Conceptions to classrooms: The influence of teacher knowledge on inclusive classroom practice

Q1 Social Sciences
Stuart Woodcock , Joanna Anderson
{"title":"Conceptions to classrooms: The influence of teacher knowledge on inclusive classroom practice","authors":"Stuart Woodcock ,&nbsp;Joanna Anderson","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The broad and subjective nature of inclusive education has led to varied interpretations, posing a significant challenge for its advocates, as there is no universally agreed-upon method for its implementation. Additionally, ongoing concerns persist regarding the \"inclusion for all\" approach, with arguments suggesting it cannot adequately meet the educational needs of every student due to limitations in time, resources, and support. Teachers play a pivotal role in inclusive education. Their actions influence classroom culture, and the decisions they make about how lessons are taught and assessed, directly impact on student engagement and success in learning. This study examined 140 primary teachers’ perceptions of inclusion and inclusive education practices across New South Wales, Australia. Semi-structured interviews were carried out and thematic analysis was used to investigate and probe the qualitative data. Findings reveal that while teachers who perceive inclusive education as a categorical and ambivalent paradigm enact teaching practices supported by research, they may not necessarily demonstrate inclusion in all practices. Inclusion can often be conceptually confusing, making the need for consistency across all stakeholders (e.g., policymakers, school leaders) imperative if teachers are going to meet the educational and social needs of diverse cohorts of students.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73445,"journal":{"name":"International journal of educational research open","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100412"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of educational research open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374024000943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The broad and subjective nature of inclusive education has led to varied interpretations, posing a significant challenge for its advocates, as there is no universally agreed-upon method for its implementation. Additionally, ongoing concerns persist regarding the "inclusion for all" approach, with arguments suggesting it cannot adequately meet the educational needs of every student due to limitations in time, resources, and support. Teachers play a pivotal role in inclusive education. Their actions influence classroom culture, and the decisions they make about how lessons are taught and assessed, directly impact on student engagement and success in learning. This study examined 140 primary teachers’ perceptions of inclusion and inclusive education practices across New South Wales, Australia. Semi-structured interviews were carried out and thematic analysis was used to investigate and probe the qualitative data. Findings reveal that while teachers who perceive inclusive education as a categorical and ambivalent paradigm enact teaching practices supported by research, they may not necessarily demonstrate inclusion in all practices. Inclusion can often be conceptually confusing, making the need for consistency across all stakeholders (e.g., policymakers, school leaders) imperative if teachers are going to meet the educational and social needs of diverse cohorts of students.
对课堂的观念:教师知识对包容性课堂实践的影响
全纳教育的广泛性和主观性导致了各种各样的解释,对其倡导者构成了重大挑战,因为没有普遍同意的实施方法。此外,对“包容所有人”方法的持续关注仍然存在,有观点认为,由于时间、资源和支持的限制,它不能充分满足每个学生的教育需求。教师在全纳教育中发挥着关键作用。他们的行为影响着课堂文化,他们所做的关于如何教授和评估课程的决定,直接影响着学生的参与和学习的成功。本研究调查了澳大利亚新南威尔士州140名小学教师对包容性和全纳教育实践的看法。采用半结构化访谈和专题分析对定性数据进行调查和探讨。研究结果表明,虽然将全纳教育视为一种明确而矛盾的范式的教师制定了有研究支持的教学实践,但他们不一定在所有实践中都表现出包容性。如果教师要满足不同学生群体的教育和社会需求,包容性在概念上往往是令人困惑的,因此需要所有利益相关者(例如政策制定者、学校领导)之间的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信