Pilot implementation study of a default genetic referral process for patients with early-onset colorectal cancer

Kelsey S. Lau-Min , Shavon Rochester , Megan Grabill , Jessica M. Long , Danielle B. McKenna , Jacqueline Powers , Danny Bracy , Leland Boisseau , Peter Gabriel , Randall Oyer , Susan M. Domchek , Katharine A. Rendle , Katherine L. Nathanson , Bryson W. Katona
{"title":"Pilot implementation study of a default genetic referral process for patients with early-onset colorectal cancer","authors":"Kelsey S. Lau-Min ,&nbsp;Shavon Rochester ,&nbsp;Megan Grabill ,&nbsp;Jessica M. Long ,&nbsp;Danielle B. McKenna ,&nbsp;Jacqueline Powers ,&nbsp;Danny Bracy ,&nbsp;Leland Boisseau ,&nbsp;Peter Gabriel ,&nbsp;Randall Oyer ,&nbsp;Susan M. Domchek ,&nbsp;Katharine A. Rendle ,&nbsp;Katherine L. Nathanson ,&nbsp;Bryson W. Katona","doi":"10.1016/j.gimo.2024.101902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosed under age 50 is increasing at alarming rates, with &gt;75% of early-onset cases occurring in patients between 40 and 49 years old. Germline genetic risk evaluations are key to delivering high-quality care to these patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a single-arm pilot implementation study of a default genetic referral process for patients diagnosed with CRC between ages 40 and 49 at 5 hospitals in an academic health system. A research coordinator notified patients and their oncologists of their eligibility for a default genetic referral, after which all patients who did not opt out were referred for genetic counseling, testing, and result disclosure as per usual care. The primary outcome was the genetic referral rate; secondary outcomes included the percentage of eligible patients who were scheduled for a genetic evaluation, completed genetic counseling, and underwent testing within 3 months of the initial referral. We conducted semistructured exit interviews with a subset of patients and oncologists to elicit feedback on the intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included 53 patients, of whom 49 (92%) were referred to genetics, 38 (72%) were scheduled, 22 (42%) completed genetic counseling, and 13 (25%) underwent testing within 3 months of the initial referral. In exit interviews (<em>n</em> = 10 patients and 10 oncologists), participants reported finding the default genetic referral process acceptable and feasible to implement.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>A default genetic referral process is acceptable, feasible, and associated with a high referral rate for patients with early-onset CRC; however, subsequent scheduling, evaluation, and testing rates remain suboptimal.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100576,"journal":{"name":"Genetics in Medicine Open","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 101902"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11780105/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genetics in Medicine Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949774424010483","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Early-onset colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosed under age 50 is increasing at alarming rates, with >75% of early-onset cases occurring in patients between 40 and 49 years old. Germline genetic risk evaluations are key to delivering high-quality care to these patients.

Methods

We conducted a single-arm pilot implementation study of a default genetic referral process for patients diagnosed with CRC between ages 40 and 49 at 5 hospitals in an academic health system. A research coordinator notified patients and their oncologists of their eligibility for a default genetic referral, after which all patients who did not opt out were referred for genetic counseling, testing, and result disclosure as per usual care. The primary outcome was the genetic referral rate; secondary outcomes included the percentage of eligible patients who were scheduled for a genetic evaluation, completed genetic counseling, and underwent testing within 3 months of the initial referral. We conducted semistructured exit interviews with a subset of patients and oncologists to elicit feedback on the intervention.

Results

We included 53 patients, of whom 49 (92%) were referred to genetics, 38 (72%) were scheduled, 22 (42%) completed genetic counseling, and 13 (25%) underwent testing within 3 months of the initial referral. In exit interviews (n = 10 patients and 10 oncologists), participants reported finding the default genetic referral process acceptable and feasible to implement.

Conclusion

A default genetic referral process is acceptable, feasible, and associated with a high referral rate for patients with early-onset CRC; however, subsequent scheduling, evaluation, and testing rates remain suboptimal.
早发性结直肠癌患者默认遗传转诊过程的试点实施研究。
目的:50岁以下诊断的早发性结直肠癌(CRC)正以惊人的速度增长,其中75%的早发性病例发生在40至49岁的患者中。生殖系遗传风险评估是向这些患者提供高质量护理的关键。方法:我们在一个学术卫生系统的5家医院进行了一项单臂试点实施研究,对40至49岁之间诊断为结直肠癌的患者进行了默认遗传转诊过程。研究协调员通知患者和他们的肿瘤学家他们是否有资格接受默认的遗传转诊,之后,所有没有选择退出的患者都被转诊接受遗传咨询、检测和结果披露。主要结局是遗传转诊率;次要结果包括在首次转诊后3个月内安排进行遗传评估、完成遗传咨询并接受检测的符合条件的患者的百分比。我们对一部分患者和肿瘤学家进行了半结构化的退出访谈,以获得对干预措施的反馈。结果:我们纳入53例患者,其中49例(92%)转介遗传学,38例(72%)计划,22例(42%)完成遗传咨询,13例(25%)在首次转诊后3个月内进行了检测。在退出访谈中(n = 10名患者和10名肿瘤学家),参与者报告说,他们发现默认的遗传转诊过程是可以接受的,并且是可行的。结论:默认的遗传转诊过程是可接受的,可行的,并且与早发性CRC患者的高转诊率相关;然而,随后的调度、评估和测试率仍然是次优的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信