Streptococcus mutans and Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

D Mazurel, B W Brandt, M Boomsma, W Crielaard, M Lagerweij, R A M Exterkate, D M Deng
{"title":"<i>Streptococcus mutans</i> and Caries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"D Mazurel, B W Brandt, M Boomsma, W Crielaard, M Lagerweij, R A M Exterkate, D M Deng","doi":"10.1177/00220345241303880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It has been questioned whether <i>Streptococcus mutans</i> can still be considered the major etiological agent for caries. The main argument is that most evidence has been based on single-species identification. The composition of the oral microbiome was not analyzed. This systemic review aims to assess the prevalence and abundance of <i>S. mutans</i> in caries-active (CA) and caries-free (CF) subjects based on clinical studies in which the microbiome was investigated. Three databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Embase) were searched until May 22, 2023, for eligible publications that included CA and CF subjects and reported the detection of both <i>S. mutans</i> and the oral microbial community, using DNA-based methods. The clinical and microbial outcomes were summarized and further analyzed using a random-effects model. Of 22 eligible studies, 3 were excluded due to the high risk of bias. In the remaining 19 studies, 16 reported the prevalence of <i>S. mutans</i>, 11 reported its relative abundance, and 8 reported both parameters. The prevalence of <i>S. mutans</i> in CA was either similar to (<i>n</i> = 4) or higher than (<i>n</i> = 12) the CF group. The reported relative abundance in CA was higher than CF in all 11 studies, although the values varied from 0.001% to 5%. Meta-analysis confirmed the significance of these findings. The summary of microbial community data did not reveal other caries-associated bacterial genera/species than <i>S. mutans</i>. In conclusion, the collected evidence based on microbiome studies suggests a strong association between the prevalence and abundance of <i>S. mutans</i> and caries experience. While the cariogenic role of <i>S. mutans</i> in the oral ecosystem should be recognized, its actual function warrants further exploration.</p>","PeriodicalId":94075,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dental research","volume":" ","pages":"220345241303880"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dental research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345241303880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It has been questioned whether Streptococcus mutans can still be considered the major etiological agent for caries. The main argument is that most evidence has been based on single-species identification. The composition of the oral microbiome was not analyzed. This systemic review aims to assess the prevalence and abundance of S. mutans in caries-active (CA) and caries-free (CF) subjects based on clinical studies in which the microbiome was investigated. Three databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Embase) were searched until May 22, 2023, for eligible publications that included CA and CF subjects and reported the detection of both S. mutans and the oral microbial community, using DNA-based methods. The clinical and microbial outcomes were summarized and further analyzed using a random-effects model. Of 22 eligible studies, 3 were excluded due to the high risk of bias. In the remaining 19 studies, 16 reported the prevalence of S. mutans, 11 reported its relative abundance, and 8 reported both parameters. The prevalence of S. mutans in CA was either similar to (n = 4) or higher than (n = 12) the CF group. The reported relative abundance in CA was higher than CF in all 11 studies, although the values varied from 0.001% to 5%. Meta-analysis confirmed the significance of these findings. The summary of microbial community data did not reveal other caries-associated bacterial genera/species than S. mutans. In conclusion, the collected evidence based on microbiome studies suggests a strong association between the prevalence and abundance of S. mutans and caries experience. While the cariogenic role of S. mutans in the oral ecosystem should be recognized, its actual function warrants further exploration.

变形链球菌和龋齿:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
变形链球菌是否仍然可以被认为是龋齿的主要病原一直受到质疑。主要的论点是,大多数证据都是基于单一物种的鉴定。未分析口腔微生物组的组成。本系统综述旨在评估变形链球菌在龋齿活动性(CA)和无龋齿(CF)受试者中微生物组调查的临床研究的患病率和丰度。检索三个数据库(PubMed, Cochrane, Embase),直到2023年5月22日,检索包括CA和CF受试者的符合条件的出版物,并使用基于dna的方法报告了变形链球菌和口腔微生物群落的检测。采用随机效应模型对临床和微生物结果进行总结和进一步分析。在22项符合条件的研究中,3项因偏倚风险高而被排除。在其余19项研究中,16项报告了变形链球菌的流行,11项报告了其相对丰度,8项报告了两者的参数。CA中变形链球菌的患病率与CF组相似(n = 4)或高于CF组(n = 12)。在所有11项研究中,CA的相对丰度都高于CF,尽管其值从0.001%到5%不等。荟萃分析证实了这些发现的重要性。微生物群落数据总结未发现除变形链球菌外的其他与龋齿相关的细菌属/种。总之,基于微生物组研究收集到的证据表明,变形链球菌的患病率和丰度与龋齿经历之间存在密切关联。虽然变形链球菌在口腔生态系统中的蛀牙作用值得认识,但其实际功能有待进一步探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信