A Checklist to Improve Acute Stroke Evaluation and Treatment in the Emergency Department.

Meagan Elam, Rachel Moyal-Smith, Madison Canfora, Wendy Cohen, Ki-Do Eum, Christopher Fischer, Judy Margo, Marie McCune, Omer Moin, Magdy Selim, Linda Wendell, Sandeep Kumar
{"title":"A Checklist to Improve Acute Stroke Evaluation and Treatment in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Meagan Elam, Rachel Moyal-Smith, Madison Canfora, Wendy Cohen, Ki-Do Eum, Christopher Fischer, Judy Margo, Marie McCune, Omer Moin, Magdy Selim, Linda Wendell, Sandeep Kumar","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Narrow therapeutic time windows and delays in assessing acute ischemic stroke patients limit the access to and effectiveness of reperfusion therapies. A 2-year quality improvement project codesigned and tested a checklist for quicker evaluation of suspected stroke cases in 2 emergency departments (EDs). Utility, feasibility, and implementation barriers were assessed through semistructured interviews. The impact on stroke quality metrics was analyzed using bivariate and multivariate regression models with data from the American Heart Association's Get With the Guidelines registry. Implementing the checklist was significantly associated with higher odds of receiving intravenous thrombolytics within 60 minutes of ED arrival (odds ratio: 6.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-68.7, P = 0.03). Users felt the checklist improved the standardization of stroke care and promoted teamwork, especially in a time of higher staff turnover. An ED-based stroke checklist resulted in timelier stroke care for acute ischemic stroke patients, meriting further testing in larger, more diverse settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":" ","pages":"53-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Narrow therapeutic time windows and delays in assessing acute ischemic stroke patients limit the access to and effectiveness of reperfusion therapies. A 2-year quality improvement project codesigned and tested a checklist for quicker evaluation of suspected stroke cases in 2 emergency departments (EDs). Utility, feasibility, and implementation barriers were assessed through semistructured interviews. The impact on stroke quality metrics was analyzed using bivariate and multivariate regression models with data from the American Heart Association's Get With the Guidelines registry. Implementing the checklist was significantly associated with higher odds of receiving intravenous thrombolytics within 60 minutes of ED arrival (odds ratio: 6.4, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-68.7, P = 0.03). Users felt the checklist improved the standardization of stroke care and promoted teamwork, especially in a time of higher staff turnover. An ED-based stroke checklist resulted in timelier stroke care for acute ischemic stroke patients, meriting further testing in larger, more diverse settings.

改进急诊科急性脑卒中评估和治疗的检查表
狭窄的治疗时间窗口和评估急性缺血性卒中患者的延迟限制了再灌注治疗的可及性和有效性。一项为期两年的质量改进项目共同设计并测试了一份检查表,以更快地评估两个急诊科(ed)的疑似中风病例。通过半结构化访谈评估效用、可行性和实施障碍。使用双变量和多变量回归模型分析对卒中质量指标的影响,数据来自美国心脏协会Get with The Guidelines注册表。实施检查表与急诊到达后60分钟内接受静脉溶栓治疗的几率显著相关(优势比:6.4,95%可信区间:1.1-68.7,P = 0.03)。用户认为检查表提高了卒中护理的标准化,促进了团队合作,特别是在员工离职率较高的时期。基于ed的卒中检查表为急性缺血性卒中患者提供了更及时的卒中护理,值得在更大、更多样化的环境中进行进一步的测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信