Transmission and Distribution Pipeline Leak Identification and Characterization by Walking Survey and Soil Flux Measurements

Ellis S. Robinson,  and , Peter F. DeCarlo*, 
{"title":"Transmission and Distribution Pipeline Leak Identification and Characterization by Walking Survey and Soil Flux Measurements","authors":"Ellis S. Robinson,&nbsp; and ,&nbsp;Peter F. DeCarlo*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acsestair.4c0010910.1021/acsestair.4c00109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >We identified fugitive methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) leaks within natural gas transmission and distribution pipeline rights of way (ROWs) around Pittsburgh, PA, and Baltimore, MD, by means of a walking survey while measuring ambient methane and ethane (C<sub>2</sub> H<sub>6</sub>) mixing ratios. We used the methane time series to determine discrete leaks using a simple algorithm and verified that the methane was fossil in origin via the methane-to-ethane ratio. For transmission ROWs, we found an average of 23 leaks (range of 12 to 47) over 20.1 total km, corresponding to an activity factor (AF) of 1.1 leaks/km (range 0.60 to 2.3 leaks/km). We also quantified total methane emissions for a subset (<i>N</i> = 5) of the identified leaks using a soil flux measurement chamber. The mean leak emission rate (ER) was 172 g/h/leak (range 17 to 452 g/h/leak). Our AF is higher than the Environmental Protection Agency’s Greenhouse Gas Inventory (GHGI) estimate for transmission pipelines, which is 0.02 leaks/km. Our mean ER is also larger than the GHGI estimate for protected steel pipelines (44 g/h/leak). This study provides a model for making AF and ER measurements in vegetated environments with difficult terrain and suggests fugitive emissions from transmission pipelines may be a more significant source of atmospheric methane than is currently outlined in the GHGI.</p><p >This study presents activity (leaks per km) and emission rates (grams per hour per leak) measurements from natural gas transmission pipelines, which have received very little attention as a source of fugitive methane compared to distribution and gathering pipelines. Our results indicate that transmission pipelines may be a more substantial source of fugitive methane than is suggested by current inventories.</p>","PeriodicalId":100014,"journal":{"name":"ACS ES&T Air","volume":"2 1","pages":"31–39 31–39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acsestair.4c00109","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS ES&T Air","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsestair.4c00109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We identified fugitive methane (CH4) leaks within natural gas transmission and distribution pipeline rights of way (ROWs) around Pittsburgh, PA, and Baltimore, MD, by means of a walking survey while measuring ambient methane and ethane (C2 H6) mixing ratios. We used the methane time series to determine discrete leaks using a simple algorithm and verified that the methane was fossil in origin via the methane-to-ethane ratio. For transmission ROWs, we found an average of 23 leaks (range of 12 to 47) over 20.1 total km, corresponding to an activity factor (AF) of 1.1 leaks/km (range 0.60 to 2.3 leaks/km). We also quantified total methane emissions for a subset (N = 5) of the identified leaks using a soil flux measurement chamber. The mean leak emission rate (ER) was 172 g/h/leak (range 17 to 452 g/h/leak). Our AF is higher than the Environmental Protection Agency’s Greenhouse Gas Inventory (GHGI) estimate for transmission pipelines, which is 0.02 leaks/km. Our mean ER is also larger than the GHGI estimate for protected steel pipelines (44 g/h/leak). This study provides a model for making AF and ER measurements in vegetated environments with difficult terrain and suggests fugitive emissions from transmission pipelines may be a more significant source of atmospheric methane than is currently outlined in the GHGI.

This study presents activity (leaks per km) and emission rates (grams per hour per leak) measurements from natural gas transmission pipelines, which have received very little attention as a source of fugitive methane compared to distribution and gathering pipelines. Our results indicate that transmission pipelines may be a more substantial source of fugitive methane than is suggested by current inventories.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信