Recognising and responding to acute patient deterioration in the perioperative environment – A simulation-based learning approach to meeting National Healthcare Standards criteria

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Scott Lamont , Zoe Kumar , Pooja Bhusal
{"title":"Recognising and responding to acute patient deterioration in the perioperative environment – A simulation-based learning approach to meeting National Healthcare Standards criteria","authors":"Scott Lamont ,&nbsp;Zoe Kumar ,&nbsp;Pooja Bhusal","doi":"10.1016/j.colegn.2024.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Deterioration in acute healthcare settings is associated with serious adverse sequelae. A National Standards framework for healthcare facilities in Australia has mandated that such facilities provide evidence that satisfies criteria relating to acute deterioration recognition and response. Whilst education and training of healthcare practitioners have been prominent since National Standards inception, state-wide mandatory training programs have not been sensitive to the perioperative context.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To evaluate the effectiveness of a perioperative simulation-based learning program in building capacity for perioperative staff in acute patient deterioration recognition and response.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multiple group post-test design using quantitative measures was undertaken. Participants were a consecutive sample of perioperative nursing staff (n=56) employed across three hospitals in Sydney who self-enrolled in simulation-based learning workshops. Each six-hour workshop focussed on four acute deterioration scenarios: Anaphylaxis, Malignant Hyperthermia, Post-Partum Haemorrhage, and Local Anaesthetic Systemic Toxicity. Simulation effectiveness was measured using the 19-item Simulation Effectiveness Tool–Modified. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and qualitative content analysis was used for an open-ended question.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>All 19 items elicited a high degree of ‘strongly agree’, ranging from 57.1% to 89.6%, with only four of the 19 items achieving less than 80% ‘strongly agree’. Content analysis generated two primary categories: <em>‘Self-efficacy enabling professional autonomy’</em> and <em>‘Relevant and authentic representation’</em>.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Perioperative simulation-based learning can enhance clinical proficiency and professional autonomy, whilst developing clinical reasoning, teamwork, and delegation skills.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Perioperative simulation-based learning was perceived as effective in preparing nursing staff working in the perioperative specialty for real-world clinical emergencies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55241,"journal":{"name":"Collegian","volume":"32 1","pages":"Pages 46-52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegian","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769624000830","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Deterioration in acute healthcare settings is associated with serious adverse sequelae. A National Standards framework for healthcare facilities in Australia has mandated that such facilities provide evidence that satisfies criteria relating to acute deterioration recognition and response. Whilst education and training of healthcare practitioners have been prominent since National Standards inception, state-wide mandatory training programs have not been sensitive to the perioperative context.

Aim

To evaluate the effectiveness of a perioperative simulation-based learning program in building capacity for perioperative staff in acute patient deterioration recognition and response.

Methods

A multiple group post-test design using quantitative measures was undertaken. Participants were a consecutive sample of perioperative nursing staff (n=56) employed across three hospitals in Sydney who self-enrolled in simulation-based learning workshops. Each six-hour workshop focussed on four acute deterioration scenarios: Anaphylaxis, Malignant Hyperthermia, Post-Partum Haemorrhage, and Local Anaesthetic Systemic Toxicity. Simulation effectiveness was measured using the 19-item Simulation Effectiveness Tool–Modified. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and qualitative content analysis was used for an open-ended question.

Findings

All 19 items elicited a high degree of ‘strongly agree’, ranging from 57.1% to 89.6%, with only four of the 19 items achieving less than 80% ‘strongly agree’. Content analysis generated two primary categories: ‘Self-efficacy enabling professional autonomy’ and ‘Relevant and authentic representation’.

Discussion

Perioperative simulation-based learning can enhance clinical proficiency and professional autonomy, whilst developing clinical reasoning, teamwork, and delegation skills.

Conclusion

Perioperative simulation-based learning was perceived as effective in preparing nursing staff working in the perioperative specialty for real-world clinical emergencies.
在围手术期环境中识别和应对急性患者恶化——满足国家医疗保健标准的基于模拟的学习方法
背景:急性医疗环境的恶化与严重的不良后遗症有关。澳大利亚卫生保健设施国家标准框架规定,这些设施必须提供符合急性恶化识别和反应标准的证据。虽然自国家标准开始以来,医疗保健从业人员的教育和培训一直很突出,但全州范围内的强制性培训计划对围手术期环境并不敏感。目的评价围手术期模拟学习项目在提高围手术期工作人员对急性患者恶化的识别和反应能力方面的有效性。方法采用定量方法进行多组后验设计。参与者是悉尼三家医院围手术期护理人员(n=56)的连续样本,他们自行参加了基于模拟的学习研讨会。每个六小时的研讨会集中在四种急性恶化情况:过敏反应,恶性高热,产后出血和局部麻醉全身毒性。模拟有效性使用19项模拟有效性工具修正测量。计算描述性统计数据,对开放式问题采用定性内容分析。结果:所有19个问题的“非常同意”程度都很高,从57.1%到89.6%不等,其中只有4个问题的“非常同意”程度低于80%。内容分析产生了两个主要类别:“实现专业自主的自我效能”和“相关和真实的表现”。基于围手术期模拟的学习可以提高临床熟练程度和专业自主权,同时培养临床推理、团队合作和授权技能。结论围手术期模拟学习可有效帮助围手术期专业护理人员应对现实世界的临床紧急情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Collegian
Collegian NURSING-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Collegian: The Australian Journal of Nursing Practice, Scholarship and Research is the official journal of Australian College of Nursing (ACN). The journal aims to reflect the broad interests of nurses and the nursing profession, and to challenge nurses on emerging areas of interest. It publishes research articles and scholarly discussion of nursing practice, policy and professional issues. Papers published in the journal are peer reviewed by a double blind process using reviewers who meet high standards of academic and clinical expertise. Invited papers that contribute to nursing knowledge and debate are published at the discretion of the Editor. The journal, online only from 2016, is available to members of ACN and also by separate subscription. ACN believes that each and every nurse in Australia should have the opportunity to grow their career through quality education, and further our profession through representation. ACN is the voice of influence, providing the nursing expertise and experience required when government and key stakeholders are deciding the future of health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信