“Families are a resource, not the enemy”: Canadian family caregivers' experiences of COVID-19 pandemic visitor restrictions

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 GERONTOLOGY
Kirstian Gibson , Heather Alford , Heather Ward , Paulette V. Hunter
{"title":"“Families are a resource, not the enemy”: Canadian family caregivers' experiences of COVID-19 pandemic visitor restrictions","authors":"Kirstian Gibson ,&nbsp;Heather Alford ,&nbsp;Heather Ward ,&nbsp;Paulette V. Hunter","doi":"10.1016/j.jaging.2025.101311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Canadian long-term care homes implemented strict visitor restrictions at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic to control the spread of the virus among residents. These restrictions extended to family caregivers, a significant provider of in-person physical and social care, preventing them from entering long-term care homes. The purpose of the current study was to explore the experiences and observations of family caregivers during the prolonged visitor restrictions. Fifteen semi-structured, one-on-one interviews were conducted with family caregivers of persons living in long-term care and analysed using a codebook thematic approach. Four themes were identified: a) pandemic policies dismissed family relationships; b) prolonged separation traumatised families; c) family caregivers were resourceful in fulfilling their roles; and d) family caregivers are calling for collaborative change. Our findings reflect how long-term care policies and standards that lacked a family-centred lens resulted in barriers to care and led to serious concerns about the quality of life of residents and serious distress among family caregivers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging Studies","volume":"72 ","pages":"Article 101311"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890406525000052","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Canadian long-term care homes implemented strict visitor restrictions at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic to control the spread of the virus among residents. These restrictions extended to family caregivers, a significant provider of in-person physical and social care, preventing them from entering long-term care homes. The purpose of the current study was to explore the experiences and observations of family caregivers during the prolonged visitor restrictions. Fifteen semi-structured, one-on-one interviews were conducted with family caregivers of persons living in long-term care and analysed using a codebook thematic approach. Four themes were identified: a) pandemic policies dismissed family relationships; b) prolonged separation traumatised families; c) family caregivers were resourceful in fulfilling their roles; and d) family caregivers are calling for collaborative change. Our findings reflect how long-term care policies and standards that lacked a family-centred lens resulted in barriers to care and led to serious concerns about the quality of life of residents and serious distress among family caregivers.
“家庭是一种资源,而不是敌人”:加拿大家庭照顾者在COVID-19大流行访客限制中的经历
加拿大长期护理院在COVID-19大流行开始时实施了严格的访客限制,以控制病毒在居民中的传播。这些限制扩大到家庭照顾者,他们是面对面的身体和社会照顾的重要提供者,阻止他们进入长期护理院。本研究的目的是探讨家庭照顾者在长期访客限制期间的经验和观察。对长期护理人员的家庭照顾者进行了15次半结构化的一对一访谈,并使用代码本主题方法进行了分析。确定了四个主题:a)大流行病政策忽视家庭关系;B)长期分离,受创伤的家庭;C)家庭照顾者在履行其角色时足智多谋;d)家庭照顾者正在呼吁合作变革。我们的研究结果反映了缺乏以家庭为中心的长期护理政策和标准如何导致护理障碍,并导致对居民生活质量的严重担忧和家庭照顾者的严重困扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
17.40%
发文量
70
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging Studies features scholarly papers offering new interpretations that challenge existing theory and empirical work. Articles need not deal with the field of aging as a whole, but with any defensibly relevant topic pertinent to the aging experience and related to the broad concerns and subject matter of the social and behavioral sciences and the humanities. The journal emphasizes innovations and critique - new directions in general - regardless of theoretical or methodological orientation or academic discipline. Critical, empirical, or theoretical contributions are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信