Automatic detection of ditches and natural streams from digital elevation models using deep learning

IF 4.2 2区 地球科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Mariana Dos Santos Toledo Busarello , Anneli M. Ågren , Florian Westphal , William Lidberg
{"title":"Automatic detection of ditches and natural streams from digital elevation models using deep learning","authors":"Mariana Dos Santos Toledo Busarello ,&nbsp;Anneli M. Ågren ,&nbsp;Florian Westphal ,&nbsp;William Lidberg","doi":"10.1016/j.cageo.2025.105875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Policies focused on waterbody protection and restoration have been suggested to European Union member countries for some time, but to adopt these policies on a large scale the quality of small water channel maps needs considerable improvement. We developed methods to detect and classify small stream and ditch channels using airborne laser scanning and deep learning. The research questions covered the influence of the resolution of the digital elevation model on channel extraction, the efficacy of different terrain indices to identify channels, the potential advantages of combining indices, and the performance of a U-net model in mapping both ditches and stream channels. Models trained in finer resolutions were more accurate than models trained with coarser resolutions. No single terrain index consistently outperformed all others, but some combinations of indices had higher MCC values. Natural stream channels were not classified to the same extent as ditches. The model trained on the 0.5 m resolution had the most balanced performance using a combination of indices trained using the dataset with both types of channel separately. The deep learning model outperformed traditional mapping methods for ditches, increasing the recall from less than 10% to over 92%, while the recall for natural channels was around 71%. However, despite the successful detection of ditches, the models frequently misclassified streams as ditches. This poses a challenge, as natural channels are protected under land use management practices, while ditches are not.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55221,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Geosciences","volume":"196 ","pages":"Article 105875"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Geosciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0098300425000251","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Policies focused on waterbody protection and restoration have been suggested to European Union member countries for some time, but to adopt these policies on a large scale the quality of small water channel maps needs considerable improvement. We developed methods to detect and classify small stream and ditch channels using airborne laser scanning and deep learning. The research questions covered the influence of the resolution of the digital elevation model on channel extraction, the efficacy of different terrain indices to identify channels, the potential advantages of combining indices, and the performance of a U-net model in mapping both ditches and stream channels. Models trained in finer resolutions were more accurate than models trained with coarser resolutions. No single terrain index consistently outperformed all others, but some combinations of indices had higher MCC values. Natural stream channels were not classified to the same extent as ditches. The model trained on the 0.5 m resolution had the most balanced performance using a combination of indices trained using the dataset with both types of channel separately. The deep learning model outperformed traditional mapping methods for ditches, increasing the recall from less than 10% to over 92%, while the recall for natural channels was around 71%. However, despite the successful detection of ditches, the models frequently misclassified streams as ditches. This poses a challenge, as natural channels are protected under land use management practices, while ditches are not.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Geosciences
Computers & Geosciences 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
6.80%
发文量
164
审稿时长
3.4 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Geosciences publishes high impact, original research at the interface between Computer Sciences and Geosciences. Publications should apply modern computer science paradigms, whether computational or informatics-based, to address problems in the geosciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信