Examining psychological factors associated with pedestrians’ technology use while walking and risky street-crossing behavior: Incorporating heterogeneity effect

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Zeinab Karami , Kayvan Aghabayk , Amin Mohammadi , Sina Rejali
{"title":"Examining psychological factors associated with pedestrians’ technology use while walking and risky street-crossing behavior: Incorporating heterogeneity effect","authors":"Zeinab Karami ,&nbsp;Kayvan Aghabayk ,&nbsp;Amin Mohammadi ,&nbsp;Sina Rejali","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The widespread integration of technology into everyday life has made pedestrians increasingly susceptible to engaging with distractions. Consequently, it is important to understand the factors that drive their use of technology while walking and the associated risky street-crossing behaviors. Given that smartphone and smartwatch use are among the most common technology-related activities in pedestrian behavior, this study aimed to investigate the influence of behavioral and psychological factors, including fear of missing out (FoMO), mindfulness, nomophobia, self-identity, and self-control on pedestrian technology use while walking (i.e., smartphone and smartwatch use) and their propensity for risky street-crossing behavior. Data were collected from an online survey of 2221 participants in different cities of Iran. A structural equation model (SEM) was developed to explore these relationships, drawing on insights from previous theoretical frameworks. To account for the effect of heterogeneity, the relationship between constructs was explored among different individual groups using Multiple Indicator Multiple Causes (MIMIC) models and Multi-Group Analysis (MGA). The results revealed that mindfulness, followed by nomophobia and self-identity, were the strongest predictors of technology use while walking. Technology use while walking was more frequent among males, individuals aged between 18 and 24, those with prior crash experience and in the trips after 4 pm. In addition, individual characteristics proved to pose a moderating effect on pedestrian technology use and its predictors. FoMO emerged to be a more significant predictor of males’ personality factors and their risky behaviour, while nomophobia, mindfulness, and self-identity were stronger predictors of females’ personality factors, technology use, and risky behaviour. The findings of this study contribute to increasing knowledge in the field of pedestrian safety and inform the development of targeted interventions aimed at mitigating risky behaviours and promoting safer urban environments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"109 ","pages":"Pages 770-791"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825000038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The widespread integration of technology into everyday life has made pedestrians increasingly susceptible to engaging with distractions. Consequently, it is important to understand the factors that drive their use of technology while walking and the associated risky street-crossing behaviors. Given that smartphone and smartwatch use are among the most common technology-related activities in pedestrian behavior, this study aimed to investigate the influence of behavioral and psychological factors, including fear of missing out (FoMO), mindfulness, nomophobia, self-identity, and self-control on pedestrian technology use while walking (i.e., smartphone and smartwatch use) and their propensity for risky street-crossing behavior. Data were collected from an online survey of 2221 participants in different cities of Iran. A structural equation model (SEM) was developed to explore these relationships, drawing on insights from previous theoretical frameworks. To account for the effect of heterogeneity, the relationship between constructs was explored among different individual groups using Multiple Indicator Multiple Causes (MIMIC) models and Multi-Group Analysis (MGA). The results revealed that mindfulness, followed by nomophobia and self-identity, were the strongest predictors of technology use while walking. Technology use while walking was more frequent among males, individuals aged between 18 and 24, those with prior crash experience and in the trips after 4 pm. In addition, individual characteristics proved to pose a moderating effect on pedestrian technology use and its predictors. FoMO emerged to be a more significant predictor of males’ personality factors and their risky behaviour, while nomophobia, mindfulness, and self-identity were stronger predictors of females’ personality factors, technology use, and risky behaviour. The findings of this study contribute to increasing knowledge in the field of pedestrian safety and inform the development of targeted interventions aimed at mitigating risky behaviours and promoting safer urban environments.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信