From temporary bike lanes to a cycling oriented mobility paradigm. The case of Lyon during and after the pandemic of COVID-19

IF 2.7 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Nathalie Ortar, Patricia Lejoux, Nicolas Ovtracht
{"title":"From temporary bike lanes to a cycling oriented mobility paradigm. The case of Lyon during and after the pandemic of COVID-19","authors":"Nathalie Ortar,&nbsp;Patricia Lejoux,&nbsp;Nicolas Ovtracht","doi":"10.1016/j.urbmob.2025.100103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>During the COVID-19 pandemic, cycling was presented as a potential solution to health and environmental challenges in everyday mobility. In Lyon (France), these street experiments posed two challenges for the city authorities: in the short term, to enable people to access essential services and shops while respecting the principles of physical separation; in the long term, to promote a new bicycle-oriented mobility paradigm that goes beyond infrastructure and includes velonomy and velomobility as a system. The aim of this article is to focus on the experience of tactical urbanism during the COVID-19 pandemic in the city of Lyon, the second largest city in France, and to investigate whether these pop-up infrastructures have facilitated a shift towards a cycling oriented mobility paradigm. In this article, we use three types of data: the first comes from a geomatic approach to map the changes, the second is an analysis of the policy context, and the third is the practices of cyclists. The results highlight that tactical urbanism accelerated the adoption of cycling through temporary infrastructure, structural changes, and expanded cycling routes. This approach improved connectivity, safety, and inclusivity while promoting cycling as a viable mode of transport. Despite initial political consensus, challenges emerged, including limited public recognition of these measures as policy and criticism of safety and navigation in certain designs. Efforts to institutionalize cycling policy have reduced car dominance and expanded public transport, but socio-spatial inequalities and low engagement from working-class communities persist. Inclusive cycling requires addressing diverse user needs, socio-economic barriers, and intersectional issues.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100852,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Mobility","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100103"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091725000056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, cycling was presented as a potential solution to health and environmental challenges in everyday mobility. In Lyon (France), these street experiments posed two challenges for the city authorities: in the short term, to enable people to access essential services and shops while respecting the principles of physical separation; in the long term, to promote a new bicycle-oriented mobility paradigm that goes beyond infrastructure and includes velonomy and velomobility as a system. The aim of this article is to focus on the experience of tactical urbanism during the COVID-19 pandemic in the city of Lyon, the second largest city in France, and to investigate whether these pop-up infrastructures have facilitated a shift towards a cycling oriented mobility paradigm. In this article, we use three types of data: the first comes from a geomatic approach to map the changes, the second is an analysis of the policy context, and the third is the practices of cyclists. The results highlight that tactical urbanism accelerated the adoption of cycling through temporary infrastructure, structural changes, and expanded cycling routes. This approach improved connectivity, safety, and inclusivity while promoting cycling as a viable mode of transport. Despite initial political consensus, challenges emerged, including limited public recognition of these measures as policy and criticism of safety and navigation in certain designs. Efforts to institutionalize cycling policy have reduced car dominance and expanded public transport, but socio-spatial inequalities and low engagement from working-class communities persist. Inclusive cycling requires addressing diverse user needs, socio-economic barriers, and intersectional issues.
从临时自行车道到以自行车为导向的交通模式。2019冠状病毒病大流行期间和之后的里昂案例
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,自行车被认为是解决日常交通中健康和环境挑战的潜在解决方案。在法国里昂,这些街头实验给城市当局带来了两个挑战:在短期内,使人们能够在尊重物理隔离原则的同时获得基本服务和商店;从长远来看,促进一种新的以自行车为导向的交通模式,这种模式超越了基础设施,将经济和速度作为一个系统。本文的目的是关注法国第二大城市里昂在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的战术城市主义经验,并调查这些弹出式基础设施是否促进了向以自行车为导向的交通模式的转变。在本文中,我们使用了三种类型的数据:第一种来自地理方法来绘制变化,第二种是对政策背景的分析,第三种是骑自行车的人的实践。研究结果强调,通过临时基础设施、结构变化和扩大自行车路线,战术城市化加速了自行车的采用。这种方法改善了连通性、安全性和包容性,同时促进了自行车作为一种可行的交通方式。尽管初步达成了政治共识,但挑战还是出现了,包括公众对这些措施作为政策的认识有限,以及对某些设计的安全和导航的批评。将自行车政策制度化的努力减少了汽车的主导地位,扩大了公共交通,但社会空间不平等和工人阶级社区的低参与度仍然存在。包容性骑行需要解决不同的用户需求、社会经济障碍和交叉问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信