Ketamine for rapid control of hyperactive delirium with severe agitation. A retrospective comparison study

Beatrice Borreani , Annalisa Belluti , Francescopaolo D'Adamo , Luca Acquarone , Cristina Cocino , Paolo Canepa , Francesco Quaglia , Martina D'Antoni , Andrea Alienda , Alessandro Riccardi
{"title":"Ketamine for rapid control of hyperactive delirium with severe agitation. A retrospective comparison study","authors":"Beatrice Borreani ,&nbsp;Annalisa Belluti ,&nbsp;Francescopaolo D'Adamo ,&nbsp;Luca Acquarone ,&nbsp;Cristina Cocino ,&nbsp;Paolo Canepa ,&nbsp;Francesco Quaglia ,&nbsp;Martina D'Antoni ,&nbsp;Andrea Alienda ,&nbsp;Alessandro Riccardi","doi":"10.1016/j.jemrpt.2025.100138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The agitated patient represents a very large clinical problem for the work of the emergency department. The therapeutic goal is rapid symptom control while ensuring maximum patient safety. Hyperactive delirium constitutes a true clinical emergency, and some sedatives carry inherent risks. Ketamine has already demonstrated remarkable safety in this setting. OBJECTIVES This study aims to indentify an effective and safe option for the rapid control of severe psychomotor agitation METHODS Our retrospective study analyzes the comparison of ketamine alone, ketamine with droperidol, and midazolam with haloperidol. RESULTS During the period of January 2022 and September 2023 we identified 66 patients with severe psychomotor agitation (13–76 years), and we demonstrated a faster and more effective response in patients treated with ketamine, and a reduction in adverse events in patients treated with ketamine and droperidol. CONCLUSIONS Our data show that patients treated with ketamine exhibit a significantly faster response, with immediate patient control, with greater safety than patients treated with midazolam. The combination with droperidol increases clinical efficacy compared with ketamine alone.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73546,"journal":{"name":"JEM reports","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JEM reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2773232025000021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The agitated patient represents a very large clinical problem for the work of the emergency department. The therapeutic goal is rapid symptom control while ensuring maximum patient safety. Hyperactive delirium constitutes a true clinical emergency, and some sedatives carry inherent risks. Ketamine has already demonstrated remarkable safety in this setting. OBJECTIVES This study aims to indentify an effective and safe option for the rapid control of severe psychomotor agitation METHODS Our retrospective study analyzes the comparison of ketamine alone, ketamine with droperidol, and midazolam with haloperidol. RESULTS During the period of January 2022 and September 2023 we identified 66 patients with severe psychomotor agitation (13–76 years), and we demonstrated a faster and more effective response in patients treated with ketamine, and a reduction in adverse events in patients treated with ketamine and droperidol. CONCLUSIONS Our data show that patients treated with ketamine exhibit a significantly faster response, with immediate patient control, with greater safety than patients treated with midazolam. The combination with droperidol increases clinical efficacy compared with ketamine alone.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JEM reports
JEM reports Emergency Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
54 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信