From temporary bike lanes to a cycling oriented mobility paradigm. The case of Lyon during and after the pandemic of COVID-19

IF 2.7 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Nathalie Ortar, Patricia Lejoux, Nicolas Ovtracht
{"title":"From temporary bike lanes to a cycling oriented mobility paradigm. The case of Lyon during and after the pandemic of COVID-19","authors":"Nathalie Ortar,&nbsp;Patricia Lejoux,&nbsp;Nicolas Ovtracht","doi":"10.1016/j.urbmob.2025.100103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>During the COVID-19 pandemic, cycling was presented as a potential solution to health and environmental challenges in everyday mobility. In Lyon (France), these street experiments posed two challenges for the city authorities: in the short term, to enable people to access essential services and shops while respecting the principles of physical separation; in the long term, to promote a new bicycle-oriented mobility paradigm that goes beyond infrastructure and includes velonomy and velomobility as a system. The aim of this article is to focus on the experience of tactical urbanism during the COVID-19 pandemic in the city of Lyon, the second largest city in France, and to investigate whether these pop-up infrastructures have facilitated a shift towards a cycling oriented mobility paradigm. In this article, we use three types of data: the first comes from a geomatic approach to map the changes, the second is an analysis of the policy context, and the third is the practices of cyclists. The results highlight that tactical urbanism accelerated the adoption of cycling through temporary infrastructure, structural changes, and expanded cycling routes. This approach improved connectivity, safety, and inclusivity while promoting cycling as a viable mode of transport. Despite initial political consensus, challenges emerged, including limited public recognition of these measures as policy and criticism of safety and navigation in certain designs. Efforts to institutionalize cycling policy have reduced car dominance and expanded public transport, but socio-spatial inequalities and low engagement from working-class communities persist. Inclusive cycling requires addressing diverse user needs, socio-economic barriers, and intersectional issues.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100852,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Mobility","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100103"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Mobility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667091725000056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the COVID-19 pandemic, cycling was presented as a potential solution to health and environmental challenges in everyday mobility. In Lyon (France), these street experiments posed two challenges for the city authorities: in the short term, to enable people to access essential services and shops while respecting the principles of physical separation; in the long term, to promote a new bicycle-oriented mobility paradigm that goes beyond infrastructure and includes velonomy and velomobility as a system. The aim of this article is to focus on the experience of tactical urbanism during the COVID-19 pandemic in the city of Lyon, the second largest city in France, and to investigate whether these pop-up infrastructures have facilitated a shift towards a cycling oriented mobility paradigm. In this article, we use three types of data: the first comes from a geomatic approach to map the changes, the second is an analysis of the policy context, and the third is the practices of cyclists. The results highlight that tactical urbanism accelerated the adoption of cycling through temporary infrastructure, structural changes, and expanded cycling routes. This approach improved connectivity, safety, and inclusivity while promoting cycling as a viable mode of transport. Despite initial political consensus, challenges emerged, including limited public recognition of these measures as policy and criticism of safety and navigation in certain designs. Efforts to institutionalize cycling policy have reduced car dominance and expanded public transport, but socio-spatial inequalities and low engagement from working-class communities persist. Inclusive cycling requires addressing diverse user needs, socio-economic barriers, and intersectional issues.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信