Experiment unlearned: Unpacking leadership and learning of key actors in a Hong Kong street experiment

IF 2.7 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Kristen J. Zhao , Robin A. Chang , Guibo Sun
{"title":"Experiment unlearned: Unpacking leadership and learning of key actors in a Hong Kong street experiment","authors":"Kristen J. Zhao ,&nbsp;Robin A. Chang ,&nbsp;Guibo Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.urbmob.2024.100091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Street experiments are implemented worldwide, yet they have not achieved notable transformative change in Hong Kong despite numerous initiatives. This study explores the reasons for their limited impact through a case study of the Healthy Street Lab 2.0, a street experiment organised by a civil society group. This initiative involved collaboration between the government and civil society, using a co-creative design approach. Although well-resourced, the experiment did not achieve its goals, with most design prototypes eventually discontinued. Through interviews and surveys, we collected insights from key stakeholders (<em>n</em> = 13) regarding their motivations, challenges, and reflections and participants for their feedback (<em>n</em> = 14). Our analysis reveals how the dynamics of low willingness to learn and the capacity to lead among key actors led to a reduced vision, scope, and design, ultimately missing initial objectives. We underscore the role of power differentials and institutional barriers in this process. We conclude by offering reflection points for stakeholders to consider in future experiments. This study contributes to understanding learning and leadership dynamics in the evolving literature on the transformative potential of street experiments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100852,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Mobility","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100091"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091724000219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Street experiments are implemented worldwide, yet they have not achieved notable transformative change in Hong Kong despite numerous initiatives. This study explores the reasons for their limited impact through a case study of the Healthy Street Lab 2.0, a street experiment organised by a civil society group. This initiative involved collaboration between the government and civil society, using a co-creative design approach. Although well-resourced, the experiment did not achieve its goals, with most design prototypes eventually discontinued. Through interviews and surveys, we collected insights from key stakeholders (n = 13) regarding their motivations, challenges, and reflections and participants for their feedback (n = 14). Our analysis reveals how the dynamics of low willingness to learn and the capacity to lead among key actors led to a reduced vision, scope, and design, ultimately missing initial objectives. We underscore the role of power differentials and institutional barriers in this process. We conclude by offering reflection points for stakeholders to consider in future experiments. This study contributes to understanding learning and leadership dynamics in the evolving literature on the transformative potential of street experiments.
未学习的实验:香港街头实验中关键角色的领导力与学习
街头实验在世界各地都有实施,但在香港,尽管有许多倡议,但它们并没有取得显著的变革。本研究通过一个由民间社会团体组织的街头实验“健康街道实验室2.0”的案例研究,探讨了它们影响有限的原因。这一倡议涉及政府和民间社会之间的合作,采用共同创造的设计方法。虽然有充足的资源,但实验并没有达到目标,大多数设计原型最终都停止了。通过访谈和调查,我们收集了主要利益相关者(n = 13)关于他们的动机、挑战和反思的见解,并收集了参与者的反馈(n = 14)。我们的分析揭示了低学习意愿和领导关键参与者的能力如何导致视野、范围和设计的缩小,最终失去了最初的目标。我们强调权力差别和体制障碍在这一进程中的作用。最后,我们提供了一些反思点,供利益相关者在未来的实验中考虑。本研究有助于理解街头实验变革潜力的不断发展的文献中的学习和领导动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信