Drive first or yield? Effect of complexity on cooperation behavior at deadlock-situations at T-intersections

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Nadine-Rebecca Strelau, Barbara Deml
{"title":"Drive first or yield? Effect of complexity on cooperation behavior at deadlock-situations at T-intersections","authors":"Nadine-Rebecca Strelau,&nbsp;Barbara Deml","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.12.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Deadlock-situations at intersections, where the right-of-way is not clearly regulated, pose challenges for automated vehicles (AVs) in mixed traffic. For AVs to show behavior that is accepted by all traffic participants, it is important to understand the cooperation behavior of manual drivers in these situations. Three studies were conducted where the effect of complexity on cooperation behavior at deadlock-situations was examined. Participants watched videos of approaches to T-intersections where a deadlock-situation occurred but was not yet resolved. After each video they reported their intended behavior, the perceived difficulty and visual clutter of the situation as well as the anticipated behavior of the cooperation vehicles. Complexity was manipulated with visual built clutter, pedestrians and additional traffic. Results show minimal effect of complexity on perceived difficulty and visual clutter as well as cooperation behavior. However, cooperation behavior was significantly influenced by approach position. When approaching from below drivers are more likely to yield compared to approaches from left or right. Additionally, when a vehicle is driving through the intersection directly in front of the driver they show higher probabilities of driving first through the intersection. The anticipated behavior of the cooperation vehicles is influenced both by their approach position and the right-of-way rule from the driver’s perspective, suggesting that the right-of-way rules are not correctly understood and therefore the deadlock-situation is not recognized as such. Recommendations for the behavior of automated vehicles in these situations are derived from the findings of the studies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"109 ","pages":"Pages 754-769"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824003760","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deadlock-situations at intersections, where the right-of-way is not clearly regulated, pose challenges for automated vehicles (AVs) in mixed traffic. For AVs to show behavior that is accepted by all traffic participants, it is important to understand the cooperation behavior of manual drivers in these situations. Three studies were conducted where the effect of complexity on cooperation behavior at deadlock-situations was examined. Participants watched videos of approaches to T-intersections where a deadlock-situation occurred but was not yet resolved. After each video they reported their intended behavior, the perceived difficulty and visual clutter of the situation as well as the anticipated behavior of the cooperation vehicles. Complexity was manipulated with visual built clutter, pedestrians and additional traffic. Results show minimal effect of complexity on perceived difficulty and visual clutter as well as cooperation behavior. However, cooperation behavior was significantly influenced by approach position. When approaching from below drivers are more likely to yield compared to approaches from left or right. Additionally, when a vehicle is driving through the intersection directly in front of the driver they show higher probabilities of driving first through the intersection. The anticipated behavior of the cooperation vehicles is influenced both by their approach position and the right-of-way rule from the driver’s perspective, suggesting that the right-of-way rules are not correctly understood and therefore the deadlock-situation is not recognized as such. Recommendations for the behavior of automated vehicles in these situations are derived from the findings of the studies.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信