Integrated approach to perceived group discrimination and protective factors: Implications for well-being and academic outcomes among Asian university students in Canada

IF 2.4 2区 社会学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Sepase Kingsley Ivande , Isabella Schopper, Nigel Mantou Lou
{"title":"Integrated approach to perceived group discrimination and protective factors: Implications for well-being and academic outcomes among Asian university students in Canada","authors":"Sepase Kingsley Ivande ,&nbsp;Isabella Schopper,&nbsp;Nigel Mantou Lou","doi":"10.1016/j.ijintrel.2024.102112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Asian university students in North America faced intensified discrimination during the COVID-19 pandemic, impacting their well-being and academic outcomes. This study explored how group discrimination, when intertwined with protective factors including low internalized racism, social support, and resilience, relate to well-being and academic outcomes. Using Latent Profile Analysis (LPA), participants were grouped into four profiles: (1) low exposure protected, (2) high exposure vulnerable, (3) low exposure vulnerable, and (4) high exposure protected. Notably, the “(4) high exposure protected” profile characterized by high group discrimination but fortified with higher protective factors was significantly different from “(2) high exposure vulnerable” profile marked by high perceived group discrimination and weaker protective factors. We found that the (4) high exposure protected group, compared to (2) high exposure vulnerable group, exhibited significantly higher sense of belonging to the university community, significantly lower levels of depression and anxiety, as well as significantly higher levels of academic engagement. This result highlights that protective factors may alleviate the impact of group discrimination on well-being and academic outcomes. Implications for interventions aimed at supporting minority students’ welfare in educational settings are discussed, emphasizing the importance of enhancing protective factors to improve well-being and academic outcomes of minority students in the post-pandemic era.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48216,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 102112"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Intercultural Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0147176724001810","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Asian university students in North America faced intensified discrimination during the COVID-19 pandemic, impacting their well-being and academic outcomes. This study explored how group discrimination, when intertwined with protective factors including low internalized racism, social support, and resilience, relate to well-being and academic outcomes. Using Latent Profile Analysis (LPA), participants were grouped into four profiles: (1) low exposure protected, (2) high exposure vulnerable, (3) low exposure vulnerable, and (4) high exposure protected. Notably, the “(4) high exposure protected” profile characterized by high group discrimination but fortified with higher protective factors was significantly different from “(2) high exposure vulnerable” profile marked by high perceived group discrimination and weaker protective factors. We found that the (4) high exposure protected group, compared to (2) high exposure vulnerable group, exhibited significantly higher sense of belonging to the university community, significantly lower levels of depression and anxiety, as well as significantly higher levels of academic engagement. This result highlights that protective factors may alleviate the impact of group discrimination on well-being and academic outcomes. Implications for interventions aimed at supporting minority students’ welfare in educational settings are discussed, emphasizing the importance of enhancing protective factors to improve well-being and academic outcomes of minority students in the post-pandemic era.
群体歧视和保护因素的综合研究:对加拿大亚裔大学生幸福感和学业成绩的影响
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,北美亚洲大学生面临的歧视加剧,影响了他们的福祉和学业成果。本研究探讨了群体歧视与低内化种族主义、社会支持和适应能力等保护因素交织在一起时,如何与幸福感和学业成绩相关。利用潜在剖面分析(Latent Profile Analysis, LPA)将参与者分为4个剖面:(1)低暴露保护型、(2)高暴露脆弱型、(3)低暴露脆弱型和(4)高暴露保护型。值得注意的是,“(4)高暴露受保护”与“(2)高暴露易受伤害”显著不同,前者具有较高的群体歧视,但具有较高的保护因子。我们发现(4)与(2)高暴露弱势群体相比,(4)高暴露保护群体对大学社区的归属感显著提高,抑郁和焦虑水平显著降低,学术投入水平显著提高。这一结果强调了保护性因素可以减轻群体歧视对幸福感和学业成绩的影响。讨论了旨在支持教育环境中少数民族学生福利的干预措施的影响,强调了在大流行后时代加强保护因素以改善少数民族学生福祉和学业成绩的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
122
期刊介绍: IJIR is dedicated to advancing knowledge and understanding of theory, practice, and research in intergroup relations. The contents encompass theoretical developments, field-based evaluations of training techniques, empirical discussions of cultural similarities and differences, and critical descriptions of new training approaches. Papers selected for publication in IJIR are judged to increase our understanding of intergroup tensions and harmony. Issue-oriented and cross-discipline discussion is encouraged. The highest priority is given to manuscripts that join theory, practice, and field research design. By theory, we mean conceptual schemes focused on the nature of cultural differences and similarities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信