Crossing the line: Impact of pedestrian group behavior on individual crossing decisions in AV interactions

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Maximilian Hübner, Jan-Niklas Birger Stockmann, Klaus Bengler
{"title":"Crossing the line: Impact of pedestrian group behavior on individual crossing decisions in AV interactions","authors":"Maximilian Hübner,&nbsp;Jan-Niklas Birger Stockmann,&nbsp;Klaus Bengler","doi":"10.1016/j.trf.2025.01.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research and development in automated driving are steadily progressing, with an increasing number of vehicles equipped with these systems participating in road traffic. Ensuring safe and robust interactions between automated vehicles and other road users is essential, especially in urban environments where interactions between vehicles and groups of pedestrians are common. Literature shows that external human–machine interfaces on automated vehicles might serve as a possible solution for such communication. Pedestrian groups have not been adequately considered in research on road crossings in front of automated vehicles equipped with external human–machine interfaces. This study investigates whether and how the behavior of a pedestrian group affects a single pedestrians behavior and perception of crossing in front of an automated vehicle equipped with an external human–machine interface. A virtual reality study with 44 participants revealed that pedestrians adjust their crossing behavior based on the behavior of others, leading to both improved efficiency and potential safety risks during crossings. Subjective measures revealed increased trust in automated vehicles with repeated exposure. However, trust remained essentially unchanged across different behaviors of the pedestrian group. After the experiment, almost three-quarters of the participants reported a subjective influence of the pedestrian group. Objectively, participants crossed earlier and more confidently when the group began to cross the street, improving efficiency in scenarios where the automated vehicle stopped. The same behavior raises safety concerns in scenarios where the automated vehicle is about to pass, as participants follow the pedestrian group early. These findings highlight the need for automated vehicle communication systems to consider group dynamics to ensure safety and efficiency.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48355,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","volume":"109 ","pages":"Pages 921-937"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369847825000208","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research and development in automated driving are steadily progressing, with an increasing number of vehicles equipped with these systems participating in road traffic. Ensuring safe and robust interactions between automated vehicles and other road users is essential, especially in urban environments where interactions between vehicles and groups of pedestrians are common. Literature shows that external human–machine interfaces on automated vehicles might serve as a possible solution for such communication. Pedestrian groups have not been adequately considered in research on road crossings in front of automated vehicles equipped with external human–machine interfaces. This study investigates whether and how the behavior of a pedestrian group affects a single pedestrians behavior and perception of crossing in front of an automated vehicle equipped with an external human–machine interface. A virtual reality study with 44 participants revealed that pedestrians adjust their crossing behavior based on the behavior of others, leading to both improved efficiency and potential safety risks during crossings. Subjective measures revealed increased trust in automated vehicles with repeated exposure. However, trust remained essentially unchanged across different behaviors of the pedestrian group. After the experiment, almost three-quarters of the participants reported a subjective influence of the pedestrian group. Objectively, participants crossed earlier and more confidently when the group began to cross the street, improving efficiency in scenarios where the automated vehicle stopped. The same behavior raises safety concerns in scenarios where the automated vehicle is about to pass, as participants follow the pedestrian group early. These findings highlight the need for automated vehicle communication systems to consider group dynamics to ensure safety and efficiency.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
239
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour focuses on the behavioural and psychological aspects of traffic and transport. The aim of the journal is to enhance theory development, improve the quality of empirical studies and to stimulate the application of research findings in practice. TRF provides a focus and a means of communication for the considerable amount of research activities that are now being carried out in this field. The journal provides a forum for transportation researchers, psychologists, ergonomists, engineers and policy-makers with an interest in traffic and transport psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信