“It was a good opportunity for us to be in touch with public health”: Independent community pharmacists’ experiences working with public health before and during COVID-19

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ellen B. Rubinstein PhD, Anna-Helena Preugschas MPH, Elizabeth Skoy PharmD, Lisa Nagel PharmD, Mary Larson PhD
{"title":"“It was a good opportunity for us to be in touch with public health”: Independent community pharmacists’ experiences working with public health before and during COVID-19","authors":"Ellen B. Rubinstein PhD,&nbsp;Anna-Helena Preugschas MPH,&nbsp;Elizabeth Skoy PharmD,&nbsp;Lisa Nagel PharmD,&nbsp;Mary Larson PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Pharmacies have been a significant part of improving population health since before the COVID-19 pandemic. However, little is known about the working relationships between pharmacies and public health entities. This exploratory study describes independent community pharmacists' perceptions during COVID-19 of both pre-existing and newly created relationships with public health.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This paper is based on 42 qualitative interviews conducted as part of a broader study on North Dakota pharmacy's role in the COVID-19 pandemic. Authors analyzed interview data both deductively (based on a priori interview questions) and inductively (based on emergent themes). We used key quotes to map working relationships between pharmacy and public health on two axes: personal interactions and service provision.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>Interviewees worked at 42 pharmacies (21 urban and 21 rural) and described relationships with public health entities that fell into four categories: (i) service provision with personal interactions predating the pandemic; (ii) service provision without personal interactions predating the pandemic; (iii) personal interactions that evolved during the pandemic; and (iv) service provision that evolved during the pandemic. Rural pharmacists described personal interactions and pre-pandemic service provision more often than urban pharmacists. Most urban pharmacists developed working relationships with public health entities solely because of the pandemic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>This study begins mapping the range of relationships that can exist between community pharmacies and public health entities. Our data suggest it may be possible to leverage pharmacists to extend public health's reach and improve the health of medically underserved, rural populations.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12921","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Pharmacies have been a significant part of improving population health since before the COVID-19 pandemic. However, little is known about the working relationships between pharmacies and public health entities. This exploratory study describes independent community pharmacists' perceptions during COVID-19 of both pre-existing and newly created relationships with public health.

Methods

This paper is based on 42 qualitative interviews conducted as part of a broader study on North Dakota pharmacy's role in the COVID-19 pandemic. Authors analyzed interview data both deductively (based on a priori interview questions) and inductively (based on emergent themes). We used key quotes to map working relationships between pharmacy and public health on two axes: personal interactions and service provision.

Findings

Interviewees worked at 42 pharmacies (21 urban and 21 rural) and described relationships with public health entities that fell into four categories: (i) service provision with personal interactions predating the pandemic; (ii) service provision without personal interactions predating the pandemic; (iii) personal interactions that evolved during the pandemic; and (iv) service provision that evolved during the pandemic. Rural pharmacists described personal interactions and pre-pandemic service provision more often than urban pharmacists. Most urban pharmacists developed working relationships with public health entities solely because of the pandemic.

Conclusions

This study begins mapping the range of relationships that can exist between community pharmacies and public health entities. Our data suggest it may be possible to leverage pharmacists to extend public health's reach and improve the health of medically underserved, rural populations.

“这是我们接触公共卫生的好机会”:独立社区药剂师在COVID-19之前和期间从事公共卫生工作的经验。
目的:自COVID-19大流行之前以来,药房一直是改善人口健康的重要组成部分。然而,人们对药房与公共卫生实体之间的工作关系知之甚少。本探索性研究描述了独立社区药剂师在COVID-19期间对现有和新建立的公共卫生关系的看法。方法:本文基于42次定性访谈,作为北达科他州药房在COVID-19大流行中作用的更广泛研究的一部分。作者对访谈数据进行了演绎分析(基于先验访谈问题)和归纳分析(基于突发主题)。我们使用关键引语来绘制药房和公共卫生之间的工作关系的两个轴:个人互动和服务提供。调查结果:受访者在42家药店(21家城市药店和21家农村药店)工作,并描述了与公共卫生实体的关系,这些关系可分为四类:(i)在大流行之前提供个人互动的服务;㈡在大流行之前提供没有个人互动的服务;(三)大流行期间形成的个人互动;(四)大流行期间发展起来的服务提供。农村药剂师比城市药剂师更多地描述了个人互动和大流行前的服务提供。大多数城市药剂师仅仅因为大流行才与公共卫生实体建立了工作关系。结论:本研究开始绘制社区药房和公共卫生实体之间可能存在的关系范围。我们的数据表明,有可能利用药剂师扩大公共卫生的覆盖面,改善医疗服务不足的农村人口的健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信