Navigating the future of pediatric cardiovascular surgery: Insights and innovation powered by Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT).

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Rittal Mehta, Justus G Reitz, Alyssia Venna, Arif Selcuk, Bishakha Dhamala, Jennifer Klein, Christine Sawda, Mitchell Haverty, Can Yerebakan, Aybala Tongut, Manan Desai, Yves d'Udekem
{"title":"Navigating the future of pediatric cardiovascular surgery: Insights and innovation powered by Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT).","authors":"Rittal Mehta, Justus G Reitz, Alyssia Venna, Arif Selcuk, Bishakha Dhamala, Jennifer Klein, Christine Sawda, Mitchell Haverty, Can Yerebakan, Aybala Tongut, Manan Desai, Yves d'Udekem","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.01.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Interdisciplinary consultations are essential to decision-making for patients with congenital heart disease. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing into medical practice is rapidly accelerating, opening new avenues to diagnosis and treatment. The main objective of this study was to consult the AI-trained model Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) regarding cases discussed during a cardiovascular surgery conference (CSC) at a single tertiary center and compare the ChatGPT suggestions with CSC expert consensus results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 37 cases discussed at a single CSC were retrospectively identified. Clinical information comprised deidentified data from the last electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, intensive care unit progress note (or cardiology clinic note if outpatient), as well as a patient summary. The diagnosis was removed from the summary and possible treatment options were deleted from all notes. ChatGPT (version 4.0) was asked to summarize the case, identify diagnoses, and recommend surgical procedures and timing of surgery. The responses of ChatGPT were compared with the results of the CSC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 37 cases uploaded to ChatGPT, 45.9% (n = 17) were considered to be less complex cases, with only 1 treatment option, and 54.1% (n = 20) were considered more complex, with several treatment options. ChatGPT correctly provided a detailed and systematically written summary for each case within 10 to 15 seconds. ChatGPT correctly identified diagnoses for approximately 94.5% (n = 35) cases. The surgical intervention plan matched the group decision for approximately 40.5% (n = 15) cases; however, it differed in 27% cases. In 23 of 37 cases, timing of surgery was the same between CSC group and ChatGPT. Overall, the match between ChatGPT responses and CSC decisions for diagnosis was 94.5%, surgical intervention was 40.5%, and timing of surgery was 62.2%. However, within complex cases, we have 25% agreement for surgical intervention and 67% for timing of surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ChatGPT can be used as an augmentative tool for surgical conferences to systematically summarize large amounts of patient data from electronic health records and clinical notes in seconds. In addition, our study points out the potential of ChatGPT as an AI-based decision support tool in surgery, particularly for less-complex cases. The discrepancy, particularly in complex cases, emphasizes on the need for caution when using ChatGPT in decision-making for the complex cases in pediatric cardiovascular surgery. There is little doubt that the public will soon use this comparative tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.01.022","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Interdisciplinary consultations are essential to decision-making for patients with congenital heart disease. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and natural language processing into medical practice is rapidly accelerating, opening new avenues to diagnosis and treatment. The main objective of this study was to consult the AI-trained model Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) regarding cases discussed during a cardiovascular surgery conference (CSC) at a single tertiary center and compare the ChatGPT suggestions with CSC expert consensus results.

Methods: In total, 37 cases discussed at a single CSC were retrospectively identified. Clinical information comprised deidentified data from the last electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, intensive care unit progress note (or cardiology clinic note if outpatient), as well as a patient summary. The diagnosis was removed from the summary and possible treatment options were deleted from all notes. ChatGPT (version 4.0) was asked to summarize the case, identify diagnoses, and recommend surgical procedures and timing of surgery. The responses of ChatGPT were compared with the results of the CSC.

Results: Of the 37 cases uploaded to ChatGPT, 45.9% (n = 17) were considered to be less complex cases, with only 1 treatment option, and 54.1% (n = 20) were considered more complex, with several treatment options. ChatGPT correctly provided a detailed and systematically written summary for each case within 10 to 15 seconds. ChatGPT correctly identified diagnoses for approximately 94.5% (n = 35) cases. The surgical intervention plan matched the group decision for approximately 40.5% (n = 15) cases; however, it differed in 27% cases. In 23 of 37 cases, timing of surgery was the same between CSC group and ChatGPT. Overall, the match between ChatGPT responses and CSC decisions for diagnosis was 94.5%, surgical intervention was 40.5%, and timing of surgery was 62.2%. However, within complex cases, we have 25% agreement for surgical intervention and 67% for timing of surgery.

Conclusions: ChatGPT can be used as an augmentative tool for surgical conferences to systematically summarize large amounts of patient data from electronic health records and clinical notes in seconds. In addition, our study points out the potential of ChatGPT as an AI-based decision support tool in surgery, particularly for less-complex cases. The discrepancy, particularly in complex cases, emphasizes on the need for caution when using ChatGPT in decision-making for the complex cases in pediatric cardiovascular surgery. There is little doubt that the public will soon use this comparative tool.

导航儿科心血管外科的未来:由ChatGPT提供支持的见解和创新。
简介:跨学科会诊对先天性心脏病患者的决策至关重要。人工智能(AI)和自然语言处理(NLP)在医疗实践中的整合正在迅速加速,为诊断和治疗开辟了新的途径。本研究的主要目的是咨询人工智能训练模型聊天生成预训练变压器(ChatGPT)关于在单一三级中心的心血管外科会议(CSC)上讨论的病例,并将ChatGPT建议与CSC专家共识结果进行比较。方法:回顾性分析单个CSC的37例病例。临床信息包括最后一次心电图、超声心动图、ICU病程记录(或门诊心脏病学临床记录)以及患者总结的去识别数据。诊断从摘要中删除,可能的治疗方案从所有注释中删除。ChatGPT (v.4.0)被要求总结病例,确定诊断,并建议手术程序和手术时机。ChatGPT的响应与CSC的结果进行了比较。结果:在上传至ChatGPT的37例病例中,45.9% (n=17)被认为是较不复杂的病例,只有一种治疗方案;54.1% (n=20)被认为是较复杂的病例,有多种治疗方案。ChatGPT在10-15秒内正确地为每个案例提供了详细而系统的书面摘要。ChatGPT正确识别诊断约94.5% (n=35)例。约40.5% (n=15)例手术干预方案符合组决策;然而,在27%的病例中存在差异。37例中有23例的手术时间CSC组与ChatGPT组相同。总体而言,ChatGPT反应与CSC诊断决策的匹配度为94.5%,手术干预率为40.5%,手术时机为62.2%。然而,在复杂的病例中,我们有25%同意手术干预,67%同意手术时机。结论:ChatGPT可以作为外科会议的辅助工具,在数秒内系统地汇总来自电子病历和临床笔记的大量患者数据。此外,我们的研究指出ChatGPT作为手术中基于人工智能的决策支持工具的潜力,特别是对于不太复杂的病例。这种差异,特别是在复杂病例中,强调了在儿科心血管外科复杂病例中使用ChatGPT进行决策时需要谨慎。毫无疑问,公众很快就会使用这种比较工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1079
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery presents original, peer-reviewed articles on diseases of the heart, great vessels, lungs and thorax with emphasis on surgical interventions. An official publication of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association, the Journal focuses on techniques and developments in acquired cardiac surgery, congenital cardiac repair, thoracic procedures, heart and lung transplantation, mechanical circulatory support and other procedures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信