The Mangled Digit Severity Score: Determining Salvageability of Severe Digital Injuries

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Anna Luan MD, MS , Jeffrey Friedrich MD, MC , Aviram Giladi MD, MS , Suhail K. Mithani MD , Peter Rhee DO, MS , Bauback Safa MD , Adam Strohl MD , Kyle R. Eberlin MD
{"title":"The Mangled Digit Severity Score: Determining Salvageability of Severe Digital Injuries","authors":"Anna Luan MD, MS ,&nbsp;Jeffrey Friedrich MD, MC ,&nbsp;Aviram Giladi MD, MS ,&nbsp;Suhail K. Mithani MD ,&nbsp;Peter Rhee DO, MS ,&nbsp;Bauback Safa MD ,&nbsp;Adam Strohl MD ,&nbsp;Kyle R. Eberlin MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.12.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The assessment, prognostication, and decision-making for mangled digital injuries can be challenging, even for experienced surgeons. This study aimed to develop a Mangled Digit Severity Score (MDSS) to predict whether a mangled digit should be salvaged.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>An anonymous questionnaire was sent to 67 hand surgeons at seven hand trauma centers as an initial survey panel. Participants were provided a list of factors influencing outcomes following a mangled digit injury and were asked to assign weights from 0–10 for each factor reflecting its relative importance in determining likelihood of functional salvage versus failure or secondary amputation. Using a modified Delphi method, iterative questionnaire rounds then were performed with seven expert panelists and consensus established. The final ratings were used to develop a weighted scoring system to assess mangled digits. A retrospective single-center review was conducted to validate the scoring system. The sensitivity and specificity for amputation at different MDSS prognostic thresholds were evaluated, and a receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve were calculated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>From initial surgeon responses (36/67 response rate) and two subsequent rating rounds, consensus was achieved on 14 factors, including crush/avulsion mechanism, intraarticular fracture, and zone II flexor tendon injury. Final weights for all factors ranged between 3–9. Among 54 mangled digits reviewed, digits that were salvaged had a significantly lower MDSS than those that underwent amputation. The MDSS demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.87. At a threshold of 35, the MDSS achieved a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 88% in predicting amputation.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The MDSS was developed through a consensus of experts and is a useful tool for identifying mangled digits that may not be salvageable.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical relevance</h3><div>The MDSS provides a structured framework for the assessment of severely injured digits with a prognostic guideline for amputation or salvage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54815,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","volume":"50 4","pages":"Pages 407-415"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363502324006403","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The assessment, prognostication, and decision-making for mangled digital injuries can be challenging, even for experienced surgeons. This study aimed to develop a Mangled Digit Severity Score (MDSS) to predict whether a mangled digit should be salvaged.

Methods

An anonymous questionnaire was sent to 67 hand surgeons at seven hand trauma centers as an initial survey panel. Participants were provided a list of factors influencing outcomes following a mangled digit injury and were asked to assign weights from 0–10 for each factor reflecting its relative importance in determining likelihood of functional salvage versus failure or secondary amputation. Using a modified Delphi method, iterative questionnaire rounds then were performed with seven expert panelists and consensus established. The final ratings were used to develop a weighted scoring system to assess mangled digits. A retrospective single-center review was conducted to validate the scoring system. The sensitivity and specificity for amputation at different MDSS prognostic thresholds were evaluated, and a receiver operating characteristic curve and area under the curve were calculated.

Results

From initial surgeon responses (36/67 response rate) and two subsequent rating rounds, consensus was achieved on 14 factors, including crush/avulsion mechanism, intraarticular fracture, and zone II flexor tendon injury. Final weights for all factors ranged between 3–9. Among 54 mangled digits reviewed, digits that were salvaged had a significantly lower MDSS than those that underwent amputation. The MDSS demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.87. At a threshold of 35, the MDSS achieved a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 88% in predicting amputation.

Conclusions

The MDSS was developed through a consensus of experts and is a useful tool for identifying mangled digits that may not be salvageable.

Clinical relevance

The MDSS provides a structured framework for the assessment of severely injured digits with a prognostic guideline for amputation or salvage.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
10.50%
发文量
402
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Surgery publishes original, peer-reviewed articles related to the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of diseases and conditions of the upper extremity; these include both clinical and basic science studies, along with case reports. Special features include Review Articles (including Current Concepts and The Hand Surgery Landscape), Reviews of Books and Media, and Letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信