Anna Luan MD, MS , Jeffrey Friedrich MD, MC , Aviram Giladi MD, MS , Suhail K. Mithani MD , Peter Rhee DO, MS , Bauback Safa MD , Adam Strohl MD , Kyle R. Eberlin MD
{"title":"The Mangled Digit Severity Score: Determining Salvageability of Severe Digital Injuries","authors":"Anna Luan MD, MS , Jeffrey Friedrich MD, MC , Aviram Giladi MD, MS , Suhail K. Mithani MD , Peter Rhee DO, MS , Bauback Safa MD , Adam Strohl MD , Kyle R. Eberlin MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.12.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The assessment, prognostication, and decision-making for mangled digital injuries can be challenging, even for experienced surgeons. This study aimed to develop a Mangled Digit Severity Score (MDSS) to predict whether a mangled digit should be salvaged.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An anonymous questionnaire was sent to 67 hand surgeons at seven hand trauma centers as an initial survey panel. Participants were provided a list of factors influencing outcomes following a mangled digit injury and were asked to assign weights from 0–10 for each factor reflecting its relative importance in determining likelihood of functional salvage versus failure or secondary amputation. Using a modified Delphi method, iterative questionnaire rounds then were performed with seven expert panelists and consensus established. The final ratings were used to develop a weighted scoring system to assess mangled digits. A retrospective single-center review was conducted to validate the scoring system. The sensitivity and specificity for amputation at different MDSS prognostic thresholds were evaluated, and a receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From initial surgeon responses (36/67 response rate) and two subsequent rating rounds, consensus was achieved on 14 factors, including crush/avulsion mechanism, intraarticular fracture, and zone II flexor tendon injury. Final weights for all factors ranged between 3–9. Among 54 mangled digits reviewed, digits that were salvaged had a significantly lower MDSS than those that underwent amputation. The MDSS demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.87. At a threshold of 35, the MDSS achieved a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 88% in predicting amputation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The MDSS was developed through a consensus of experts and is a useful tool for identifying mangled digits that may not be salvageable.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><div>The MDSS provides a structured framework for the assessment of severely injured digits with a prognostic guideline for amputation or salvage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":"50 4","pages":"Pages 407-415"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363502324006403","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose
The assessment, prognostication, and decision-making for mangled digital injuries can be challenging, even for experienced surgeons. This study aimed to develop a Mangled Digit Severity Score (MDSS) to predict whether a mangled digit should be salvaged.
Methods
An anonymous questionnaire was sent to 67 hand surgeons at seven hand trauma centers as an initial survey panel. Participants were provided a list of factors influencing outcomes following a mangled digit injury and were asked to assign weights from 0–10 for each factor reflecting its relative importance in determining likelihood of functional salvage versus failure or secondary amputation. Using a modified Delphi method, iterative questionnaire rounds then were performed with seven expert panelists and consensus established. The final ratings were used to develop a weighted scoring system to assess mangled digits. A retrospective single-center review was conducted to validate the scoring system. The sensitivity and specificity for amputation at different MDSS prognostic thresholds were evaluated, and a receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve were calculated.
Results
From initial surgeon responses (36/67 response rate) and two subsequent rating rounds, consensus was achieved on 14 factors, including crush/avulsion mechanism, intraarticular fracture, and zone II flexor tendon injury. Final weights for all factors ranged between 3–9. Among 54 mangled digits reviewed, digits that were salvaged had a significantly lower MDSS than those that underwent amputation. The MDSS demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.87. At a threshold of 35, the MDSS achieved a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 88% in predicting amputation.
Conclusions
The MDSS was developed through a consensus of experts and is a useful tool for identifying mangled digits that may not be salvageable.
Clinical relevance
The MDSS provides a structured framework for the assessment of severely injured digits with a prognostic guideline for amputation or salvage.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.