Lateral extra-articular procedures in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Narrative review on current evidence

Takeo Tokura , Alan M.J. Getgood
{"title":"Lateral extra-articular procedures in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Narrative review on current evidence","authors":"Takeo Tokura ,&nbsp;Alan M.J. Getgood","doi":"10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) have evolved over time, but residual anterolateral rotatory instability (ALRI) often persists, which can result in poor patient-reported outcomes and an increased rate of graft failure. The re-emergence of lateral extra-articular procedures (LEAPs), either lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) or the newer anterolateral ligament reconstruction, in combination with ACLR has changed practice significantly. Here we describe a literature review of ACLR and LEAPs, focusing on LET.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Studies describing anatomy, history, biomechanical and clinical studies, and current practice regarding ACLR and LET were searched in PubMed. Our current practice and future directions are also discussed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There is accumulating evidence supporting the effectiveness of LEAP in controlling ALRI and reducing the risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure. A number of cadaveric studies have shown that LEAP would help control ALRI in combination with ACLR. There are also several randomized controlled studies showing that addition of LET significantly reduces the risk of ACL graft failure. However, only a paucity of data about its long-term outcomes are currently available.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>LEAP has had a great impact on our daily practice. However, indications, optimal ACL graft type, and long-term outcomes still need to be thoroughly investigated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Joint Surgery and Research","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages 42-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Joint Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949705124000343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) have evolved over time, but residual anterolateral rotatory instability (ALRI) often persists, which can result in poor patient-reported outcomes and an increased rate of graft failure. The re-emergence of lateral extra-articular procedures (LEAPs), either lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) or the newer anterolateral ligament reconstruction, in combination with ACLR has changed practice significantly. Here we describe a literature review of ACLR and LEAPs, focusing on LET.

Methods

Studies describing anatomy, history, biomechanical and clinical studies, and current practice regarding ACLR and LET were searched in PubMed. Our current practice and future directions are also discussed.

Results

There is accumulating evidence supporting the effectiveness of LEAP in controlling ALRI and reducing the risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure. A number of cadaveric studies have shown that LEAP would help control ALRI in combination with ACLR. There are also several randomized controlled studies showing that addition of LET significantly reduces the risk of ACL graft failure. However, only a paucity of data about its long-term outcomes are currently available.

Conclusions

LEAP has had a great impact on our daily practice. However, indications, optimal ACL graft type, and long-term outcomes still need to be thoroughly investigated.
前交叉韧带重建的外侧关节外手术:对当前证据的叙述性回顾
目的:前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)技术随着时间的推移而发展,但残留的前外侧旋转不稳定(ALRI)经常持续存在,这可能导致患者报告的结果较差和移植物失败率增加。外侧关节外手术(LEAPs)的再次出现,无论是外侧关节外肌腱固定术(LET)还是较新的前外侧韧带重建,结合ACLR已经显著改变了实践。在这里,我们描述了ACLR和飞跃的文献综述,重点是LET。方法在PubMed中检索描述ACLR和LET的解剖学、历史、生物力学和临床研究以及当前实践的研究。并讨论了我们目前的实践和未来的发展方向。结果越来越多的证据支持LEAP在控制ALRI和降低前交叉韧带(ACL)移植失败风险方面的有效性。许多尸体研究表明,LEAP与ACLR联合使用有助于控制ALRI。也有一些随机对照研究表明,添加LET可显著降低前交叉韧带移植失败的风险。然而,目前关于其长期结果的数据很少。结论sleap对我们的日常实践产生了很大的影响。然而,适应症、最佳前交叉韧带移植类型和长期结果仍需深入研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信