Too sick to take over? − Impact of car sickness on cognitive performance related to driving in the context of automated driving

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Myriam Metzulat , Barbara Metz , Andreas Landau , Alexandra Neukum , Wilfried Kunde
{"title":"Too sick to take over? − Impact of car sickness on cognitive performance related to driving in the context of automated driving","authors":"Myriam Metzulat ,&nbsp;Barbara Metz ,&nbsp;Andreas Landau ,&nbsp;Alexandra Neukum ,&nbsp;Wilfried Kunde","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2024.12.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Car sickness in automated driving is not only a comfort issue but might also negatively affect performance. It could be a safety risk if a car-sick driver has to take over, for example in an emergency situation, and their ability to safely control the vehicle is impaired. Previous studies have shown negative effects of other types of motion sickness, such as sea sickness or simulator sickness, on various cognitive performance measures. This is the first study to investigate the effects of actual car sickness in a real vehicle on several performance requirements relevant to driving. Data from two independent studies with <em>N</em> = 20 and <em>N</em> = 47 participants are reported. In both studies, performance tasks were completed before and after car sickness was induced in a real vehicle ride. These tasks represented different aspects of driving, i.e. a visual search task for visual selection, a simple reaction task for reactions to sudden events, a mental rotation task for visuo-spatial ability and a tracking task for hand-eye coordination. Reaction times were significantly prolonged and hand-eye coordination significantly impaired as symptoms of car sickness increased. Visuo-spatial performance also decreased with increasing car sickness, but not significantly (<em>p</em> = 0.059). Visual search was not negatively affected by car sickness. Subjectively, car sickness reduced the ability to concentrate and increased the subjective effort to complete tasks. The results indicate that actual driving performance may be affected by car sickness. The transferability of the results should be verified in a real driving study.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"109 ","pages":"Pages 480-500"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847824003681","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Car sickness in automated driving is not only a comfort issue but might also negatively affect performance. It could be a safety risk if a car-sick driver has to take over, for example in an emergency situation, and their ability to safely control the vehicle is impaired. Previous studies have shown negative effects of other types of motion sickness, such as sea sickness or simulator sickness, on various cognitive performance measures. This is the first study to investigate the effects of actual car sickness in a real vehicle on several performance requirements relevant to driving. Data from two independent studies with N = 20 and N = 47 participants are reported. In both studies, performance tasks were completed before and after car sickness was induced in a real vehicle ride. These tasks represented different aspects of driving, i.e. a visual search task for visual selection, a simple reaction task for reactions to sudden events, a mental rotation task for visuo-spatial ability and a tracking task for hand-eye coordination. Reaction times were significantly prolonged and hand-eye coordination significantly impaired as symptoms of car sickness increased. Visuo-spatial performance also decreased with increasing car sickness, but not significantly (p = 0.059). Visual search was not negatively affected by car sickness. Subjectively, car sickness reduced the ability to concentrate and increased the subjective effort to complete tasks. The results indicate that actual driving performance may be affected by car sickness. The transferability of the results should be verified in a real driving study.
病得无法接管?−在自动驾驶环境下晕车对驾驶认知能力的影响
自动驾驶中的晕车不仅是一个舒适问题,还可能对性能产生负面影响。如果晕车的司机不得不接手,比如在紧急情况下,他们安全控制车辆的能力会受到损害,这可能是一种安全风险。之前的研究已经表明,晕船或晕船等其他类型的晕车会对各种认知表现产生负面影响。这是第一个调查真实车辆中晕车对驾驶相关性能要求的影响的研究。数据来自两项独立研究,分别为N = 20和N = 47名参与者。在这两项研究中,表现任务都是在真正的汽车行驶中引起晕车之前和之后完成的。这些任务代表了驾驶的不同方面,即视觉选择的视觉搜索任务,对突发事件的反应的简单反应任务,视觉空间能力的心理旋转任务和手眼协调的跟踪任务。随着晕车症状的增加,反应时间明显延长,手眼协调能力明显受损。视觉空间表现也随着晕车的增加而下降,但不显著(p = 0.059)。晕车对视觉搜索没有负面影响。主观上,晕车降低了注意力集中的能力,增加了完成任务的主观努力。结果表明,晕车可能会影响驾驶员的实际驾驶表现。结果的可转移性应在实际驾驶研究中得到验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信