Conceptions to classrooms: The influence of teacher knowledge on inclusive classroom practice

Q1 Social Sciences
Stuart Woodcock , Joanna Anderson
{"title":"Conceptions to classrooms: The influence of teacher knowledge on inclusive classroom practice","authors":"Stuart Woodcock ,&nbsp;Joanna Anderson","doi":"10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The broad and subjective nature of inclusive education has led to varied interpretations, posing a significant challenge for its advocates, as there is no universally agreed-upon method for its implementation. Additionally, ongoing concerns persist regarding the \"inclusion for all\" approach, with arguments suggesting it cannot adequately meet the educational needs of every student due to limitations in time, resources, and support. Teachers play a pivotal role in inclusive education. Their actions influence classroom culture, and the decisions they make about how lessons are taught and assessed, directly impact on student engagement and success in learning. This study examined 140 primary teachers’ perceptions of inclusion and inclusive education practices across New South Wales, Australia. Semi-structured interviews were carried out and thematic analysis was used to investigate and probe the qualitative data. Findings reveal that while teachers who perceive inclusive education as a categorical and ambivalent paradigm enact teaching practices supported by research, they may not necessarily demonstrate inclusion in all practices. Inclusion can often be conceptually confusing, making the need for consistency across all stakeholders (e.g., policymakers, school leaders) imperative if teachers are going to meet the educational and social needs of diverse cohorts of students.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73445,"journal":{"name":"International journal of educational research open","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100412"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of educational research open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666374024000943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The broad and subjective nature of inclusive education has led to varied interpretations, posing a significant challenge for its advocates, as there is no universally agreed-upon method for its implementation. Additionally, ongoing concerns persist regarding the "inclusion for all" approach, with arguments suggesting it cannot adequately meet the educational needs of every student due to limitations in time, resources, and support. Teachers play a pivotal role in inclusive education. Their actions influence classroom culture, and the decisions they make about how lessons are taught and assessed, directly impact on student engagement and success in learning. This study examined 140 primary teachers’ perceptions of inclusion and inclusive education practices across New South Wales, Australia. Semi-structured interviews were carried out and thematic analysis was used to investigate and probe the qualitative data. Findings reveal that while teachers who perceive inclusive education as a categorical and ambivalent paradigm enact teaching practices supported by research, they may not necessarily demonstrate inclusion in all practices. Inclusion can often be conceptually confusing, making the need for consistency across all stakeholders (e.g., policymakers, school leaders) imperative if teachers are going to meet the educational and social needs of diverse cohorts of students.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
69 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信