Management and Emergency physician.

Methods

We included adult patients who visited the ED at a large academic hospital between October 26th and November 17th, 2020. Patients had a variety of types of pain and were treated with bedside nerve blocks. We recorded procedure indication, demographic data, and pre-and-post Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores. We also captured patient and provider satisfaction, and billing data.

Results

The MED team was available for a total of 30 h and performed 14 procedures on 12 patients and 4 consults without procedures on 4 additional patients. VAS 30-min score reductions ranged from 20 % (intercostal nerve blocks) to 100 % erector spinae plane block (ESPB). The average VAS pain reduction was 58 %. The most common procedure performed was the ESPB with mean VAS pain reduction of 74 %. The procedures and consults produced 50.13 RVUs total and work Relative Value Units (wRVUs) of 29.4. Average RVU was 3.13 (1.84 wRVU) per patient and 1.67 RVU (0.98 wRVU) per hour.

Conclusions

These preliminary data suggest that although implementation of a dedicated ED pain could potentially lead to improved pain relief, it may not be financially feasible in this setting.
一个学术急诊科的程序性疼痛管理,一项试点研究
背景:疼痛是急诊科(ED)就诊的主要原因,未经治疗的急性疼痛经常会转变为慢性疼痛。(1,2) 2020年的一项试点研究表明,ed医生主导的程序性疼痛管理计划可以减少疼痛。(3)目的我们的目的是确定由受过双重训练的疼痛管理和急诊医生领导的移动ED (MED)疼痛管理项目的可行性和有效性。方法纳入2020年10月26日至11月17日在某大型学术医院急诊科就诊的成年患者。患者有各种类型的疼痛,采用床边神经阻滞治疗。我们记录手术指征、人口统计数据和视觉模拟评分(VAS)前后疼痛评分。我们还捕获了患者和提供者满意度以及账单数据。结果MED团队共工作30 h,对12例患者进行了14次手术,对另外4例患者进行了4次无手术会诊。VAS 30分钟评分降低范围从20%(肋间神经阻滞)到100%竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)。VAS疼痛平均减轻58%。最常见的手术是ESPB,平均VAS疼痛减轻74%。程序和咨询共产生50.13 rvu,工作相对价值单位(wrvu)为29.4。平均RVU为3.13 (1.84 wRVU) /例,1.67 RVU (0.98 wRVU) /小时。这些初步数据表明,尽管实施专门的ED疼痛可能会改善疼痛缓解,但在这种情况下,它可能在经济上不可行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JEM reports
JEM reports Emergency Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
54 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信