Lateral extra-articular procedures in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Narrative review on current evidence

Takeo Tokura , Alan M.J. Getgood
{"title":"Lateral extra-articular procedures in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Narrative review on current evidence","authors":"Takeo Tokura ,&nbsp;Alan M.J. Getgood","doi":"10.1016/j.jjoisr.2024.12.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) have evolved over time, but residual anterolateral rotatory instability (ALRI) often persists, which can result in poor patient-reported outcomes and an increased rate of graft failure. The re-emergence of lateral extra-articular procedures (LEAPs), either lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) or the newer anterolateral ligament reconstruction, in combination with ACLR has changed practice significantly. Here we describe a literature review of ACLR and LEAPs, focusing on LET.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Studies describing anatomy, history, biomechanical and clinical studies, and current practice regarding ACLR and LET were searched in PubMed. Our current practice and future directions are also discussed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There is accumulating evidence supporting the effectiveness of LEAP in controlling ALRI and reducing the risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure. A number of cadaveric studies have shown that LEAP would help control ALRI in combination with ACLR. There are also several randomized controlled studies showing that addition of LET significantly reduces the risk of ACL graft failure. However, only a paucity of data about its long-term outcomes are currently available.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>LEAP has had a great impact on our daily practice. However, indications, optimal ACL graft type, and long-term outcomes still need to be thoroughly investigated.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Joint Surgery and Research","volume":"3 1","pages":"Pages 42-47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Joint Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949705124000343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) have evolved over time, but residual anterolateral rotatory instability (ALRI) often persists, which can result in poor patient-reported outcomes and an increased rate of graft failure. The re-emergence of lateral extra-articular procedures (LEAPs), either lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) or the newer anterolateral ligament reconstruction, in combination with ACLR has changed practice significantly. Here we describe a literature review of ACLR and LEAPs, focusing on LET.

Methods

Studies describing anatomy, history, biomechanical and clinical studies, and current practice regarding ACLR and LET were searched in PubMed. Our current practice and future directions are also discussed.

Results

There is accumulating evidence supporting the effectiveness of LEAP in controlling ALRI and reducing the risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure. A number of cadaveric studies have shown that LEAP would help control ALRI in combination with ACLR. There are also several randomized controlled studies showing that addition of LET significantly reduces the risk of ACL graft failure. However, only a paucity of data about its long-term outcomes are currently available.

Conclusions

LEAP has had a great impact on our daily practice. However, indications, optimal ACL graft type, and long-term outcomes still need to be thoroughly investigated.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信