Paracetamol poisoning: a prospective comparison of 2 protocols for N-acetylcysteine treatment.

IF 6.3
August Supervía, M ª Àngels Gispert, Jordi Puiguriguer, Pablo Borja Álvarez Zabala, Lidia Martínez Sánchez, Samuel Olmos, Beatriz Calderón, Rocío de Paz Picornell, Santiago Nogué, Francisca Córdoba
{"title":"Paracetamol poisoning: a prospective comparison of 2 protocols for N-acetylcysteine treatment.","authors":"August Supervía, M ª Àngels Gispert, Jordi Puiguriguer, Pablo Borja Álvarez Zabala, Lidia Martínez Sánchez, Samuel Olmos, Beatriz Calderón, Rocío de Paz Picornell, Santiago Nogué, Francisca Córdoba","doi":"10.55633/s3me/100.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Paracetamol poisoning can be serious and require treatment with N-acetylcysteine (NAC). A dose of 300 mg/kg is usually given in 3 fractions over 21 hours. An alternative regimen, the Scottish and Newcastle Acetylcysteine Protocol (SNAP), specifies the same total dose given in 2 intravenous injections over 12 hours. This study aimed to compare the 2 regimens in terms of effectiveness, adverse events, and lengths of emergency department (ED) and hospital stays.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective multicenter study to compare outcomes associated with the traditional NAC regimen vs SNAP. We enrolled all patients with paracetamol poisoning requiring NAC treatment in the participating hospital EDs from 2021 through 2023. Data related to referrals, poisoning episodes, and discharge destinations were collected. Patients were studied in 2 groups according to the protocol assigned in the EDs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 165 patients were treated (SNAP, 103; traditional protocol, 62). The mean (SD) age was 28.1 (19.7) years, and most were female (70.5%). No differences in peak transaminase levels were observed. SNAP-treated patients had significantly fewer adverse effects as well as shorter stays both in the ED (17.8 [15.2] hours vs 25.9 [17.1] hours; P = .001) and on the ward (2.6 [2.3] days vs 4.4 [3.6] days; P = .019).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fewer adverse events occurred with the SNAP approach. The 2 protocols were similarly effective. The SNAP-treated patients spent less time in the ED, and those who were admitted to hospital had shorter stays.</p>","PeriodicalId":93987,"journal":{"name":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","volume":"37 1","pages":"39-43"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55633/s3me/100.2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Paracetamol poisoning can be serious and require treatment with N-acetylcysteine (NAC). A dose of 300 mg/kg is usually given in 3 fractions over 21 hours. An alternative regimen, the Scottish and Newcastle Acetylcysteine Protocol (SNAP), specifies the same total dose given in 2 intravenous injections over 12 hours. This study aimed to compare the 2 regimens in terms of effectiveness, adverse events, and lengths of emergency department (ED) and hospital stays.

Methods: Prospective multicenter study to compare outcomes associated with the traditional NAC regimen vs SNAP. We enrolled all patients with paracetamol poisoning requiring NAC treatment in the participating hospital EDs from 2021 through 2023. Data related to referrals, poisoning episodes, and discharge destinations were collected. Patients were studied in 2 groups according to the protocol assigned in the EDs.

Results: A total of 165 patients were treated (SNAP, 103; traditional protocol, 62). The mean (SD) age was 28.1 (19.7) years, and most were female (70.5%). No differences in peak transaminase levels were observed. SNAP-treated patients had significantly fewer adverse effects as well as shorter stays both in the ED (17.8 [15.2] hours vs 25.9 [17.1] hours; P = .001) and on the ward (2.6 [2.3] days vs 4.4 [3.6] days; P = .019).

Conclusions: Fewer adverse events occurred with the SNAP approach. The 2 protocols were similarly effective. The SNAP-treated patients spent less time in the ED, and those who were admitted to hospital had shorter stays.

扑热息痛中毒:n -乙酰半胱氨酸治疗两种方案的前瞻性比较。
目的:扑热息痛中毒可能很严重,需要用n -乙酰半胱氨酸(NAC)治疗。300mg /kg的剂量通常在21小时内分三次给药。另一种替代方案,苏格兰和纽卡斯尔乙酰半胱氨酸方案(SNAP),规定在12小时内进行2次静脉注射,总剂量相同。本研究旨在比较两种方案的有效性、不良事件、急诊科(ED)和住院时间。方法:前瞻性多中心研究,比较传统NAC方案与SNAP方案的相关结果。我们纳入了2021年至2023年在参与研究的医院急诊科接受NAC治疗的所有扑热息痛中毒患者。收集与转诊、中毒事件和出院目的地相关的数据。根据急诊科指定的方案,将患者分为两组进行研究。结果:共治疗165例患者(SNAP, 103例;传统协议,62)。平均(SD)年龄28.1(19.7)岁,以女性居多(70.5%)。转氨酶峰值水平未见差异。snap治疗的患者在急诊科的不良反应明显减少,住院时间也更短(17.8[15.2]小时vs 25.9[17.1]小时);P = .001)和在病房(2.6[2.3]天vs 4.4[3.6]天;P = .019)。结论:采用SNAP方法发生的不良事件较少。这两种方案的效果相似。接受snap治疗的患者在急诊科待的时间更短,入院的患者住院时间更短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信